Cyberpunk 2077, Elden Ring, Final Fantasy VII Remake and Duskbloods all run at 30 FPS on Switch 2

Says the green rat now pretending to be a nintendork.
Billy Madison Shut Up GIF
 
It's a customised chip based on ampere but with ada features. Ada came out after the PS5 did.

You clearly don't know what is in the Switch.
Came out after or before doesn't matter. My measure of being "more advanced or not" is the final output and performance of the machine.

A 3090 is more advanced than RDNA , a crippled Switch 2 isn't.
 
Yes, more advanced in whatever inside Switch 2.

Because Nintendo is getting whatever old leftover from Nvidia, they are not even customizing sh** , cheap silicone on an old outdated node.

I'm sure Nvidia regrets partnering up with Nintendo and releasing what is inevitably soon to become the best selling gaming hardware of all time. Such a frugal endeavour surely relegates Nintendo to "leftover" territory.
 
FF7 Remake. Steamdeck vs Switch 2


20220617133714_1.jpg

Proxy_02_Cut_Scene_REACTOR-clq77oz5k.jpg

20220618215333_1.jpg

Proxy_05_Field_WALK-tpvvltfrr.jpg

20220619185648_1.jpg

Proxy_04_Battle_BOSS-a9e6dahhc.jpg


20220619044723_1.jpg

Proxy_01_Cut_Scene_CLOUD-ztjb2kgsj.jpg

20220617134014_1.jpg

Proxy_03_Battle_ABILITY.png-0r8kqpea2.jpg
Firstly bullshots. Secondly, I can't tell what you're comparing because you are being disingenuous with your comparison. Most of the shots aren't like for like.

Not defending the steam deck here but, the steam deck will have a significantly cheaper cost of ownership. You could probably buy the rog ally x and by the end of the gen, you'd probably still come out ahead of switch 2 in total cost of ownership.
 
Came out after or before doesn't matter. My measure of being "more advanced or not" is the final output and performance of the machine.

A 3090 is more advanced than RDNA , a crippled Switch 2 isn't.

The specific quote was: "more advanced hardware than PS5, yet less powerful due to form factor constraints". It wasn't about power.
 
I'm sure Nvidia regrets partnering up with Nintendo and releasing what is inevitably soon to become the best selling gaming hardware of all time. Such a frugal endeavour surely relegates Nintendo to "leftover" territory.

Believe me Nvidia IS happy, I wouldn't say the same for Nintendo though knowing how Nvidia treat their vendors lol
 
The crazy thing is that Nintendo want to charge $700 CAD post tax for a system with out of date hardware. The system is struggling to play cyberpunk at sub 1080p and struggling to hold 30fps. Why anyone would pay money for that is wild.
 
So this console is as powerful as a 12 year old console? Well, I doubt GTA6 will see the light of day on this. Hopefully Nintendo releases some must have first party games, otherwise there is no reason to buy it until that point in time.
 
Not defending the steam deck here but, the steam deck will have a significantly cheaper cost of ownership. You could probably buy the rog ally x and by the end of the gen, you'd probably still come out ahead of switch 2 in total cost of ownership.
I'm just comparing the power of the systems.
At the end of the day you won't be able to find a portable system that could produce this kind of image fidelity around the Switch 2 price.

lcQQBoJ.png
 
I'm just comparing the power of the systems.
At the end of the day you won't be able to find a portable system that could produce this kind of image fidelity around the Switch 2 price.

lcQQBoJ.png
Thats a nice looking ps3 end gen game.. whats the name?
 
Last edited:
The crazy thing is that Nintendo want to charge $700 CAD post tax for a system with out of date hardware. The system is struggling to play cyberpunk at sub 1080p and struggling to hold 30fps. Why anyone would pay money for that is wild.
Nintendo fans will.

Those gamers highly value portable gaming at the sacrifice of good specs and gaming performance. Hence why their handhelds always sold a shit ton of units. At least, it could be expected in the past when their hardware (both consoles and handhelds) are always dirt cheap vs the competition.

