But the Thorn didn't need any nerfing!! /s
Kill the shotgun blinkers and make sure the pulse rifles don't become the next meta and the PVP may actually become decent now.
Unless they introduce exotics with dramatically more interesting features, it's still the best weapon for PvE even with the nerf.
The real issue is that it has needed to be nerfed since Atheon. It is pretty damning that it took this long.I've had a Gally for a long time and even I get tired of the "just Gally it" strategy for 99% of all PVE activities.
It's for the best.
The way the game works, you can easily catch up at any time if you just slowly grind out the rep for your factions and buy the armor pieces. So there's never any real rush unless you are playing with friends, for what that's worth.ah i see, to be honest i wouldn't have noticed anything had it not been spelled out by eurogamer for me.... hell i haven't even reached level 30 yet.... i should put some decent effort into the game ha
and Ice Breaker (which will have its ammo-recharge effect slowed).
But the Thorn didn't need any nerfing!! /s
Kill the shotgun blinkers and make sure the pulse rifles don't become the next meta and the PVP may actually become decent now.
I really dont understand why people are so keen to see more diversity in the game. these questions is not aimed at you specifically so dont take offence. why do some player care what guns are being used in PVP? what benefit is it to you if there is a big difference in weapons being used? I just dont get it.
I play with the last word cause i find it to be a good gun and its fun to play with and it looks cool when shooting. I would never playing with an autorifle, scout,pulse, fusion as I dont find them to be fun to use.
A weapon that increases the time it takes for someone to recover essentially removing them from combat for an extended duration on top of great stability, range and damage didn't need to be nerfed?
A weapon that increases the time it takes for someone to recover essentially removing them from combat for an extended duration on top of great stability, range and damage didn't need to be nerfed?
I understand why they nerfed Ice Breaker. It basically ruined the Templar fight in VoG, all any group wanted to do was sit up on the cliff with icebreakers. Much more fun, and fairly easy, to do it legit. The nerf is pretty boring though. Has a high chance of not discouraging use of it, but just making use of it more dull.I have most of the exotics mentioned, and while I'm salty about the Gjallahorn, the one that really gets me is the Ice Breaker. What on earth man? Bungie being Bungie.
It's used a lot more than most other weapons, that indicates that it's not that hard to use.It also kicks like a bitch and why its so polarising, some people can play well with it, some cannot.
Absolutely. I hope the fire rate nerf helps, doing headshots with pulse rifles is too easy with certain guns, especially at ranges in which scout/sniper rifles are specialized in.The shotguns needed a nerf badly.
The problem is pulse rifles and autos are too easy to use, there needs to be a trade off. I will reserve judgement until I ahve played.
Thorn stacking 5 x poison sounds good for PVE.
Hehe it was sarcasm, hence the /s.A weapon that increases the time it takes for someone to recover essentially removing them from combat for an extended duration on top of great stability, range and damage didn't need to be nerfed?
It also kicks like a bitch and why its so polarising, some people can play well with it, some cannot.
Landing 2 headstots sounds easy buyt with the kick taking time to stabilise more than say a hawkmoon or TLW....
What the fuck am I reading. Thorn and bitch to use? Lololol
But the Thorn didn't need any nerfing!! /s
Kill the shotgun blinkers and make sure the pulse rifles don't become the next meta and the PVP may actually become decent now.
"Come back to Destiny! We nerfed all your guns!"
I really dont understand why people are so keen to see more diversity in the game. these questions is not aimed at you specifically so dont take offence. why do some player care what guns are being used in PVP? what benefit is it to you if there is a big difference in weapons being used? I just dont get it.
I play with the last word cause i find it to be a good gun and its fun to play with and it looks cool when shooting. I would never playing with an autorifle, scout,pulse, fusion as I dont find them to be fun to use.
For me, the Black Hammer nerf hurts the most (and yes, I have a GHorn, 2 actually).
Yep. RIP, all my favorite weapons.Glad I'm sticking with Warframe.
I understand why they nerfed Ice Breaker. It basically ruined the Templar fight in VoG, all any group wanted to do was sit up on the cliff with icebreakers. Much more fun, and fairly easy, to do it legit. The nerf is pretty boring though. Has a high chance of not discouraging use of it, but just making use of it more dull.
It's used a lot more than most other weapons, that indicates that it's not that hard to use.
This is how I feel. Gjallarhorn doesn't bother me.
Lol please. A double tap is a guaranteed kill in .4s. That's a full 50% faster than Red Death or Hawkmoon (tied if Hawkmoon gets a lucky bullet though).Thorn was not that much better than red death or hawkmoon, now it will just be red death and hawkmoon and Suros....and one will shine but who knows.
We already discussed the Thorn so I'm not going to play the "yes it is/no it isn't" game again.Thorn was not that much better than red death or hawkmoon, now it will just be red death and hawkmoon and Suros....and one will shine but who knows.
so instead of nerfing Thorn and TLW, which kill ~50%+ more quickly than everything else you'd rather see the entire Arsenal of hundreds of weapons buffed to that silly level?Im officailly done with destiny. They should fix balance by better variety in enemies and proper all around buffs.
Just feels to me that this is a preempt to ensure taken king weapons are desirable.
It's a major change to the dynamics of the game, of course it does.
There were similar thread for WoW re-tunes so why not this?
Destiny is an extremely popular game, no matter what GAF like to think/say.
Glad I'm sticking with Warframe.
I mean, all this means is that everyone will use Red Death or some other high impact pulse rifle now. People will still use the exact same snipers and shotguns as before, so for PvP, it's still exactly the same.so instead of nerfing Thorn and TLW, which kill ~50%+ more quickly than everything else you'd rather see the entire Arsenal of hundreds of weapons buffed to that silly level?
You end up with a CoD style crap fest, no thanks. When you have outliers, you fix the outliers. You don't drag the entire population to the point where were all dying in .5s with no time to react.
The only people who say a hunger is fine if you don't have a Gjallahorn....never had a Gjallahorn.Dont have a Gally, never dropped for me, never needed it with a 365 Hunger...will not need it now thats for sure.
I mean, all this means is that everyone will use Red Death or some other high impact pulse rifle now. People will still use the exact same snipers and shotguns as before, so for PvP, it's still exactly the same.
So tell me, PS4 players, how much should us Xbox players look forward to the hawk moon now that it's being nerfed?
Thats crap and you know it. They buffed Autos and short / mid range fusion rifles.
Also Thorn is a rebalance, 5 DOT stacks is pretty handy.
Still think PVE will become scout rifle land.
Oh yeah, that's true.Average TTK across all weapons in PvP is being edged down which is the most important thing.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-bungie-nerfing-gjallerhorn-destiny
Save the Ghorn! 😂
so instead of nerfing Thorn and TLW, which kill ~50%+ more quickly than everything else you'd rather see the entire Arsenal of hundreds of weapons buffed to that silly level?
You end up with a CoD style crap fest, no thanks. When you have outliers, you fix the outliers. You don't drag the entire population to the point where were all dying in .5s with no time to react.