Support NeoGAF

[MrA]

we should keep in mind that in the end Carlton was the winner

 

[kevboard]

This update proves that their 'abusing' of dlss was the right way to go.

no it wasn't. the way to go would have been to make sure image quality isn't completely awful instead of pushing graphics detail and effects to a point where the game looks worse than its predecessor.

I wonder what the people who were claiming it would be better without dlss are saying now.

it does look better. at least without DLSS there's no constant artifacting. image quality is awful regardless of which mode you choose.

 

[LordOcidax]

No it's a fun game that looks nice. The game is super fast and uses motion blur which is what the image above is showing with a 400 x zoom in.

Just haters hating here again.

Game is light on content though.

This is not an issue for BMW that look horrible in movement and others games that uses FSR… but you know, is a Switch 2 game and exclusive on top.

 

[Same ol G]

no it wasn't. the way to go would have been to make sure image quality isn't completely awful instead of pushing graphics detail and effects to a point where the game looks worse than its predecessor.

I played them all, i don't find the previous game looking better so that's subjective

it does look better. at least without DLSS there's no constant artifacting. image quality is awful regardless of which mode you choose.

I really don't notice the artifacting while racing, what i do notice is the jaggy mess in the distance when using pure mode.

All in all it doesn't really matter because it's an extra option, i will use the dlss option with 60 frames cause that one looks better to me in motion.

 

[RAIDEN1]

The closest a Nintendo console will get to a modern day F-Zero

 

[Same ol G]

The closest a Nintendo console will get to a modern day F-Zero

At least we got GX in the GC emulator, the nice thing about that game is that it uses the complete screen when activating wide screen mode so no black borders