Like they could tell the difference. Haha.numble said:But those videos aren't 1080p.
Like they could tell the difference. Haha.numble said:But those videos aren't 1080p.
loosus said:And because you're essentially trapped. Yeah, you can get around Apple, but it's become almost as much like the iPad short of being one.
numble said:But those videos aren't 1080p.
You can make them private as well.LyleLanley said:Can't you upload 1080p on youtube? I remember watching those 4k videos on youtube a while back.
Flying_Phoenix said:I just find this theory ridiculous, especially due to the fact that most PC owners use Digital Distribution or DVDs anyway. Hardly any Blu-ray games exist today and I'm suppose to believe that they will dominate the PC world in the next 2 years?
teh_pwn said:What are you talking about? A ton of PC games are ports from consoles that use DVDs. They happen to fit on steam today, but when consoles bump disc capacity they won't. Probably games will be printed on 2-3 DVDs at first and then go to blu-ray just like they did with CDs to DVD.
Edit:
Fuck it. This argument is stale and dumb. Keep thinking current trends will always continue.
dallow_bg said:No, the thumb drives belong to everyone. They just get passed around.
I don't give a shit about losing one more than I do a disc.
LyleLanley said:Are you really arguing that digital distribution will die and everyone will go back to using more physical hardware for games?
Flying_Phoenix said:>$30? Try <$10.
Seriously. Even in Australia, land of paying more for everything electronic, you can get an 8Gb USB stick for next to nothing.Flying_Phoenix said:>$30? Try <$10.
No, I've never said that. I will argue that they're not used for HTPCs as much as you think. And I will argue that they've been a profitable business for Apple, and their niche in the Apple ecosystem won't go away. Not everyone needs an expensive iMac, and the Apple TV is the HTPC-like solution they want to steer people towards. Heck, they've even removed Front Row and the Remote.Raistlin said:Wow ... so you're actually serious?
You actually think the Mini outsells iMac's?
The ultimate goal isn;t to make you use only Apple software, but to make you buy software only from Apple's storequadriplegicjon said:Apart from OSX, iTunes and iCal, every other single piece of software I use is not from Apple.
LyleLanley said:Are you really arguing that digital distribution will die and everyone will go back to using more physical hardware for games?
My family sends me things too. Via thumb drive so not a one way street for me.Marty Chinn said:That seriously sounds like a hassle that I need to have enough around in distribution and to make sure that I have one on hand when I want to bring over some pictures or video to give to them or to make sure I get one back when they're done using it. USB drives cost a lot more than a DVD-R and even if I had like 10, that's a lot of upfront cost to have even if I didn't care if one or two went missing. So much more hassle than just burning a disc and handing it to them and not caring about where the USB drives are especially when stuff going to the parents tend to be a one way exchange rather than the bringing over photos back.
Marty Chinn said:No, I think he's arguing that people don't want to wait 10, 15, or even 20 hours for a game to download when they can go to a store, buy it, and play it right away. Until bandwidth at a fast rate is widely available without caps, there's going to be room for physical distribution.
Marty Chinn said:No, I think he's arguing that people don't want to wait 10, 15, or even 20 hours for a game to download when they can go to a store, buy it, and play it right away. Until bandwidth at a fast rate is widely available without caps, there's going to be room for physical distribution.
LyleLanley said:These kind of things are easily avoidable though, just let people preload the game a week in advance. As for bandwith caps, nothing I can do about that.
My computer still has a floppy drive.DBebm5 said:I still miss floppy drives.
Reread your post. That actually is what you stated.numble said:No, I've never said that.
I will say one thing regarding HTPC's, I find this amusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_Mini#Home_theaterI will argue that they're not used for HTPCs as much as you think.
Is there a point where I stated they necessarily haven't been profitable?And I will argue that they've been a profitable business for Apple, and their niche in the Apple ecosystem won't go away.
I agree not everyone needs an iMac, but your latter point actually furthers my argument. What you seem to not see is that even if we discount external competitors, long-term, Apple's own CE-type devices (iTV, iPad) will continue to get more powerful and feature-rich. Which may make the Mini redundant or unattractive for enough people that it may not make sense to continue.Not everyone needs an expensive iMac, and the Apple TV is the HTPC-like solution they want to steer people towards. Heck, they've even removed Front Row and the Remote.
