http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=207457421&postcount=772 <- prior reads
Gryvann -
Day 1 he put down Xam, TWE, and Flame_AC as potential scum. But his next post isn't for any of them, but instead an easy "are you there" vote for Rats Off to Ya. Day 2 does another vote under the guise of "prodding". Says he hopes to change his vote to a "final vote" by the end of Day 2, but that didn't happen. He has thrown shade on Xam in each day phase, but never mustered a vote on him,
Perhaps scum-Gryvann wants to look contributing by labeling a handful of people as scummish, but doesn't want to pull the trigger and get connected to a potential mislynch. Instead he goes for the easier prod votes, which still look helpful.
lean-suspicious
Trigger -
Seems to blend well. His end of day votes for Day 1 and 2 were aimed at StarSketch. Day 1 was due to "gut" and staying under the radar. By Day 2 I expected a bit more reasoning but again Trigger went back to his initial gut read. To me, it can be a little too easy sticking to the gut alone, without any additional reasoning.
lean-null with a chance of suspicious
Rats Off -
Started Day 1 off being pretty fluffy, then got into a bit of conflict with cornbro, leading to a vote on corn. There was a sense of testiness between him and corn, maybe a little testier than warranted if this was a scumbro collusion play. I might be more confident about Rats if Corn was scum, and vice versa. At the moment, I feel OK giving him lean-slight town.
Blarg -
Trying to read him in mafia gives me diarrhea. But regardless, he hasn't played in a super helpful townie way. So I'll just throw an easy null read on him.
If anyone wants my thoughts on a specific individual, feel free to ask