FBI reviewing emails found on devices used by Weiner/Abedin

Status
Not open for further replies.
You do realize Clinton, Obama, etc.. all released their returns right

They didn't

Guys like Buffet and Gates, too
Hey don't get me wrong! The US as the worst choice ever I just don't think the tax thing is a very good argument, the tax thing got chucked about loads early on and nothing stuck.I would be a never Clinton person tho! If I was able to vote, way to much smoke n all that.
 
It is remarkable how intellectually devious and vapid this view is. Trump is indisputably the single most corrupt candidate ever to be nominated by a major party for president in the past hundred years. I mean it's not even in the same galaxy. Even the most GENEROUS interpretation where I pretend for the sake of humouring your ridiculous viewpoint that every single scandal reported by major papers about Hillary is correct.

Let's say she intentionally destroyed e-mails, knew material was classified but mishandled it anyway, was dealing in pay to play for her Foundation and asked Donna Brazile for her questions in person... none of it, and I mean none of it, could compare to the sheer insanity and cloud of corruption facing Trump.

Here is a man who literally - with photo evidence - uses his charity as a front for his own personal gain, buying portraits of himself and fixing fountains and paying for his son's eagle scout membership fee. Paying off legal fees using charity money. A man who crashes charity events when not invited, donates nothing but still wants the photo op. Who has lied about virtually all his giving ever. Who pretended to give money to 9/11 charities and pretending to give money to Veteran's Charities, until reporters started looking into it. Then magically a donation!

Who bends the law beyond all recognition in his pursuit of using other people's money to avoid paying taxes. Who we actually do have hard evidence of destroying emails and evidence in direct violation of a court order.

Who refuses to sell or recuse himself from any of his 500 businesses despite the unprecedented conflict of interest were he to become president. A man whose disgustingly predatory and fraudulent University was meant to target the elderly and uninformed and disenfranchised to steal their money. Who has been accused of so much sexual assault no reasonable individual could argue he is innocent of them all.

Who faced one of the largest housing discrimination suits in the country at the time, with accounts such as this:



There was no argument he was guilty or not. He was. You can argue otherwise. You'll embarrass yourself the millionth time and reveal yourself as a racist as well if you try. Good luck refuting that.

There is no reference point for the level of corruption Donald Trump is mired in. We don't even need to touch his rampantly racist, misogynistic, bigoted and xenophobic views, though you're probably terrible for ignoring those as well. If your problem is actually corruption and you're not lying, you are the single most grotesquely intellectually dishonest individual ever to grace this forum for making him your second choice. And yes, shame is something you should feel for not looking inside yourself and figuring out how you can be so goddamned disappointing.
Thanks for this post.
 
Hey don't get me wrong! The US as the worst choice ever I just don't think the tax thing is a very good argument, the tax thing got chucked about loads early on and nothing stuck.I would be a never Clinton person tho! If I was able to vote, way to much smoke n all that.

She paid 30%, he paid zero. She voted to close loophole, he used it to pay 0%.
 
It is remarkable how intellectually devious and vapid this view is. Trump is indisputably the single most corrupt candidate ever to be nominated by a major party for president in the past hundred years. I mean it's not even in the same galaxy. Even the most GENEROUS interpretation where I pretend for the sake of humouring your ridiculous viewpoint that every single scandal reported by major papers about Hillary is correct.

Let's say she intentionally destroyed e-mails, knew material was classified but mishandled it anyway, was dealing in pay to play for her Foundation and asked Donna Brazile for her questions in person... none of it, and I mean none of it, could compare to the sheer insanity and cloud of corruption facing Trump.

Here is a man who literally - with photo evidence - uses his charity as a front for his own personal gain, buying portraits of himself and fixing fountains and paying for his son's eagle scout membership fee. Paying off legal fees using charity money. A man who crashes charity events when not invited, donates nothing but still wants the photo op. Who has lied about virtually all his giving ever. Who pretended to give money to 9/11 charities and pretending to give money to Veteran's Charities, until reporters started looking into it. Then magically a donation!

