Game development in general is rough, from what I hear. Which is why I find it patently ridiculous how harsh people are being over what amounts to tiny details. People aren't even just calling it out anymore, they're straight up reveling in the negativity.
Yeah, it's pretty inflammatorySo clear from the topic title that OP was running his hands with glee when he put this up
Because they're ideals, there's a difference between being attractive in general and being conventionally attractive like a super model.They're pretty damn attractive people. Same with default male Shepard and default male Ryder. None of those are average looking self inserts
Combating sexism and racism in the industry are equally valid goals.Do you understand that saying things like "you're part of the problem" is probably one of the most insulting things you can say to someone? You're completely dismissing any and all frame of reference the other party might have because they don't agree with you. Despite what a lot of people here might think, the attractiveness of characters in video games is *NOT* just as important an issue as combating racism.
That's what it seems like people are saying when they photoshop game characters to fit very specific standards of beauty.Just because you want someone in a game to be attractive doesn't mean you want to fuck them, my dude.
That picture is all that needs to be said.I'm sure there are celebrities that you think are ugly, that other people think are attractive. I think you're taking one point, which is "I don't like how FemRyder looks" and presuming several different things about the poster because of it.
The hell is perceived sexism. Men not getting sexist shit is how this industry ended up in this state in the first place. Just because you don't get it doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist.I think FemRyder is unattractive, personally. I don't care if she's a self-insert for the player, because I'm going to be staring at her face for countless hours. If Steve Buscemi was the target for Joel in TLoU, I probably wouldn't have played TLoU.
Now, a good counter-point to this, which is the reason I don't really give a crap if she's attractive or not, is that you can customize the character. So if I want to be Shrek, the Pathfinder, I can be-- green skin and all. Or, I can be <insert your celebrity of choice>. In ME1, I made my male Shepard super attractive. I was Hotty McBody.
The point that I'm trying to get across is that we're not going to solve anything by talking about how minorities are represented in video games. Pointing out misrepresentation is well intentioned, but is more or less pointing out "perceived racism," when the intent behind the representation isn't inherently racist. Same thing with gender representation and perceived sexism. For every post about how it's stupid that the armor for every JRPG female ever is bikinis, there isn't a single post pointing out that Batman's armor literally has abs. Batman is supposed to be sexy in a way, as are those armors-- those were intentionally designed that way. Video games are an entertainment medium, and as such, you should be able to interact with them whatever way you like. There isn't a wrong way to interact with your game.
Fem Ryder and Peebee need v shaped chins, thinner faces, and more makeup like other video game characters is pretty authoritarian.There's a very thin line between being progressive, and being authoritarian. You perceive something as giving someone more rights, someone else perceives it as their rights being taken away. This is why conversing about it in a serious manner that doesn't fucking involve "you're part of the problem" is so crucial, because by saying "you're part of the problem," when things go wrong, it's your fault for dismissing both fair and unfair criticism of your platform.
The writing and tone shifts from mere sentence to sentence conversations is just...really awkward and borderline terrible imo. Listen to the video linked if you want to hear it in context. It doesn't help, it just makes it worse imo.
Lines like this:
source: https://youtu.be/Vss92x8YaF0?t=1h37m56s
I mean...it's a valid thing to say...I guess? I'm sorry, my face is tired from dealing with everything? Huh? You could say this is nit picking, but for a game series that prides itself on character interaction, I'm consistently finding the animations, transitions, tone, and writing to be really off putting and bizzare.
Game development in general is rough, from what I hear. Which is why I find it patently ridiculous how harsh people are being over what amounts to tiny details. People aren't even just calling it out anymore, they're straight up reveling in the negativity.
I'm not sure what difference you mean. Point is, those player inserts are clearly meant to be hot. So your argument that she's not hot because she's a player insert doesn't make sense.Because they're ideals, there's a difference between being attractive in general and being conventionally attractive like a super model. .
has this thread really devolved into the lady isn't pretty enoughI'm not sure what difference you mean. Point is, those player inserts are clearly meant to be hot. So your argument that she's not hot because she's a player insert doesn't make sense.
