• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

EA sucks

arbok26 said:
3. Need for Speed series has been ruined... well it was never that great, but still.... there's no identity anymore with hot pursuit, shift and whatever else coming under the need for speed label... just seems very random.
i disagree with this emphatically. Hot Pursuit and Shift 2 are much better games than we'd been getting in the series for years.
 
Hypertrooper said:
EA did something that Activision hadn't done: They published Brütal Legend. <3

That turned out to be the best decision Activision's made this gen. Words cannot describe how awful that game was.
 
OP hates capitalism confirmed :P Same criticism could be applied to at least 50% of pubs in the industry.

Nah, EA is cool with me. If they make games I'm interested in, then I buy their product(s). It's a simple concept. I plan on buying NCAA 12, ME3 and Dead Space 2 (when it goes on sale) this year.
 
EA is pretty awful, and I'm just going by their current-gen actions, not even talking about the giant 60 foot tall mountain of shit they erected in the 1990's and early 2000's (part of which Riccitello was in charge too).

The preorder shit, the "time saver" dlc, Dragon Age 2, project ten dollar, rip-off DLC, shutting down Pandemic, etc. etc. etc. Once The Old Republic bombs, Bioware will be turned into Bullfrog/Westwood/Origin/etc. Count on it. And people hate on Activision for the 5000 GH games released over 3 years, but really EA/Harmonix was almost as bad.

It's all pretty terrible, and I only tolerate it because they have talented staff making great games. It's tough to be a gamer nowadays and ignore EA's stuff.
 
while delivering a strong product with a unique, but failed feature (first person football). What's not to love about that?


wasn't unique, Joe Montana for Sega CD had this...

2k was a good series, but it had it's share of gameplay issues.
 
Ickman3400 said:
EA's disrespect of Steam is enough for me to hate them. No one wants to use your shitty service EA, give it up. People say Activision is worse but other than $60 price point they don't disrespect Steam at all.

Their games aren't even that great anymore. I don't know if they're the cause of Bioware sucking or Bioware went down this road themself but ever since that purchase deal went into effect Bioware has put out nothing but mediocrity (ME1 was before the deal). Dead Space 2 is almost a carbon copy of 1, Crysis 2 is consolized, most of their sports games blow now, they've smothered mirror's edge, one of the most unique games this gen because it didn't sell 100 million copies.

Their preorder bullshit is annoying at best, they charge for cheat codes and unlocks, they charge for online now, their DRM is ridiculous, their customer service is atrocious, and their online servers blow...bad. EVERY SINGLE GAME from them has online issues at release, even when it's not an online game like DA2 or ME2.

EA is a complete joke of a company that gets a pass from a lot of people because they've put out a couple ok games the last few years and because Activision came in and stole the asshole crown which lets EA fly under the radar. They're no different from each other.
Damn, how did I forget about this. Shit is fucking annoying.
 
Snuggler said:
[The murder of one of the greatest sports series in gaming]

KQQGR.jpg

I'D MADE MYSELF FORGET! WHY DID YOU HAVE TO REMIND ME?!
 
Why so much hate for Activision? I understand that they milk games, but who doesn't? If you don't like Call of Duty, then pretty much any reason to hate Activision is thrown out the window. EA milks many franchises just like Activision does but at the same time they throw in preorder shenanigans, buying out competition via exclusive licenses, DLC on the fucking disc, selling you cheat codes, selling you quick unlock packs, encouraging you to spam the inbox of your online friends in EA demos (send this message to 5 friends and receive *insert item here*), etc etc.

At least with an Activision game, you buy it and you're done. You don't need an Activision account to confirm and then link to your online ID, you don't need to pray that Activision's servers are working properly when you input your "online pass" code, you aren't constantly offered quick unlock packs or cheat codes. I could only imagine Call of Duty as an EA title. Instead of 16 maps or whatever that Blops launched with, it would be maybe 8. And of those 8 you'd probably have 4 game modes open, each playable on 2 maps. Then slowly they would unlock the other modes on other maps and then eventually unlock the rest of the 16 maps and market them as free map packs. What a deal! And every time you die they try to sell you something. Get killed by a chopper? Buy the Launcher Pack for only $5 and unlock your Strela/RPG now! Killed by a nade? Buy the Armor pack, giving you more speed (marathon) and extra armor against grenades (hardened) right away! And so on and so forth. Hell Call of Duty has CoD points, EA would just sell you those. Maybe it would be 2 for 1 like food stamps?