Who bends the law beyond all recognition in his pursuit of using other people's money to avoid paying taxes. Who we actually do have hard evidence of destroying emails and evidence in direct violation of a court order.

Who refuses to sell or recuse himself from any of his 500 businesses despite the unprecedented conflict of interest were he to become president. A man whose disgustingly predatory and fraudulent University was meant to target the elderly and uninformed and disenfranchised to steal their money. Who has been accused of so much sexual assault no reasonable individual could argue he is innocent of them all.

Who faced one of the largest housing discrimination suits in the country at the time, with accounts such as this:



There was no argument he was guilty or not. He was. You can argue otherwise. You'll embarrass yourself the millionth time and reveal yourself as a racist as well if you try. Good luck refuting that.

There is no reference point for the level of corruption Donald Trump is mired in. We don't even need to touch his rampantly racist, misogynistic, bigoted and xenophobic views, though you're probably terrible for ignoring those as well. If your problem is actually corruption and you're not lying, you are the single most grotesquely intellectually dishonest individual ever to grace this forum for making him your second choice. And yes, shame is something you should feel for not looking inside yourself and figuring out how you can be so goddamned disappointing.

Goddamn son! I may have to use much of what you've written here to blast some nut jobs on my Facebook feed. So much ether...so much truth. Well done sir!
 
Which candidate is currently under FBI Investigation?

/thread,
Both?
It has now been revealed that the FBi is indeed investigating the Manafort link to Ukraine and Russia, but also the potential Trump campaign link after the memo from Roger Stone and the server traffic from the Trump campaign to Russia.

But

Who has been accused of 3 rapes himself?
Who has been on tape boasting about using their status to assault women?
Who has attacked a gold star family because of their religion?
Who has attacked a former miss universe because of her weight, and then asking on twitter for people to go watch a sex tape that doesn't exist?
Who called Mexican illegals murderers and rapists?
Who said they admire foreign dictators, specially Putin?
Who asked for a travel ban based on religion?
Who used illegal foreign labor, amd foreign syeel?
Who used racist practices in their housing ventures?
Who is planning to have a "deportation force", rounding up people nazi style?
Who has demonstrable links to the alt right and white supremacists?
Who said they'd see no reason not to use nukes?
Who said global warming was invented by China?
Who pursued the racist birth issue of Obama's birth p!ace 2 years after the long form was released?
Who was involved personally in hundreds of lawsuits, 50 ongoing, including some major scam like Trump U?
Who has demonstrably set up their foundation fraudulently (in NY) and used it for personal gain?
Who said they'd leave Nato high and dry unless tney'd pay up?
Who boasted about not paying federal taxes and running contractors into bankrupcy?
Who managed to drive several Casinos to bankrupcy, and now pretending it was smart?
Who is suspected of having paid officials in FL to avoid a lawsuit, through a foundation?
Who has refused to release their taxes in spite of 40 years of tradition?
Who has shown time and again they have the temperment of a 10yr old when taunted or slighted?
Who has demonstrably lied through their campaign more than any elected official ever, with a record near 70% false across the board, from mostly false to pants on fire?
Who has obvious ties to Russia, including but not limited to major asset funding, as disclosed by Trump's son?
Who has ?iterally called for violence during rallies, including insinuation of assassination?

I could go on, but /thread indeed
 
Goddamn son! I may have to use much of what you've written here to blast some nut jobs on my Facebook feed. So much ether...so much truth. Well done sir!

Believe it or not I was gonna post about thirty more links I had handy, but I thought it'd be so much information overload that people might just start trying to parse all the links and get lost :P
 
It is remarkable how intellectually devious and vapid this view is. Trump is indisputably the single most corrupt candidate ever to be nominated by a major party for president in the past hundred years. I mean it's not even in the same galaxy. Even the most GENEROUS interpretation where I pretend for the sake of humouring your ridiculous viewpoint that every single scandal reported by major papers about Hillary is correct.

Let's say she intentionally destroyed e-mails, knew material was classified but mishandled it anyway, was dealing in pay to play for her Foundation and asked Donna Brazile for her questions in person... none of it, and I mean none of it, could compare to the sheer insanity and cloud of corruption facing Trump.