While that is certainly true, I wouldn't point it out if it was the normal level of roughness...Game development in general is rough, from what I hear. Which is why I find it patently ridiculous how harsh people are being over what amounts to tiny details. People aren't even just calling it out anymore, they're straight up reveling in the negativity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9fm_54DboE
Giant Bomb is streaming now... pretty negative impressions from the crew so far.
Horizons janky animations are far more jarring to me than ME:A because the faces look so beautiful and realistic my brain expects the same from the facial animations... But then when they start it rips me from my immersion.
With ME:A the faces look only a little better than the animations. So I'm not looking at the face and expecting amazingness. I'm expecting the same standard as I've been seeing so when the animations start it's not as bad for me.
Do I think that the faces in Horizon overall look better? Absolutely.
But would I also rather the facial animations more closely matched the same fidelity of the rest of the face? Absolutely.
I wish that ME:A had better faces like Horizon and better animations to match them but am glad that neither outweigh each other so much that they are as immersion breaking as Horizon is for me.
I also think it's ok to call things out that you don't like or would like improved though so I'm ok with complaining about the animations. But it would be nice if this was equal from both sides and done in the name of actually improving the game with constructive criticism and not just fanboy game vs game wars.
Thing is, none of this means that either game isn't fun to play. As you can see, even with the janky animations from Horizon, people are still able to enjoy it and look past it.
I mean, think of some of your favorite games of all time from the past and think about some of the janky parts of them and how you where still able to have fun.
Game development in general is rough, from what I hear. Which is why I find it patently ridiculous how harsh people are being over what amounts to tiny details. People aren't even just calling it out anymore, they're straight up reveling in the negativity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9fm_54DboE
Giant Bomb is streaming now... pretty negative impressions from the crew so far.
She's a literal self insert for the player. She's not there for you to wanna fuck her my dude.
Yeah, it's pretty inflammatory
Nothing that people have pointed out as being """bad""" are enough to turn me away from this game. Mass Effect has always been kind of a tech mess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9fm_54DboE
Giant Bomb is streaming now... pretty negative impressions from the crew so far.
Yeah, sometimes the face looks good. But the speaking/mouth animation is nowhere near good. Its like a robot mouth moving up and down, no matter what is being said.
People just have it out for Bioware. Around these parts, the bar for being impressed by Bioware's work is significantly higher than other companies. It seems like Bioware would have to release a 12/10 to get any recognition, but Guerrilla Games has barely functioning facial animations for even the main character, and its great!
No it just looks really bad in spots there reaction is naturalThe Giant Bomb stream just looks like they're trying to make fun of everything. Guess it brings the views, but to contrast, I watched someone streaming it, and it was a waaaaay better indicator of if I'll like the game because he was just playing it instead of making a point to talk about how horrible the animations are 100% of the time.
The Giant Bomb stream just looks like they're trying to make fun of everything. Guess it brings the views, but to contrast, I watched someone streaming it, and it was a waaaaay better indicator of if I'll like the game because he was just playing it instead of making a point to talk about how horrible the animations are 100% of the time.
A little reminder from 2014:
This is most certainly NOT an issue of the engine.
One dude's opinion.
This is also the same guy that called playing Witcher 3 like, quote, "eating cardboard".
The Giant Bomb stream just looks like they're trying to make fun of everything. Guess it brings the views, but to contrast, I watched someone streaming it, and it was a waaaaay better indicator of if I'll like the game because he was just playing it instead of making a point to talk about how horrible the animations are 100% of the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9fm_54DboE
Giant Bomb is streaming now... pretty negative impressions from the crew so far.
Do we know all of the companions thus far?
Every person voice acting sounds so fucking bored.
I think most have a problem with the fact that she looks like a derpy wax robot instead of an actual human.has this thread really devolved into the lady isn't pretty enough