3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Intent of...what exactly?
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Are the media backing away from it?
Dumb question I'm having trouble finding an answer for: were Clinton's emails ever hacked? I have people telling me that happened, but I don't recall this at all. Am I crazy?
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
People have been hearing "FBI Clinton emails" for months now. Trump and Fox News have tried (and failed) to make it stick in any meaningful way, and it hasnt. All it does is reinforce the narrative for the tin foil hat idiots who think she's crooked and weren't going to vote for her anyway. We are a week and a half out from Election Day. We are long past the point of "perception" and "optics" mattering. Anything that doesn't make it more likely that Trump wins is meaningless at this point, and this new "scandal" absolutely does nothing to make a Trump win more likely, therefore it might as well be nothing.
Dumb question I'm having trouble finding an answer for: were Clinton's emails ever hacked? I have people telling me that happened, but I don't recall this at all. Am I crazy?
Are the media backing away from it?
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Valid pointI'm not so sure he had a choice. He didn't want to appear as though he held back information. He knows Republicans well, it would be over the coals for him. He could have waited a few days and things could have even been worse. He went ahead now.
I think the issue is how he handled this. Vague statement that let imaginations go wild. He should have seen how this would play out and been more forthcoming.
So glad this turned out to be nothing. Fuck Comey for providing a vague statement eager Republicans could run with.
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Was away from the computer.
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Intent of...what exactly?
When does the truth actually matter?
Barring another major story, this is what the talking heads will discuss all weekend, across all major networks.
Again, not likely it sways anything to his favor. But it's bad coverage at a time she was just looking to ride the calendar out.
Nope.
You responded to my initial statement that said she admitted she made a mistake, but that multiple inquiries and investigations concluded she did nothing illegal. You then posted a politfact link for... no reason whatsoever? Because the link only confirms what I already told you.
Signs point to GAF freak out. Nothing substantial. News media slow to course-correct.
From what I understand, the content of her emails was never the problem. Rather, it was her lax email security that has caused so much consternation.
Somewhere in between, likely.
Don't really know how many emails we're talking about here... Apparently, anywhere from 3 to thousands.
Then there's the question of the content of these emails. If it will indeed take longer than 2 weeks to go through, as the FBI has suggested, I would assume there are quite a few.
GAF freak out at the beginning, compounded when the story became clearer to a mega GAF freak out
In terms of actual news, there isn't shit so far. Comey was required to inform congress that his testimony had to be amended due to a device recovered during a different investigation into Weinerboy. Likely because of connection to Huma, it became a relevant device to the Clinton inquiry.
The only possible thing I could ever see coming out of this is correspondence between Huma and Weiner or someone else possibly conflicting with Huma's given testimony during the Clinton inquiry. But I think more would have moved after Comey's statement to congress had anything actually been discovered here.
This thread being so many pages long is dogs barking at thunder.
A source told a Fox reporter that the FBI has been looking at 4 Weiner devices and they've found no classified information so far in the related emails on those devices.
So glad this turned out to be nothing. Fuck Comey for providing a vague statement eager Republicans could run with.
@jimsciutto
Breaking: Emails involved were sent & received by aide Huma Abedin, over a long period of time, 1000s of emails -law enforcement officials
He should get canned.
What will those discussions consists of, exactly, considering what we all know right now?
All that matters is perception and on that front it means a lot. The facts of this this whole ordeal may well be much less egregious than the hyperbole we had this morning but it won't matter.
All that matters is perception and on that front it means a lot. The facts of this this whole ordeal may well be much less egregious than the hyperbole we had this morning but it won't matter.
Agreed. He's either incompetent or politically motivated. Either way, I hope Hillary fires his ass.
What happened to 3 emails? This fucking story....
What will those discussions consists of, exactly, considering what we all know right now?
Are you calling all American voters cowards?
Yes, this. Trump will just keep reminding people she's currently being investigated by the FBI.You are preaching to the converted. People on GAF seem generally clued up on the ins and outs of this story.
Most people will be hearing "FBI Clinton E-mails".
I don't have much faith in people, I dunno, Trump already has more than a third of the vote in his palm after all. I'm not saying it's a certainty but I think it's possible.
3 emails is plenty to prove intent.
Its infighting at the agency over what they want the narrative to be. Media doing their bidding.What happened to 3 emails? This fucking story....
If you're still trying to use "no one actually spoke of their policy" at this point in the race then you have no in anyway shape or form been paying attention to what's been said, out of every single candidate in this race, Hillary has more than enough times outlined her policies succinctly."If you're not with us you're against us. Its YOUR fault for the nuclear holocaust"
I'm not a trump supporter but I love being vilified for refusing to participate in this circus. This whole election comes off as a reality TV show with debates being televised shouting matches and no policies being spoken of. I want no part of any this.
Firing the person who investigating you is an extremely bad idea. It's not going to happen. One of the unspoken rules of our democracy is that the ruling party doesn't fire or arrest the opposition.
Intent of?
"If you're not with us you're against us. Its YOUR fault for the nuclear holocaust"
I'm not a trump supporter but I love being vilified for refusing to participate in this circus. This whole election comes off as a reality TV show with debates being televised shouting matches and no policies being spoken of. I want no part of any this.
You are preaching to the converted. People on GAF seem generally clued up on the ins and outs of this story.
Most people will be hearing "FBI Clinton E-mails".
I don't have much faith in people, I dunno, Trump already has more than a third of the vote in his palm after all. I'm not saying it's a certainty but I think it's possible.
To clarify this: being probed can be something as simple as a ping request (basically, it's like calling a landline to see if someone's home.)I believe the FBI said that were was evidence of the server being probed/sniffed but no evidence that it was hacked.
I don't think you truly realize and appreciate how far behind Trump really is right now. Mybe this will calm you a tad? Or maybe this? Others will point to this to unease your stomach again, but there's also this and this. You get the idea.
Keep in mind that early voting has already begun so millions of votes have already been cast. So, barring there's not a massive, unprecedented polling error in this election and there's not a magic Silent Majority out there for Trump to offset his numbers to an unprecedented degree, this news will have to tank Hillary worse than Trump himself has tanked twice in this election. Do you really think this story is going to be the one to do, despite the fact that the big e-mail story in July didn't tank her that bad, and that was before most of America pegged Trump as a sexual predator and saw him get his ass handed to him at three debates. I mean, seriously, look past the panic and just...think about it.
Wolf took it to Rudy again. That was pretty good.CNN was in panic mode 30 minutes ago.
It's customary for an incoming president to change the heads of the different agencies. Not picking Comey again is perfectly reasonable under normal circumstances; and it's certain now. It's not as if Comey was some sort of independent special prosecutor - he works directly for the President.Firing the person who investigating you is an extremely bad idea. It's not going to happen. One of the unspoken rules of our democracy is that the ruling party doesn't fire or arrest the opposition.
Aren't the FBI directors appointed to 10 year terms to keep them politically independent?It's customary for an incoming president to change the heads of the different agencies. Not picking Comey again is perfectly reasonable under normal circumstances; and it's certain now. It's not as if Comey was some sort of independent special prosecutor - he works directly for the President.
Aren't the FBI directors appointed to 10 year terms to keep them politically independent?
Kill me now. When will this watched election be over?????