Here is a man who literally - with photo evidence - uses his charity as a front for his own personal gain, buying portraits of himself and fixing fountains and paying for his son's eagle scout membership fee. Paying off legal fees using charity money. A man who crashes charity events when not invited, donates nothing but still wants the photo op. Who has lied about virtually all his giving ever. Who pretended to give money to 9/11 charities and pretending to give money to Veteran's Charities, until reporters started looking into it. Then magically a donation!

Who bends the law beyond all recognition in his pursuit of using other people's money to avoid paying taxes. Who we actually do have hard evidence of destroying emails and evidence in direct violation of a court order.

Who refuses to sell or recuse himself from any of his 500 businesses despite the unprecedented conflict of interest were he to become president. A man whose disgustingly predatory and fraudulent University was meant to target the elderly and uninformed and disenfranchised to steal their money. Who has been accused of so much sexual assault no reasonable individual could argue he is innocent of them all.

Who faced one of the largest housing discrimination suits in the country at the time, with accounts such as this:



There was no argument he was guilty or not. He was. You can argue otherwise. You'll embarrass yourself the millionth time and reveal yourself as a racist as well if you try. Good luck refuting that.

There is no reference point for the level of corruption Donald Trump is mired in. We don't even need to touch his rampantly racist, misogynistic, bigoted and xenophobic views, though you're probably terrible for ignoring those as well. If your problem is actually corruption and you're not lying, you are the single most grotesquely intellectually dishonest individual ever to grace this forum for making him your second choice. And yes, shame is something you should feel for not looking inside yourself and figuring out how you can be so goddamned disappointing.

FINISH HIM.
 
Why was the FBI investigating a federal pardon? That's a power invested into the President by the constitution of the United States. He can pardon anyone he wants for any reason he wants. Also, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton since she wasn't the President.
Yeah, timing is weird, especially drawing attention to it with the tweet.
 
Believe it or not I was gonna post about thirty more links I had handy, but I thought it'd be so much information overload that people might just start trying to parse all the links and get lost :P

do-it.gif
 
Believe it or not I was gonna post about thirty more links I had handy, but I thought it'd be so much information overload that people might just start trying to parse all the links and get lost :P

Please PLEASE post the rest of the links! You should post all of it.
 
If I'm going to do that let me turn it into a more formal format so that you guys can parse the information you want to use at any time with ease instead of having to listen to me bloviate. Give me a few hours to correctly format all the information and post it up.
 
If I'm going to do that let me turn it into a more formal format so that you guys can parse the information you want to use at any time with ease instead of having to listen to me bloviate. Give me a few hours to correctly format all the information and post it up.

I do enjoy the bloviation intermingled with the facts. It makes it more amusing. :)
 
It is remarkable how intellectually devious and vapid this view is. Trump is indisputably the single most corrupt candidate ever to be nominated by a major party for president in the past hundred years. I mean it's not even in the same galaxy. Even the most GENEROUS interpretation where I pretend for the sake of humouring your ridiculous viewpoint that every single scandal reported by major papers about Hillary is correct.

Let's say she intentionally destroyed e-mails, knew material was classified but mishandled it anyway, was dealing in pay to play for her Foundation and asked Donna Brazile for her questions in person... none of it, and I mean none of it, could compare to the sheer insanity and cloud of corruption facing Trump.

Here is a man who literally - with photo evidence - uses his charity as a front for his own personal gain, buying portraits of himself and fixing fountains and paying for his son's eagle scout membership fee. Paying off legal fees using charity money. A man who crashes charity events when not invited, donates nothing but still wants the photo op. Who has lied about virtually all his giving ever. Who pretended to give money to 9/11 charities and pretending to give money to Veteran's Charities, until reporters started looking into it. Then magically a donation!

Who bends the law beyond all recognition in his pursuit of using other people's money to avoid paying taxes. Who we actually do have hard evidence of destroying emails and evidence in direct violation of a court order.

Who refuses to sell or recuse himself from any of his 500 businesses despite the unprecedented conflict of interest were he to become president. A man whose disgustingly predatory and fraudulent University was meant to target the elderly and uninformed and disenfranchised to steal their money. Who has been accused of so much sexual assault no reasonable individual could argue he is innocent of them all.

