Fake
Member
It used 2015 technology no?
Nvidia Tegra X1 2015.
My bad, 2015.
It used 2015 technology no?
Nvidia Tegra X1 2015.
nope, this is outlandish wishful thinkingPretty much. And with better CPU, way more RAM and DLSS it will give significantly better results than standard PS4.
More ports wille possible from PS5 (vs S1) but of course not all games will be ported.
I have been saying for some time now that there is a huge difference between using DLSS on a stationary PC with a power budget of 500W with desktop class GPU and CPU to a 15W handheld that will have an extremely barebones CPU and GPU. DLSS isn't "free". Especially when having a low native resolution to work with, DLSS isn't the silver bullet to bad performance that it has proven on PC. I think Nintendo fans will have to accept being disappointed this gen in terms of tech.Hope this throws some cold water on the people who expect DLSS to do major heavy lifting in this console. It's highly doubtful we are going to see 4K DLSS output on this console even in docked. We likely won't see it at all in handheld.
The two base models are $299. The Mario Kart 9 bundle is $349.The rumoured launch price is $399 with Nintendo wanting decent profits per unit since day one.
People need to understand the profit methodology of Nintendo are a combination of great software plus a cheap hardware to manufacture.
Processing node isn't the only relevant tech on Switch 2. It doesn't surprise me it might be able to outperform other more expensive portable devices thanks to the Nvidia tech and Nintendo optimization.I expected better tech than 8nm. I don't find that unreasonable.
8nm in 2025 isn't cutting it. Nintendo could've taken a loss on the hardware in exchange for putting better hardware inside of the switch 2. 8nm tells us that they wanna make a profit on launch day and will essentially handicap their first party devs the entire generation because of that decision. Nintendo are a big enough corporation to cut a better deal in terms of producing the chip necessary to produce a more powerful console than asus are with the ROG ALLY X.
People seem to think DLSS is free because they turn it on and get performance improvements for seemingly nothing. They don’t know what goes on behind the scenes or that engaging the DLSS routines with the GPU costs power.I have been saying for some time now that there is a huge difference between using DLSS on a stationary PC with a power budget of 500W with desktop class GPU and CPU to a 15W handheld that will have an extremely barebones CPU and GPU. DLSS isn't "free". Especially when having a low native resolution to work with, DLSS isn't the silver bullet to bad performance that it has proven on PC. I think Nintendo fans will have to accept being disappointed this gen in terms of tech.
Yeah, Nah, $399 without any game for the base model.The two base models are $299. The Mario Kart 9 bundle is $349.
Nintendo and their own secret sauce.Processing node isn't the only relevant tech on Switch 2. It doesn't surprise me it might be able to outperform other more expensive portable devices thanks to the Nvidia tech and Nintendo optimization
Wasn't that John himself who mentioned that via Twitter?There we go:
Anyone still expecting PS4 Pro performance level?
Software is too sparse for my liking. He gone years without turning my switch on
They need to start making more ambitious games
The Steam deck might be old, but not much has changed in the handheld space. New handhelds that released this year are barely an improvement in the same TDP. Whatever Nintendo did, it would have been underpowered anyway. They just chose to make as much money as possible which we kinda knew anyway. Until tech has advanced enough for a Deck 2, I suspect the Switch 2 will be quite impressive as the only modern handheld using Nvidia tech.Steam deck also came out in 2022 and was pretty good at the time. The only reason nintendo are launching a console this underpowered and going to charge a ridiculous price for it is because they know they can get away with it and they want to make as much of a profit as possible off of junk hardware. 8nm is an embarrassment in 2025 especially at the price they're going for.
True they have some great IPs like XC and it would be nice to even play a Zelda game that looks like it doesn't take place on a pool table.Software is too sparse for my liking. He gone years without turning my switch on
They need to start making more ambitious games
No, they have never done that, why would they do that to keep fanboys and hatersNintendo could've taken a loss on the hardware
8nm in 2025 isn't cutting it. Nintendo could've taken a loss on the hardware in exchange for putting better hardware inside of the switch 2. 8nm tells us that they wanna make a profit on launch day and will essentially handicap their first party devs the entire generation because of that decision. Nintendo are a big enough corporation to cut a better deal in terms of producing the chip necessary to produce a more powerful console than asus are with the ROG ALLY X.
No, they have never done that, why would they do that to keep fanboys and haters
Should very better this time as Nintendo aren't using an "off the shelf" SoC.My bad, 2015.
What makes you say this? Seems very optimistic.The two base models are $299. The Mario Kart 9 bundle is $349.
The gamecube was sold at a loss on launch i believe as well as the n64.
who cares about Specs. i want to see GAMES
Sure, true.Games > Specs
When it comes to handhelds, we are at this point where:The Steam deck might be old, but not much has changed in the handheld space. New handhelds that released this year are barely an improvement in the same TDP. Whatever Nintendo did, it would have been underpowered anyway. They just chose to make as much money as possible which we kinda knew anyway. Until tech has advanced enough for a Deck 2, I suspect the Switch 2 will be quite impressive as the only modern handheld using Nvidia tech.
Zelda TOTK won best technology award in 2023 despite being a Switch game. Digital Foundry themselves complimented Nintendo for punching above its weight.Yeah, Nah, $399 without any game for the base model.
Nintendo and their own secret sauce.
i dont play any games on my switch because of its specs so. no thxGames > Specs
8nm in 2025 isn't cutting it. Nintendo could've taken a loss on the hardware in exchange for putting better hardware inside of the switch 2. 8nm tells us that they wanna make a profit on launch day and will essentially handicap their first party devs the entire generation because of that decision. Nintendo are a big enough corporation to cut a better deal in terms of producing the chip necessary to produce a more powerful console than asus are with the ROG ALLY X.
???Doubt that, the developers who did the heavy lifting on these emulators were politely asked to stop doing so by Nintendo.
There might be forks and clones but none of them have decent dev activity where it matters.
GTA6 will look impressive in this thing!
Lmao
Of course, it was obvious.I'm convinced this is why they've been so heavyhanded with it recently. This thing is likely going to be emulated in no time if people aren't threatened.
HW Performance level? No and i dont care about that.There we go:
Anyone still expecting PS4 Pro performance level?
They wouldn't take a loss if they went smaller than 8nm; it might cost them an extra $15.00 at the most.
That remaster looks like a steaming turd compared to Astro, also costs 60$ to boot thanks to scrooge ass Nintendo. The mushrooms in the background probably have more polygons than the metroid MC.Zelda TOTK won best technology award in 2023 despite being a Switch game. Digital Foundry themselves complimented Nintendo for punching above its weight.
Just imagine what Nintendo capable on a system roughly 4-5 times more powerful than Switch
I'd prefer this
Pushing the system to its limit
Instead of this
Not fully utilising system power
Zelda TOTK won best technology award in 2023 despite being a Switch game. Digital Foundry themselves complimented Nintendo for punching above its weight.
Just imagine what Nintendo capable on a system roughly 4-5 times more powerful than Switch
I'd prefer this
Pushing the system to its limit
Instead of this
Not fully utilising system power
Zelda TOTK won best technology award in 2023 despite being a Switch game. Digital Foundry themselves complimented Nintendo for punching above its weight.
Just imagine what Nintendo capable on a system roughly 4-5 times more powerful than Switch
I'd prefer this
Pushing the system to its limit
Instead of this
Not fully utilising system power