AdrianWerner said:The ultimate goal isn;t to make you use only Apple software, but to make you buy software only from Apple's store
TheSeks said:Forgetting the drive capacity. It's roughly 25 for 16 in retail places. You could get a bunch more CD/DVD's for that price and be nearly in the same ball park with flash drives give or take a few dollars and gigs.
Again: I don't think Optical drives are obsolete just yet. It may be coming, but I don't think it's time to pull the drives out just yet.
LyleLanley said:Are you really arguing that digital distribution will die and everyone will go back to using more physical hardware for games?
Wikipedia? Come on.Raistlin said:Reread your post. That actually is what you stated.
I will say one thing regarding HTPC's, I find this amusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_Mini#Home_theater
Mac Mini Wiki entry. In the Overview section there are only two subsections, Design and Home Theater. First sentence for the section, "The Mac Mini is widely used for home theater applications".
I think most here would find that as being a stronger anecdote than citing Amazon sales (contentious to begin with) during the release week of an Apple refresh as some sort of indicator of overall sales distribution versus iMac.
Is there a point where I stated they necessarily haven't been profitable?
As for their niche ... I thought you said it wasn't a niche? Regardless, what I'm contending is that it may go away, not that I think it's definite or even dropping markedly right now
I agree not everyone needs an iMac, but your latter point actually furthers my argument. What you seem to not see is that even if we discount external competitors, long-term, Apple's own CE-type devices (iTV, iPad) will continue to get more powerful and feature-rich. Which may make the Mini redundant or unattractive for enough people that it may not make sense to continue.
Yeah, at work all software is on the network and installed from there.Vyer said:Apple may be the first to actually physically remove the drive, but this has been building for a long time.
We rarely buy upgrade DVDs for clients anymore at work - instead we use the handy Microsoft Anytime Upgrade keys and software built into just about every new Windows 7 machine.
And most of our clients don't bother with Office dvds any more either, preferring to just purchase it with that nice preoladed Office package Microsoft is putting on each new system as well. Or just downloading it from the site.
5 years ago I would have had a bigger problem with this, if only in pointing to a lot of the everyday applications (on the Windows side anyway) that this would cause conflicts with - such as Office. But it's pretty obvious that everyone wants to move away from this, and Microsoft is just as eager to be part of the group leading the way.
Still, there's enough usage that removing the drives altogether still would cause some significant issues....but it won't be long now.
Flying_Phoenix said:Also wouldn't developers just work on better compression techniques? I mean in the 7Zip and WinZip type of way.
I actually find the discussion interesting because many people who have probably posted in the thread own netbooks...a product that universally lacks optical drives. You get used to not having them...then you begin to appreciate the lack thereof. Wasted space inside your computer and unnecessary weight.Vyer said:Apple may be the first to actually physically remove the drive, but this has been building for a long time.
Dreams-Visions said:I actually find the discussion interesting because many people who have probably posted in the thread own netbooks...a product that universally lacks optical drives. You get used to not having them...then you begin to appreciate the lack thereof. Wasted space inside your computer and unnecessary weight.
Apple may be the first to unilaterally remove optical drives from their full line...but we're really only talking about 4 or 5 models of computers. They will remain on their Mac Pro's undoubtedly. I bet most PC manufacturers have at least 5 models that they sell without optical drives. I don't see the big deal.
Marty Chinn said:You think things aren't compressed already? You can only compress so far. Compression is a technique always used in game development.
Wait ... you're arguing 1st week Amazon sales as being a better source?numble said:Wikipedia? Come on.
How do you know they aren't? Oh ... so we do have usage data now?The current high sales of a disc-free Mac mini are not being used for HTPCs, as you point out, so what are they being used for?
Sure, they are two separate things. However stating it's niche in an ecosystem does agree with my point regarding Mac OS distribution - you know, one of the things I've been arguing?I think you don't understand context. Niche in an ecosystem is different from "being niche."
Raistlin said:Wait ... you're arguing 1st week Amazon sales as being a better source?
Okay ... but that is certainly not without its numerous problems.LyleLanley said:I don't want to get involved in this argument, but you do realize that there is an older version of the Mac Mini in the number 2 spot on that Amazon sales list that has been in the top 100 spots for 407 days right?
In 98, 1.4MB was a pitiful amount of memory. And we had a hot method of distributing way larger amount of info faster and cheaper. Today, 7GB is not a pitiful amount of memory. Let alone the 50GB of a Blueray. And flash drives are considerably more expensive. I can burn a DVD and send files to a co-worker for a few cents. It would take hours to upload those and would eat really fast into my server bandwidth cap. A 1.4MB could barely hold a single .Doc document in 1998.Flying_Phoenix said:In 1998, not having a floppy disc was considered shocking. Yet a few years later people agreed that it was a good decision. All Apple is doing is speeding up the process for a final nail in the coffin.