Who faced one of the largest housing discrimination suits in the country at the time, with accounts such as this:



There was no argument he was guilty or not. He was. You can argue otherwise. You'll embarrass yourself the millionth time and reveal yourself as a racist as well if you try. Good luck refuting that.

There is no reference point for the level of corruption Donald Trump is mired in. We don't even need to touch his rampantly racist, misogynistic, bigoted and xenophobic views, though you're probably terrible for ignoring those as well. If your problem is actually corruption and you're not lying, you are the single most grotesquely intellectually dishonest individual ever to grace this forum for making him your second choice. And yes, shame is something you should feel for not looking inside yourself and figuring out how you can be so goddamned disappointing.

This deserves its own thread.
 
The Early Years: 1970s-1990s:

● 197X: The Jessica Leeds Sexual Assault Scandal - "He was like an Octopus."
● 1973: The New York Trump Housing Discrimination Scandal - Regularly gave rentals to white folk, turned away blacks.
● 1980-Present: The Refuse to Pay Contractors/Workers Scandal - Hundreds allege Trump would outright refuse to pay them even after work was done to exact specifications.
● 1981: The Trump Tenant Intimidation Scandal - Cut off heat, water, refused repairs to try to get rent controlled tenants out. Mushrooms literally grew in an apartment from leaks.
● 1986: Antitrust Violations - Fined $750,000 for failing to disclose purchase of stocks made with intent to take control of a company.
● 1988-Present: Trump Foundation Scandal - Used the "charity" as an extension of a personal bank, purchasing portraits of himself, fixing fountains at his own resorts, paying off his own legal fees.
● 1989: Ivana Rape Scandal - "According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, ‘he raped me.’" Trump's lawyer defense? You can't rape your wife.
● 1990: The Trump Casino Chip Scandal - Fined $30,000 when his father illegally entered casino and purchased 3.3 million in chips and gave it to his son as a bailout for his shitty business practices. Since he didn't intend to gamble, it was determined to be a loan and he was fined.
● 1990-?: The Tax Loophole/Avoidance Scandals - Bent tax laws beyond all recognition, ensuring he left investors with his debt, avoided paying taxes for potentially twenty years.
● 1991: The Robert LiButti Mafioso Scandal - Paid $200,000 fine for arranging to keep black employees away from Robert LiButti's gambling table. Paid another $450,000 fine for buying LiButti nine luxury cars.
● 1992: The American Dream Beauty Pageant Scandal - Deprived of $250,000 Fee, Rampant Misogyny and Unwanted Sexual Advances
● 1994: The Jeffrey Epstein/13 Year Old Jane Doe Rape Scandal - "Trump “proceeded to forcibly rape her.”
● 1997: The Teen Beauty Pageant Scandal - Abused his power to walk through the dressing room filled with nude underage girls. Said he has "seen it all before."
● 1998: The Cuban Embargo Scandal - Spent $68,000 in Cuba in violation of federal law through a shell company
● 1999: The Illegal Immigrant Model Scandal - Used Undocumented Immigrants for his modeling agency "It was like modern-day slavery."

The Later Years: 2000-2016:

● 2001: The Miss America Beauty Pageant Scandal - Repeatedly walked into the dressing room while contestants were nude, bragged about abusing his power to do it on Howard Stern
● 2003: The Mindy McGillivray Sexual Assault Scandal - "‘Donald just grabbed my ass!’’
● 2005: The Rachel Crooks Sexual Assault Scandal - "They shook hands, but Mr. Trump would not let go, she said. Then, she said, he “kissed me directly on the mouth.”
● 2005: The Trump University Scandal - Bilked customers out of $40 million dollars, a complete scam targeting the elderly, uninformed and disenfranchised.
● 2005: Trump Institute Scandal - Promised to "hand pick instructors" and gave his name for use for a clear get rich quick scam.
● 2005: The Access Hollywood Grab Them By the Pussy Scandal - Bragged about sexual assault on microphone, said he could do it because he is famous.
● 2006-2008: E-Mail Gate - Trump repeatedly destroyed e-mails and documents in defiance of a court order for multiple cases against him.
● 2016: The $55,000 Crippled America Book Scandal - Used campaign funds to purchase 5,000 copies of his own book.