Fuck EA.
 
I've never been a fan of EA (especially after gutting some great companies and killing off some awesome series like Ultima), but I've bought more EA games this gen than any other gen since the Genesis. I appreciate that they want to create some new and creative IPs, even if the way they go about things is somewhat misguided (shitty marketing, excess DLC).

duckroll said:
I'm pretty sure it's a cycle. Every generation or two, EA and Activision switch places. :P

Maybe I've just not been paying attention, but after the Atari generation, I felt that Activision was pretty quiet... up til the PS2 era and Tony Hawk/Guitar Hero/COD.
 
I started watching the Dragon Age Trailer.

Pretty awesome.

Then I realized it's a fan video. It should be removed from OP.

Also, I have the AKS-74U in BF:BC2 so... the pre order points fall flat on me.
 
wwm0nkey said:
EA > Activision.

Also at least they are putting new IP's out on the market.
This is true but I don't like how it seems that EA is regressing to their old self in the early 2000's when they were hated by everyone before Activision took that mantle from them. Thats what it seems like to me anyways.

Edit: Fuck the online pass all the way to hell and back though.
 
diffusionx said:
And people hate on Activision for the 5000 GH games released over 3 years, but really EA/Harmonix was almost as bad.
EA only distributed Rock Band. MTV was the publisher, so EA had nothing to do with anything Rock Band beside shipping it to stores and some marketing I think.
 
I agree with OP, hopefully more people understand how awful they are and stop buying their products. Has been years since my last EA purchase, have rented a few titles which reminded me why I hate them, and couldn't be happier.
 
EA publishes good games. I enjoy them; they are fun. However, EA hires complete morons with embellished senses of entitlement and working with them is a chore. At the end of the day, I think gamers are the only ones who actually have the leg up haha.
 
I think that the problem's root is that EA grew too big and want to control everything.
The first repercussion of their size is that all their games are made into the same framework: from the advertising, the tons of logos when you start the game, their shitty packaging... etc.
In that way I have the impression that their games are made by a machine even if the content is very different.
I am sure if Dragon Age was published by another company, it would not have this nasty feeling or aftertaste.
They want to control everything, that's why they built up their own shitty networking system. You have to register and login every time you start one of their games. The link with their own forum makes things even worse...

I had a bit of hope in the beginning of this generation when I saw many new IPs but this hope turned out quickly to a nightmare. For them, games are just a consumable products, nothing else. That makes me sad because they own many interesting IPs...
 
Snuggler said:
ead7mi.gif


EA sucks.

You may be thinking, URNT THEY A BUSINESS? THERE SUPPOSED TO MAKE MUNNY. You are right, but I am neither an EA employee or shareholder, I'm a gamer. And this is a thread about how much they suck and why.


EA happens to publish a lot of games I like, and that's the problem. This could be a thread about Activision, but really, I stopped letting them sucker me into buying Call of Duty games a few years ago. When it comes to my gaming interests, they are practically irrelevant, but this is not the case with EA. Their involvement in the games I like is similar to finding a pubey looking hair in a delicious sandwich. I can still enjoy it, but it's just not the same. There is no avoiding them as well, they are one of the biggest megapublishers in the business, no matter your taste your are likely to have an interest in some of their products.

They somehow managed to earn some goodwill back in '08 after publishing Mirror's Edge and Dead Space, but it was short lived. Maybe people were just eager to cling to someone nicer than Activision, who was just a bit too eager to fuck them in the ass. However, we were quickly reminded of why they may be one of the greediest and most anti-consumer publishers in the biz.


But why do they suck? Let's take a look.