Steam is on its last legs. Gabe better pack things up.
Also wouldn't developers just work on better compression techniques? I mean in the 7Zip and WinZip type of way.
gotcha.Marty Chinn said:I think it's the notion that optical drives have no use anymore that is causing a stir. I think optical drives are used less frequently than before and there's not a need for every computer to have one, but I also think they still have significant uses for them that you can't get rid of them completely at this point in time. Just like we don't need an optical drive on our phones or tablets, you don't need one in every computing device.
Flying_Phoenix said:I never said that, I said for Valve to focus their research further on compression, (something that gets better overtime). Hell they just bumped up their supplied download speeds.
That's what they just did. They now have one case design used for the server and regular Minis. The only difference is specs.Raistlin said:Wait ... you're arguing 1st week Amazon sales as being a better source?
Come on. Are you actually just trolling at this point? Seems so.
The issue here is I can bring in tons of anecdotes, and you'll find some rationale for why it's crap without offering anything to counter. Even though most here would find them reasonable by themselves, let alone in aggregate ... you'll then site Amazon for the sales argument (at a launch no less) when basically everyone here agrees is a crap measure?
How do you know they aren't? Oh ... so we do have usage data now?
Sure, they are two separate things. However stating it's niche in an ecosystem does agree with my point regarding Mac OS distribution - you know, one of the things I've been arguing?
Let me make it simple. My theory is that as a standalone desktop line ... there's a good chance it will have problems in the future.
I would contend there may come a time when it doesn't make sense to continue. However one thing in it's favor is the existence of the Mac Mini Server line. Assuming that's going okay, they may keep up the desktop variant since the form-factor is so similar.
So in the future I'd expect they'll either drop the desktop variant and just offer a server variant with the desktop OS as an option (and maybe bring in a lower-end model) ... or make them so similar that fabrication makes it a non-issue - both can exist.
What just happens looks to be an indication that they are making them so similar fabrication makes it moot ... or it's the first step into simply merging them entirely. Maybe that's the same thing - or maybe they'll reduce the SKU offerings even more. So basically as long as the servers sell, we'll probably see the desktop.
Could it be vise versa right now? Maybe, but if it is now I don't see it continuing.
Are they basically the same MoBo and internal design as well?Tobor said:That's what they just did. They now have one case design used for the server and regular Minis. The only difference is specs.
It's the other way around--they dumped the Xserve line and just installed OS X server on Mac Minis to create the Mac Mini server line.Raistlin said:Are they basically the same MoBo and internal design as well?
Interesting. Seems like they're already doing what I was expecting.
Which makes perfect sense for a laptop/netbook and zero sense for a desktop, which mac mimi isDreams-Visions said:.then you begin to appreciate the lack thereof. Wasted space inside your computer and unnecessary weight.
.
I don't think that really says anything beyond they're going with what makes the most sense production wise.numble said:It's the other way around--they dumped the Xserve line and just installed OS X server on Mac Minis to create the Mac Mini server line.
AdrianWerner said:Which makes perfect sense for a laptop/netbook and zero sense for a desktop, which mac mimi is
Raistlin said:I don't think that really says anything beyond they're going with what makes the most sense production wise.
Regardless my point still stands. I personally expect the desktop sales of the Mini will go down in the coming years. That's all I really have been saying.
Dreams-Visions said:You guys are so dramatic.
I took the optical drive out of my MBP on DAY 1 and replaced it with a HDD.
You know how may times I have need of an optical drive? about once a season. so I knock the dust off of my $30 external dvd drive and that's that. optical drives aren't obsolete...but they are in my life. I don't need DVDs; I stream my videos over my network or watch blu-ray (on rare ocassion). I don't need to burn CDs. My cars have iPod inputs built in.
I think the past growth and $100 pricedrop says otherwise, but of course it can never be proved--they go down in the same category in the financials, and it is just a software swap that turns a Mac Mini into server and vice versa, so even in your worse case scenario, the desktop variant will not disappear from the market.Raistlin said:I don't think that really says anything beyond they're going with what makes the most sense production wise.
Regardless my point still stands. I personally expect the desktop sales of the Mini will go down in the coming years. That's all I really have been saying.