I've got more, so, I'll add to it tomorrow. Gotta go to bed lol

Oh and some of these scandals have multiple links embedded in them because they are so complex and multilayered that one article can't cover all the corruption.


Don't forget, guys, both sides!
 
Why would Hillary give speeches to Donald Trump or people like him? Are you saying she chooses who she gives speeches to based on how corrupt they are? Weird.

Clearly. She definitely gives speeches to that kind of crowd because these folks commit fraud, have donated to Donald, and the firm has supported his work in real estate despite past allegations against him. I have no idea why or how she picks one over the other but maybe it has something to do with perceived power. Goldman's body of work is definitely in a different stratosphere compared to any of Trump's businesses in terms of shady behavior, corruption, and fraud.

In any event, I wouldn't want to be seen with anyone from Goldman Sachs following numerous allegations and settlements. Those were serious felonies they were accused of. The federal gov't obviously passed on securing convictions and ensured the firm could offset fines with tax offsets and faux consumer relief.

In my mind, any talks Hillary had with Goldman around that time should have been a simple request for employees to come forward with information about the fraud schemes they saw as other whistleblowers had done. Other than that what is there to talk about?
 
The Early Years: 1970s-1990s:

● 197X: The Jessica Leeds Sexual Assault Scandal - "He was like an Octopus."
● 1973: The New York Trump Housing Discrimination Scandal - Regularly gave rentals to white folk, turned away blacks.
● 1980-Present: The Refuse to Pay Contractors/Workers Scandal - Hundreds allege Trump would outright refuse to pay them even after work was done to exact specifications.
● 1981: The Trump Tenant Intimidation Scandal - Cut off heat, water, refused repairs to try to get rent controlled tenants out. Mushrooms literally grew in an apartment from leaks.
● 1986: Antitrust Violations - Fined $750,000 for failing to disclose purchase of stocks made with intent to take control of a company.
● 1988-Present: Trump Foundation Scandal - Used the "charity" as an extension of a personal bank, purchasing portraits of himself, fixing fountains at his own resorts, paying off his own legal fees.
● 1989: Ivana Rape Scandal - "According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, ‘he raped me.’" Trump's lawyer defense? You can't rape your wife.
● 1990: The Trump Casino Chip Scandal - Fined $30,000 when his father illegally entered casino and purchased 3.3 million in chips and gave it to his son as a bailout for his shitty business practices. Since he didn't intend to gamble, it was determined to be a loan and he was fined.
● 1990-?: The Tax Loophole/Avoidance Scandals - Bent tax laws beyond all recognition, ensuring he left investors with his debt, avoided paying taxes for potentially twenty years.
● 1991: The Robert LiButti Mafioso Scandal - Paid $200,000 fine for arranging to keep black employees away from Robert LiButti's gambling table. Paid another $450,000 fine for buying LiButti nine luxury cars.
● 1992: The American Dream Beauty Pageant Scandal - Deprived of $250,000 Fee, Rampant Misogyny and Unwanted Sexual Advances
● 1994: The Jeffrey Epstein/13 Year Old Jane Doe Rape Scandal - "Trump “proceeded to forcibly rape her.”
● 1997: The Teen Beauty Pageant Scandal - Abused his power to walk through the dressing room filled with nude underage girls. Said he has "seen it all before."
● 1998: The Cuban Embargo Scandal - Spent $68,000 in Cuba in violation of federal law
● 1999: The Illegal Immigrant Model Scandal - Used Undocumented Immigrants for his modeling agency "It was like modern-day slavery."

