MassiveNights
Banned
Morning flights are leaving Paris which means the French aren't squirrelly about terrorism quite yet.
The plane took off from Paris.
Yeah, the only mechanical failure I can think of that would result in the loss of an entire plane that quickly is the engine turbines falling apart, sending shrapnel though the fuselage. Though, I can't remember an incident like that since the 90's and that United DC-10 incident in Iowa. And even then the plane was somewhat flyable. The Pilots nearly landed the thing safely, and over half the passengers survived (which is kind of amazing if you see the crash video).
And like you said, planes are tough. Even explosive decompression is unlikely to bring down an airliner.
Given the sudden disappearance this sounds like a bomb. We've never really got a great explanation for the Sinai attack as to what and how that bomb got on the plane.
Also Egypt is notorious for incompetence in handling air crashes
Modern airplane engines are amazingly well built. They go through blade-off testing where an engine turbine blade is released at maximum power using an explosive charge. If the engine housing does not contain all shrapnel, it does not pass certification.
Realistically, the chances of shrapnel from the engine is pretty damn low I would think. Here's an interesting video from an A380 engine that demonstrates how really overbuilt engines are to prevent something like what you're suggesting...
https://youtu.be/j973645y5AA
Given the sudden disappearance this sounds like a bomb. We've never really got a great explanation for the Sinai attack as to what and how that bomb got on the plane.
Also Egypt is notorious for incompetence in handling air crashes
The plane took off from France.
Reuters cites a French airport official saying of flight MS804:
It did not land, that is all we can say for the moment.
Associated Press reports that Ihab Raslan, a spokesman for the Egyptian civil aviation agency, told SkyNews Arabia that the Airbus A320 most likely crashed into the sea.
However, he also said the plane was about to enter Egyptian airspace when it disappeared from radar, contradicting the airline, which said it was 10 miles (16km) inside Egyptian airspace when contact was lost.
It is not uncommon for conflicting information to surface at this stage the number of those on board has already been adjusted from 69 to 66.
Modern airplane engines are amazingly well built. They go through blade-off testing where an engine turbine blade is released at maximum power using an explosive charge. If the engine housing does not contain all shrapnel, it does not pass certification.
Realistically, the chances of shrapnel from the engine is pretty damn low I would think. Here's an interesting video from an A380 engine that demonstrates how really overbuilt engines are to prevent something like what you're suggesting...
https://youtu.be/j973645y5AA
Taking off and landing are when the most accidents happen for planes.
Though this doesn't look like a normal accident.
It could be, but it's rather premature. Terrorism is one of the lesser causes for flight accidents.I'm genuinely surprised by the number of people in this thread claiming that "these things happen" and/or vehemently arguing that mechanical failure must be the cause whenever someone even suggests the possibility of terrorism.
BNO News @BNONews
BREAKING: Emergency equipment on EgyptAir flight transmitted distress signal at 4:26 a.m. Cairo time, airline confirms
Welp
The Associated Press @AP
BREAKING: Egyptian aviation officials say an EgyptAir flight from Paris to Cairo with 66 passengers and crew on board has crashed.
What does that news mean?
Welp
What does that news mean?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2016/may/19/egyptair-plane-cairo-paris-live-updatesEmergency beacon 'detected at 4.26am'
EgyptAir says that the planes emergency devices (possibly an emergency locator transmitter or beacon) sent a distress signal that was received at 4.26am, some two hours after the previously stated last radar contact.
Welp
Welp
That doesn't seem to make sense, that would of come over an hour after the plane was supposed to of land.
These beacons can sometimes activate only after a crash.
Assuming the beacon signal wasn't coming from the last known location, this is possibly even worse news than straight out crashing / explosion.
What this would mean is that someone in the plane shut of the transponders the minute they crossed over to Egypt, probably trusting that Egyptian military is in a state of chaos and won't be able to figure out what's going on and intercept.
Then the plane would be diverted to a terrorist held area, with the passengers paraded in front of cameras, or worse.
probably trusting that Egyptian military is in a state of chaos and won't be able to figure out what's going on and intercept.
Assuming the beacon signal wasn't coming from the last known location, this is possibly even worse news than straight out crashing / explosion.
What this would mean is that someone in the plane shut of the transponders the minute they crossed over to Egypt, probably trusting that Egyptian military is in a state of chaos and won't be able to figure out what's going on and intercept.
Then the plane would be diverted to a terrorist held area, with the passengers paraded in front of cameras, or worse.
I mean, I won't rule out terrorist activity either, but this is a little too much of a stretchAssuming the beacon signal wasn't coming from the last known location, this is possibly even worse news than straight out crashing / explosion.
What this would mean is that someone in the plane shut of the transponders the minute they crossed over to Egypt, probably trusting that Egyptian military is in a state of chaos and won't be able to figure out what's going on and intercept.
Then the plane would be diverted to a terrorist held area, with the passengers paraded in front of cameras, or worse.
What?
Shipper 275km south of Karpathos allegedly saw a fire in the sky.
Airplanes don't just explode in a ball of flames. Seems ISIS clear as day to me.
Shipper 275km south of Karpathos allegedly saw a fire in the sky.
Airplanes don't just explode in a ball of flames. Seems ISIS clear as day to me.
According to BBC there was a distress call.
Shipper 275km south of Karpathos allegedly saw a fire in the sky.
Airplanes don't just explode in a ball of flames. Seems ISIS clear as day to me.
Shipper 275km south of Karpathos allegedly saw a fire in the sky.
Airplanes don't just explode in a ball of flames. Seems ISIS clear as day to me.
CNN saying catastrophic explosion
O
My apologies, I deleted it. (Though it didn't say 5:21 PM)That's not even the same flight in the screenshot you posted. The times are wrong and the data just flat stops at 05:21:51 PM local time.
My apologies, I deleted it. (Though it didn't say 5:21 PM)
Assuming the beacon signal wasn't coming from the last known location, this is possibly even worse news than straight out crashing / explosion.
What this would mean is that someone in the plane shut of the transponders the minute they crossed over to Egypt, probably trusting that Egyptian military is in a state of chaos and won't be able to figure out what's going on and intercept.
Then the plane would be diverted to a terrorist held area, with the passengers paraded in front of cameras, or worse.
BLU BLU SKC TEMPO SCT030Man, clear as day my ass.
My apologies, I deleted it. (Though it didn't say 5:21 PM)