Depends how you interpret it. He could just go from the beginning and get to the end.
Whatever makes people in here the saltiest. That's what I want.
Depends how you interpret it. He could just go from the beginning and get to the end.
I missed it?!Part 1 of Kyle's LTTP playthrough was a masterpiece. Can't wait for Part 2.
Any such contract would either go to arbitration or to court, meaning up to interpretation of a neutral third party. As it stands it's pretty clear what the intent was, and what the interpretation of an unbiased observer would be.I wouldn't interpret it that way at all. None of you guys are familiar with contracts. I work with them on a daily basis. Interpretation is king. On several occasions my company has been screwed because the other end of the contract interpreted the meaning of the language differently. To Kyle, a complete full playthrough could mean start to finish, which includes the ability to glitch the game, since he starts and finishes. He should have included language that says no glitching
Huber's intent of the contract does not trump Kyle's intent.
On top of the fact that the "contract" was a joke to begin with and actually doesn't have REAL ramifications that affect Kyle in any meaningful way
.Great episode of Easy Update.
A glitch speed-run play-through could be arguably interpreted as being 'complete' but there's no way it would be 'full'. Welching on the spirit of the bet is lame enough as is, but to welch on the actual terms of the bet would be beyond lame. I don't think he'll weasel out of it anyway. Bosman knows his limits, and weaseling out of every single bet would get tiresome.
Any such contract would either go to arbitration or to court, meaning up to interpretation of a neutral third party. As it stands it's pretty clear what the intent was, and what the interpretation of an unbiased observer would be.
But yes, obviously presenting the bet in form of a contract was a joke -- about Bosman's probable welching of the bet.
Trolling and all... but always sneaking out of bets makes them less fun for me personally. Not a fan.
As a viewer, I think Kyle being the obvious villain makes the stakes of the bets all that much better, since we're all rooting for the virtuous Huber. He's like a evil Game of Thrones character now. At least when it comes to bets!
I would luke to add that the Zelda: Breath if the Wild footage narrated by Damiani totally changed my opinion on that game. I'm gonna buy an NX for it now for sure. For some reason the footage released didn't wow me until that and I'm pretty hype for it now
I actually feel the opposite. If Kyle weasels out of this I actually hope Huber calls off doing bets with him now, which I actually think he mentioned he will
i'mokaywiththis.pngBosman gonna get the betting red card and be suspended for the gamescom bets, will be Huber vs Ben instead.
The payment (such as it is) will be whatever Huber/the allies deem appropriate, since for these purposes (and in any bet-among-friends purposes) they're also the judge/jury. But real-world contracts are a super silly way to interpret this anyway...What is the payment to Huber for breaking the contract? There were no terms written if Bosman broke the contract. And honestly, what judge would look at this contract in any serious terms. Neither would Huber take this to court.
Looking at the terms given, I see no reason why Bosman couldn't glitch his way to the end. I don't consider a full run through the same as playing through every dungeon. The clearer language is beginning to end, which a glitched run through would suffice.
agree.Another great episode from Ian. Now, I feel boss man should honor the bet and be done by a full play through. If not, Huber should just cancel the betting game with Bossman.
We should all tweet kyle and tell him the stakes. Id be pretty sad if we didnt get any more classic bets this early in EZA because he made huber quit
But it was directly related to the topic! Since Britian destroyed itself Rare won't have the money to make good video games. That political mess might actually spoil your games.I think they do a great job of keeping it out of the streams and shows. Kyle will redirect immediately and Ian is the only one whose views are strong and have seeped into he programming. I don't need this political mess to spoil my games podcast.
Kyle and Huber have great wwe chemistryScrew it if he can't honor a bet just get Ben or someone else to do it with Huber
Kyle and Huber have great wwe chemistry
I like a bitter rivalry where the bets have people doing the thing they dont want to do.
All they need to do is state that they need to play the game in good sport and honor the bets the way they are intended like kyle did when he had to play Outlast.