The Later Years: 2000-2016:

● 2001: The Miss America Beauty Pageant Scandal - Repeatedly walked into the dressing room while contestants were nude, bragged about abusing his power to do it on Howard Stern
● 2003: The Mindy McGillivray Sexual Assault Scandal - "‘Donald just grabbed my ass!’’
● 2005: The Rachel Crooks Sexual Assault Scandal - "They shook hands, but Mr. Trump would not let go, she said. Then, she said, he “kissed me directly on the mouth.”
● 2005: The Trump University Scandal - Bilked customers out of $40 million dollars, a complete scam targeting the elderly, uninformed and disenfranchised.
● 2005: Trump Institute Scandal - Promised to "hand pick instructors" and gave his name for use for a clear get rich quick scam.
● 2005: The Access Hollywood Grab Them By the Pussy Scandal - Bragged about sexual assault on microphone, said he could do it because he is famous.
● 2006-2008: E-Mail Gate - Trump repeatedly destroyed e-mails and documents in defiance of a court order for multiple cases against him.
● 2016: The $55,000 Crippled America Book Scandal - Used campaign funds to purchase 5,000 copies of his own book.



I've got more, so, I'll add to it tomorrow. Gotta go to bed lol

Oh and some of these scandals have multiple links embedded in them because they are so complex and multilayered that one article can't cover all the corruption.


Don't forget, guys, both sides!

My parents just called me a few days ago to ask who to vote for. They want all the pros and cons laid out in front of them. While I have a lot of information off the top of my head, a comprehensive list would be pretty amazing. If you have the time to put one together, I promise I'll make good use of it and get Clinton a few more votes. :-)

Hell, maybe we can get your list trending on Twitter. :-D
 
Clearly. She definitely gives speeches to that kind of crowd because these folks commit fraud, have donated to Donald, and the firm has supported his work in real estate despite past allegations against him. I have no idea why or how she picks one over the other but maybe it has something to do with perceived power. Goldman's body of work is definitely in a different stratosphere compared to any of Trump's businesses in terms of shady behavior, corruption, and fraud.

In any event, I wouldn't want to be seen with anyone from Goldman Sachs following numerous allegations and settlements. Those were serious felonies they were accused of. The federal gov't obviously passed on securing convictions and ensured the firm could offset fines with tax offsets and faux consumer relief.

In my mind, any talks Hillary had with Goldman around that time should have been a simple request for employees to come forward with information about the fraud schemes they saw as other whistleblowers had done. Other than that what is there to talk about?

That sounds like guilt by association to me. I'd say the main reason she spoke to them was campaign donated and well, because they were paying her.

That's perfectly legal and acceptable. It's not like they are the KKK or something.
 
My parents just called me a few days ago to ask who to vote for. They want all the pros and cons laid out in front of them. While I have a lot of information off the top of my head, a comprehensive list would be pretty amazing. If you have the time to put one together, I promise I'll make good use of it and get Clinton a few more votes. :-)

Hell, maybe we can get your list trending on Twitter. :-D

Yeah I'm focusing on corruption right now and will throw way more up on the list tomorrow, but what do you guys think... should I include a separate category for his worst racist, bigoted, xenophobic and misogynistic comments? I mean, there are literally so many I don't think I have the time to comprehensively get that sort of list done before election day though, but I can do a "Worst Of" sort of top twenty or something.
 
My point is Goldman Sachs is one of the worst in the business and Donald Trump is just a real estate developer supported by wild firms like Goldman Sachs. If Donald was the most corrupt around then Hillary would go give paid speeches to a businessman like him rather than business men and women like them.

GS is indeed one of the most corrupt companies, but if I had to choose between a GS surrogate (which I don't think Clinton is) and Trump, I'd take the GS guy without hesitation. Because for all his corruption, he'd at least be somewhat competent, wouldn't empower the racists, and wouldn't start throwing nukes around because he'd find fighting Isis without them too complicated...

It is really mind-boggling, that you have 40%+ of your population willing to bring this man into power.
 
Bipartisanship is dead.

I doubt we'll see any Republican in any sort of position appointed by Clinton.

Obama's naive thought that Republicans were ever going to work with him finally came back to bite him in the butt.
 