[Preorder Bullshit]

Preorder bullshit is all the rage these days, and EA does it like no one else. Despite the image, it goes beyond simple, petty trinkets and outfits. Legitimate consumers who buy their games new have to deal with redeeming online pass codes, or signing up for EA accounts then linking them to Bioware social accounts then linking their gamertag/ID to those accounts in order to redeem the content that comes with the product they paid for. Jumping through hoops has never been so shitty. Loyal customers who don't buy used are rewarded by junkmail newsletters and needless headaches.

Then don't get the pre-order stuff. What's the problem. If you want it, there is a cost for it and that is following their process.


[Marketing]


If EA's perception of you is correct, you are a sex-deprived, gore-obessed, sad manchild who is only impressed by the most XTREME of extremes. Let's enjoy a few trailers:

Dragon Age: Origins - This is the New Shit
Mass Effect 2 - Subject Zero
Dead Space 2 - Ur Mom Hates Dead Space


As a moderately intelligent adult, I can't help but feel like they want me to hate these games.

The only one I have a problem with is the DS2 ads. Those ads were so juvenile and reinforced what critics have said about the attitudes of the industry. Very poor form. But others? Fine by me!

[The murder of one of the greatest sports series in gaming]

Some of us may remember a certain series titled NFL2K, or ESPN NFL2K. Many other NFL series like Quarterback Club or Gameday may have deserved their fate, but 2K did not. Throughout the five years they existed, they consistently delivered a solid product that rivaled Madden. 2K decided that they would take an unconventional approach with ESPN NFL2K5. Instead of charging full price for a glorified roster update, they decided to charge $20 at launch while delivering a strong product with a unique, but failed feature (first person football). What's not to love about that?

Rather than matching that price point, creating innovative features or creating a superior product, EA did what they know best: they threw money at it. EA purchased exclusive rights to the NFL license, crushing NFL2K to death under massive mounds of money and subjecting NFL fans to nothing but years and years of guaranteed mediocre and unambitious iterations. Rather than convincing games to chose their games, they took away the choice altogether. Lovely, isn't it?

As much as I loved 2K, they are not totally innocent in all of this. $20 new at retail? They were trying to buy the market at that price point. This was a loss leader to get ahead of the Madden audience while they had a hot product. So, EA responded in kind and won the open bid that the NFL had for the licensing. That's business. 2K pushed, EA responded.

____

There, I said it. EA sucks...but this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Feel free to:

1. Agree with my facts
2. Add your own reasons
3. Tell me what an asshole I am


Two big topics I didn't touch in this: their refusal to support the Dreamcast, and their fear of Steam.
 
I'll never forgive EA for what they did to Westwood and Bullfrog.

And Dragon Age and Mass Effect were before EA's acquisition of Bioware. Notice ME's DLC in contrast to ME2's. Although Bioware and the Doctors surely have a hand in becoming such a simpleton development studio, EA's fingerprints are all over DA2 and ME2.

The problem with EA is that there exists both commercial and creative forces inside the company. The latter wants to greenlight more experimental projects, so we get Mirror's Edge, Dead Space and Alice: Madness Returns. The former tries to squeeze every single penny out of a project via DLC, marketing, DRM, 60 dollars PC versions, etc. So it's really annoying that one wants to play some of their better games while also realizing one is supporting those atrocious business practices EA employs.

Btw, Snuggler: Your Dragon Age: New Shit video isn't the correct one. This is the one that was released to the public: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8E1kG3IbTI (shitty writing and animations)
 
The only thing that has really annoyed me lately is the 50 dollars (more if you buy them separate) in extra courses that they put out on day 1 for Tiger Woods to exploit the dwindling fanbase for that series.

Also, killing Wing Commander sucked.
 
cRIPticon said:
Then don't get the pre-order stuff. What's the problem. If you want it, there is a cost for it and that is following their process.
Unique pre order per retailer, and the bonuses not being available in all regions make them shite. Pre order bonuses, even when not done wrong, are just shite.
 
Dead Man said:
Unique pre order per retailer, and the bonuses not being available in all regions make them shite. Pre order bonuses, even when not done wrong, are just shite.

Not to mention the fact that they inevitably go on sale as overpriced DLC for everyone. The stuff is done during development, included on the disc, priced at $0 (to move preorders), and after the game comes out it goes on sale for everyone at ripoff prices. Even if I was a good EA lemming-citizen I still would have to buy a bunch of shit unless I preordered 4+ copies of the game. Fuck preorder bonuses.
 