That was way funnier than actually seeing him play though ALttP though, which is a boring game. He also hasn't broken the terms of the contract yet. Why do you want him to suffer when he clearly stated that he could only handle that five minutes?I agree I would prefer it to stay Kyle and Huber but not if it's always just waiting for some stupid loophole to get out of doing it. That shouldn't be what this is about
That was way funnier than actually seeing him play though ALttP though, which is a boring game. He also hasn't broken the terms of the contract yet.
I think he was very clear about his thoughts on the game. He's not going to suddenly start liking it.Well just have to agree to disagree. Watching some lame 5 minute stream is not what I had in mind. I wanted to actually hear Kyle's thoughts through the the game
I think he was very clear about his thoughts on the game. He's not going to suddenly start liking it.
"This is my father or uncle. We presumably sleep in the same bed."
That's way better dude, he delivered the complaints very succinctly. That line about the bed tells you everything Kyle thinks about the care put into the opening scenario of this game and the way environments are designed. What makes it a legit stream anyway, what are you going on about? He's still going to do a complete play through of the game. I think you're just upset that he doesn't like A Link to the Past.Any member of GAF could have delivered that quality of a stream or better. I just expect more. Try and deliver and elevate your craft. Not just the bare minimum.
The guy could have delivered a legit stream and explained his complaints in real time through the game and instead we get something like this.
Strive for better
lmao, give me a break.Any member of GAF could have delivered that quality of a stream or better. I just expect more. Try and deliver and elevate your craft. Not just the bare minimum.
The guy could have delivered a legit stream and explained his complaints in real time through the game and instead we get something like this.
Strive for better
That's way better dude, he delivered the complaints very succinctly. That line about the bed tells you everything Kyle thinks about the care put into the opening scenario of this game and the way environments are designed. What makes it a legit stream anyway, what are you going on about? He's still going to do a complete play through of the game. I think you're just upset that he doesn't like A Link to the Past.
lmao, give me a break.
I really don't get it either. It's like he doesn't know there are two streams left.lmao, give me a break.
I really don't get it either. It's like he doesn't know there are two streams left.
Nah, I just don't have my head up my ass about a single stream.And responses like this are we have like 1 Jason Schreier in this entire industry
Yeah, that's fine. I just don't understand how you can think that's weak content. It's weird dude. I came to this thread just to post about how good I thought it was when I watched it.I do know and have said multiple times I hope the next 2 streams deliver.
This thread has a serious problem with criticism being placed at the Allies and at times its due. An echo chamber of only praise helps no one.
At the end of the day I live this crew. But if I think some of the content is weak I'm not afraid to voice it
Nah, I just don't have my head up my ass about a single stream.
If he just shits around for two more streams, go ahead and complain.
If you're just going to whine about a single stream, I'll continue to laugh at you.
I've read your posts. I even agree about the overly positive push that some people have and deflection of criticism.Again. Read the posts.
I'm knocking this one stream. Not the entire work. I've said on multiple occasions I hope the next 2 deliver and will totally support if they do. I'm not going to come in this thread and claim ever single piece of content is dope. That doesn't help the Allies and it doesn't help discussion
It hurts the quality pal. The level of quality was way down. It wasn't the in depth analysis of A Link to the Past I've come to expect from EZA streams.I've read your posts. I even agree about the overly positive push that some people have and deflection of criticism.
I just really don't see what one joke stream hurts. It's Kyle's shtick anyways.
I've read the posts.
I really don't see what one joke stream hurts. It's Kyle's shtick anyways.
Entirely agree. Kyle's shtick like this doesn't get my appeal. I mean it's one stream so need for us to scream at the sky, but I agree I come to expect more from the Allies content.Any member of GAF could have delivered that quality of a stream or better. I just expect more. Try and deliver and elevate your craft. Not just the bare minimum.
The guy could have delivered a legit stream and explained his complaints in real time through the game and instead we get something like this.
Strive for better
Any member of GAF could have delivered that quality of a stream or better. I just expect more. Try and deliver and elevate your craft. Not just the bare minimum.
The guy could have delivered a legit stream and explained his complaints in real time through the game and instead we get something like this.
Strive for better