But the real test now is Switch 2 is at PS5/SX prices. And some games will be $80 US ($90 if they want physical). It'll be interesting how much sticker shock affects sales, or if the gamers and families buying Nintendo stuff just go with it with price being no object.
 
Last edited:
I'm just comparing the power of the systems.
At the end of the day you won't be able to find a portable system that could produce this kind of image fidelity around the Switch 2 price.

lcQQBoJ.png

Honestly… graphics just look like halo 3 at higher resolution.
 
Last edited:
Hardly anyone thought it would match PS5. The person I saw talk about that the most was you, saying other people thought that.

It is a lot more capable than you were expecting though right?
There were plenty more, just like a lot of people were saying the system would be $399 and after the price reveal, the same people are saying that they were expecting 499 but $449 is fine.

I mean, these games had a PS4 version, and we have yet to see how they run on the Switch 2, June is coming soon tho.
 
For the "only going to buy a Ninty machine" people, This is the only way they'd ever be exposed to these titles, so hurray, but god damn…I feel like if you're the type of gamer who'd wanna play Elden Ring, Cyberpunk etc….youd be a tinsy bit more savvy and just upgrade to Xbox or PS for a much better experience. Christ, the PS5 digital is essentially the same cost.
 
For the "only going to buy a Ninty machine" people, This is the only way they'd ever be exposed to these titles, so hurray, but god damn…I feel like if you're the type of gamer who'd wanna play Elden Ring, Cyberpunk etc….youd be a tinsy bit more savvy and just upgrade to Xbox or PS for a much better experience. Christ, the PS5 digital is essentially the same cost.

Switch (and the Switch 2) are really just handhelds with a dock. The correct comparison is with the Deck and not PS5/XSX.
 
I'm just comparing the power of the systems.
At the end of the day you won't be able to find a portable system that could produce this kind of image fidelity around the Switch 2 price.

lcQQBoJ.png

Is that supposed to look good? The rocks look like they're made of plastic. The problem with Metroid isn't the capabilities of the Switch 2, it's Nintendo's constant use of low quality textures and flat lighting.
 
Switch (and the Switch 2) are really just handhelds with a dock. The correct comparison is with the Deck and not PS5/XSX.
I was more comparing the optimal experience for playing the games listed above, which are the more AAA "hardcore" gamer type titles, which is what led me to say that you'd think a one of the other home consoles would be a better option.

It was less about making and apples to apples comparison and more just what made economic sense/bang for someone's buck.

I get the trade off/value proposition is it's a convenient portable option….but in most situations I don't think it's use as a portable is really going to make the trade off worth it.

I'm sure there's use cases/edge cases but I'd doubt someone who is DYING to play a game like Elden Ring needs to do so at that level of performance so they can justify playing at the park while their dog gets run over by a truck or whatever the fuck
 
Last edited:
I'm going to be bummed if there is NO way to achieve 60fps for those games. Moreover, if it can't achieve 60fps with FF7 Remake, Rebirth may be a LOT further away than I thought.

Kind of a bummer they don't go with a lower res, "stylized" model for the characters, something closer to the original artwork, maybe that would afford them the added processing power to hit 60 frames?
 
I'm going to be bummed if there is NO way to achieve 60fps for those games. Moreover, if it can't achieve 60fps with FF7 Remake, Rebirth may be a LOT further away than I thought.

Kind of a bummer they don't go with a lower res, "stylized" model for the characters, something closer to the original artwork, maybe that would afford them the added processing power to hit 60 frames?
Calm down, you're getting Rebirth.
 
To be fair, I didn't buy a Switch to play graphic-heavy games. I mainly use the Switch in handheld mode and want to play games that are optimized for that experience including the UI and accessibility. If I think about playing Cyberpunk 2077, Elden Ring, or Final Fantasy VII Remake in handheld mode, my head explodes. Just the thought of handling the UI of those games in handheld mode is honestly kind of scary.
 