Dead Man said:
Unique pre order per retailer, and the bonuses not being available in all regions make them shite. Pre order bonuses, even when not done wrong, are just shite.
It's extra stuff you don't need to play the game.

Get over it, you and the OP.
 
diffusionx said:
Not to mention the fact that they inevitably go on sale as overpriced DLC for everyone. The stuff is done during development, included on the disc, priced at $0 (to move preorders), and after the game comes out it goes on sale for everyone at ripoff prices. Even if I was a good EA lemming-citizen I still would have to buy a bunch of shit unless I preordered 4+ copies of the game. Fuck preorder bonuses.

The DLC has gotten so out of hand that I just wait until the Game of the Year edition sale on Steam. I'm tired of buying half the game at launch, so I wait until they sell the whole game for a reasonable price.
 
cRIPticon said:
As much as I loved 2K, they are not totally innocent in all of this. $20 new at retail? They were trying to buy the market at that price point. This was a loss leader to get ahead of the Madden audience while they had a hot product. So, EA responded in kind and won the open bid that the NFL had for the licensing. That's business. 2K pushed, EA responded.

And that's pefectly fine, the issue is what EA has done from that point on.

If EA wanted to, they could make a fantastic football game instead of the average one they make now. We all konw Tiburon can do it because they've done it before (Madden 04 and 05 were great).

I have no issue with EA getting the license, its what they've done with it that pisses me off. The act of EA getting the license isn't the reason why Madden sucks, its because EA doesn't want to the put the time, effort and money into making it a quality product when its going to sell the same regardless.

Its the perfect scenario for EA. They get to 1/2 ass their game and it will still make them money.

levious said:
wasn't unique, Joe Montana for Sega CD had this...

2k was a good series, but it had it's share of gameplay issues.

Of course 2k5 had issues, what game doesn't. The problem is that we never got to see them correct those issues and all of the issues Madden had last gen are bigger problems this gen due to the lack of competition.
 
I thought it was a known fact that the NFL was shopping their rights around well before 2005. EA only did what they had to do to survive in that market. It does suck, but its sound business.
 
linkboy said:
I have no issue with EA getting the license, its what they've done with it that pisses me off. The act of EA getting the license isn't the reason why Madden sucks, its because EA doesn't want to the put the time, effort and money into making it a quality product when its going to sell the same regardless.

The act of EA getting the license is the reason why Madden sucks. Do you think that it is a coincidence that the two best Madden games came out in the years when competition was fiercest?

Think of how much EA improved FIFA. Would they have done that if PES did not exist? No way.
 
So EA sucks because of pre-order bonuses that every other publisher this gen is doing + lame marketing (who cares?) + an NFL exclusive agreement that the NFL itself wanted to happen? Really?
 
I can live with preorder guns armour and shit...hell, I can live with exclusive missions as long as they aren't integral to the games plot.

The one thing I am dead set against is having to be online to play games. My gaming computer is offline only to keep it running at optimal. No virus software, no adware/spyware removers etc. Keep it clean. Unfortunately, that precludes me from PC gaming for the most part anymore.

So the fact that EA is pushing harder for online linking bothers me. Mass Effect etc keeps me going back to EA to buy games, albeit on consoles. I have all but cut out Acticriminal, although I will make an exception for Diablo 3 (which of course will probably require an online account to play).

Actually...fuck all these companies. Depending on how the rest of this console gen plays out, on top of looming bandwidth caps and such, I might sit out of gaming for awhile.
 
EA is the reason I've given up on Bioware.
Seriously, they were good and I did buy almost all their games.
There was a time when buying a game based on the developer meant something...
 
Since I mostly do console gaming I like EA. Dead Space and Mirrors Edge were great new IP's and at least DS got a sequel, an awesome one at that.

All of the preorder junk doesn't bother me so much. The marketing? Eh, again I care about the games not the adverts. Also, Dead Space 2 sold pretty well right?

I agree their PC rules could change but so could a lot of companies.
 