Cyberpunk has been confirmed to have a 40fps performance mode. Check my thread for the video.
My uncle at Nintendo sent me this leaked screenshot of it in action.

RVLMfaa.jpeg

/S before anybody comes at me.

In all seriousness I'm interested to see some detailed analysis of how it performs in the retail version as this is one have that is pushing a lot.

Also will be interesting to see if Nintendo censor the character creator
 
The crazy thing is that Nintendo want to charge $700 CAD post tax for a system with out of date hardware. The system is struggling to play cyberpunk at sub 1080p and struggling to hold 30fps. Why anyone would pay money for that is wild.
stop saying its out of date hardware. It's not like they took the old chip did nothing and released it. Its got all kinds of new features for gaming and AI.. Im not happy about the price either im more conserned with the game costs not the hardware. Anyone saying it's just an old chip are just looking to hate.
 
I watched the DF video of Cyberpunk, go watch too, they say it can go as low as 972p.

And I insist because it was super annoying to watch that video again

We'll see
I don't care anymore about numbers. What I care about is how it looks and feels. With DLSS and AI native pixels are becoming more and more irrelevant. If the game drops to 720p but the DLLS and AI get it to look like 1440p while I game why the hell do I care? Im not a pixel counter Im a gamer!
 
7DWBxli.jpeg


for this price, it should
You do realize that you can't compare handheld devices with stationary devices, right? There is an extra cost and compromise when making a gaming system portable. I mean, look at the gaming desktop PC and gaming laptop situation you get less gaming power for the same or even higher price than a gaming PC. Or am I wrong?
 
So?
It's a hybrid device that has to fit in a tiny case and run off a battery, expecting dedicated console performance is illogical.

I'll probably be picking up Cyberpunk on Switch 2, never in my life has 30fps stopped me enjoying a game.
 
It's literally running FF7 Remake the same as a base PS4 and this is Nintendo's "next-gen" console, this will be their console for the *next 8 years*, let that sink in. Of course, nobody buys a Nintendo console for the 3rd party titles but we've still got to call a duck a duck and this is one ugly fucking duck.
Honestly if you buy a game from the PS4 generation at full price, you should be considered not fit for society
 
It's literally running FF7 Remake the same as a base PS4 and this is Nintendo's "next-gen" console, this will be their console for the *next 8 years*, let that sink in. Of course, nobody buys a Nintendo console for the 3rd party titles but we've still got to call a duck a duck and this is one ugly fucking duck.

It's remake integrade though, based on the PS5 remaster, not the original PS4 release.
 
Nintendo finally delivers with the portable PS4 people wanted.

That said, there's more to graphics than resolution and fps. Switch 1 MK8 was 1080p60 and basically no other games on Switch 1 ever ran at those specs. I wonder what kind of settings these games will run at, hopefully above PS4 due to the more modern tech.
 
Switch 1 MK8 was 1080p60 and basically no other games on Switch 1 ever ran at those specs.

From memory, don't know the full list:
- Fast RMX
- ARMS
- Splatoon 2 (dynamic though)
- Super Mario 3D World
- New Super Mario Bros U Deluxe
- Super Smash Bros Ultimate
- Super Mario Bros Wonder
- Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze


The games like Super Mario Party, Jamboree, Mario Party Superstars should run at 1080p 60 too but no one made an analysis of these games
 
From memory, don't know the full list:
- Fast RMX
- ARMS
- Splatoon 2 (dynamic though)
- Super Mario 3D World
- New Super Mario Bros U Deluxe
- Super Smash Bros Ultimate
- Super Mario Bros Wonder
- Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze


The games like Super Mario Party, Jamboree, Mario Party Superstars should run at 1080p 60 too but no one made an analysis of these games
I don't remember Fast RMX being 1080p60, but it's been 8 years so who knows 😂 but yeah, besides Nintendo games you were looking at lower res and fps.
 
Top Bottom