Snuggler said:
[The murder of one of the greatest sports series in gaming]

KQQGR.jpg


Some of us may remember a certain series titled NFL2K, or ESPN NFL2K. Many other NFL series like Quarterback Club or Gameday may have deserved their fate, but 2K did not. Throughout the five years they existed, they consistently delivered a solid product that rivaled Madden. 2K decided that they would take an unconventional approach with ESPN NFL2K5. Instead of charging full price for a glorified roster update, they decided to charge $20 at launch while delivering a strong product with a unique, but failed feature (first person football). What's not to love about that?

Rather than matching that price point, creating innovative features or creating a superior product, EA did what they know best: they threw money at it. EA purchased exclusive rights to the NFL license, crushing NFL2K to death under massive mounds of money and subjecting NFL fans to nothing but years and years of guaranteed mediocre and unambitious iterations. Rather than convincing games to chose their games, they took away the choice altogether. Lovely, isn't it?

____


share

Give it up with the 2K grudge, Sega/2K tried to drag EA into a ridiculous price war, instead of simply playing along, EA dropkicked them in the face, Sega/2K got what's coming to them.

Anyway I can't say I'm a big EA fan since I don't like any of their Bioware IPs and they nickel and dime too much on their stuff, I might or might not buy BF3, but that's the extent of my interest in EA products.
 
Heavy said:
So EA sucks because of pre-order bonuses that every other publisher this gen is doing
Are they?

Portal 2: Pre-Order Portal 2 on Steam and get Portal for free / Pre-Order Portal 2 Retail and get Cosmetic Armor in-game.
Pre-Order Donkey Kong Country Returns and get a free t-shirt! (this one wasn't even Nintendo doing it)
Pre-Order [PC Steam Game] get [TF2 Item]. Everyone else has to wait 2 weeks before getting the purely cosmetic item (for free).

I actually had a hard time thinking of many other pre-order bonuses. I mean, the "exclusive" pre-order bonus for Goldeneye was a code for invisibility mode, which every single person on the planet could use whether they pre-ordered or not.
The pre-order bonus for Pokemon Black/White was a Celebi download, but anyone could get that even without pre-ordering.
A lot of games give stuff like guides of extra money in the game, those are pointless in the bigger picture. Early access stuff like elite armor or whatever are harmless.


But EA gives exclusive levels, characters, weapons, or whole story elements as pre-order DLC, like with Dragon Age. No other publisher does it on such a large scale.
 
EA does not suck. They've published some of the best games this generation. I can understand your disdain for them because the 2K series *was* indeed glorious, but if you're bent out of shape over the way they market games and pre-order incentives, then I feel sorry for you.

Chill out, man. Have a beer.
 
Eversynth said:
EA is the reason I've given up on Bioware.
Seriously, they were good and I did buy almost all their games.
There was a time when buying a game based on the developer meant something...
Sadly Bioware set their current course before they were acquired by EA
 
Heavy said:
So EA sucks because of pre-order bonuses that every other publisher this gen is doing + lame marketing (who cares?) + an NFL exclusive agreement that the NFL itself wanted to happen? Really?

Come on man it's way more than just that. Read the thread, especially my slightly long post on it.
 
CoffeeJanitor said:
EA does completely suck. Their moneywhoring of the industry is quite annoying.

Anyone who supports DLC is just supporting getting effed over.
What if you don't support DLC or pre-order crap like different skins or models (seriously, who cares about that?) and still like the games?
 
I can agree that a lot of what they do is despicable, but exclusive stuff for pre-ordering at a specific shop is not one of them - I sell the codes on eBay to get a ton of money back from eagre fans. I got Mass Effect 2 for £6 on launch day because I got £20 for the Terminus Armor code. Most of it is inconsequential shit like that and bonus weapons anyway, so I don't see it as a big issue if I miss out. Take2's treatment of L.A. Noire is a whole lot worse than any EA game because they on the other hand actually cut gameplay.
 
balladofwindfishes said:
But EA gives exclusive levels, characters, weapons, or whole story elements as pre-order DLC, like with Dragon Age. No other publisher does it on such a large scale.

...LA Noire?
 
Top Bottom