The Early Years: 1970s-1990s:

● 197X: The Jessica Leeds Sexual Assault Scandal - "He was like an Octopus."
● 1973: The New York Trump Housing Discrimination Scandal - Regularly gave rentals to white folk, turned away blacks.
● 1980-Present: The Refuse to Pay Contractors/Workers Scandal - Hundreds allege Trump would outright refuse to pay them even after work was done to exact specifications.
● 1981: The Trump Tenant Intimidation Scandal - Cut off heat, water, refused repairs to try to get rent controlled tenants out. Mushrooms literally grew in an apartment from leaks.
● 1986: Antitrust Violations - Fined $750,000 for failing to disclose purchase of stocks made with intent to take control of a company.
● 1988-Present: Trump Foundation Scandal - Used the "charity" as an extension of a personal bank, purchasing portraits of himself, fixing fountains at his own resorts, paying off his own legal fees.
● 1989: Ivana Rape Scandal - "According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, ‘he raped me.’" Trump's lawyer defense? You can't rape your wife.
● 1990: The Trump Casino Chip Scandal - Fined $30,000 when his father illegally entered casino and purchased 3.3 million in chips and gave it to his son as a bailout for his shitty business practices. Since he didn't intend to gamble, it was determined to be a loan and he was fined.
● 1990-?: The Tax Loophole/Avoidance Scandals - Bent tax laws beyond all recognition, ensuring he left investors with his debt, avoided paying taxes for potentially twenty years.
● 1991: The Robert LiButti Mafioso Scandal - Paid $200,000 fine for arranging to keep black employees away from Robert LiButti's gambling table. Paid another $450,000 fine for buying LiButti nine luxury cars.
● 1992: The American Dream Beauty Pageant Scandal - Deprived of $250,000 Fee, Rampant Misogyny and Unwanted Sexual Advances
● 1994: The Jeffrey Epstein/13 Year Old Jane Doe Rape Scandal - "Trump “proceeded to forcibly rape her.”
● 1997: The Teen Beauty Pageant Scandal - Abused his power to walk through the dressing room filled with nude underage girls. Said he has "seen it all before."
● 1998: The Cuban Embargo Scandal - Spent $68,000 in Cuba in violation of federal law through a shell company
● 1999: The Illegal Immigrant Model Scandal - Used Undocumented Immigrants for his modeling agency "It was like modern-day slavery."

The Later Years: 2000-2016:

● 2001: The Miss America Beauty Pageant Scandal - Repeatedly walked into the dressing room while contestants were nude, bragged about abusing his power to do it on Howard Stern
● 2003: The Mindy McGillivray Sexual Assault Scandal - "‘Donald just grabbed my ass!’’
● 2005: The Rachel Crooks Sexual Assault Scandal - "They shook hands, but Mr. Trump would not let go, she said. Then, she said, he “kissed me directly on the mouth.”
● 2005: The Trump University Scandal - Bilked customers out of $40 million dollars, a complete scam targeting the elderly, uninformed and disenfranchised.
● 2005: Trump Institute Scandal - Promised to "hand pick instructors" and gave his name for use for a clear get rich quick scam.
● 2005: The Access Hollywood Grab Them By the Pussy Scandal - Bragged about sexual assault on microphone, said he could do it because he is famous.
● 2006-2008: E-Mail Gate - Trump repeatedly destroyed e-mails and documents in defiance of a court order for multiple cases against him.
● 2016: The $55,000 Crippled America Book Scandal - Used campaign funds to purchase 5,000 copies of his own book.



I've got more, so, I'll add to it tomorrow. Gotta go to bed lol

Oh and some of these scandals have multiple links embedded in them because they are so complex and multilayered that one article can't cover all the corruption.


Don't forget, guys, both sides!

Ok, sure. But you're still dumping this shit in a thread not about that person.

We can't discuss Hillary Clinton in any negative way because Donald Trump is a bad person? On this page alone so far Trumps name comes up 70+ times.
 
Ok, sure. But you're still dumping this shit in a thread not about that person.

We can't discuss Hillary Clinton in any negative way because Donald Trump is a bad person? On this page alone so far Trumps name comes up 70+ times.

Somebody brought up the fact that he is rooting for Trump because he isn't corrupt.
 
Ok, sure. But you're still dumping this shit in a thread not about that person.

We can't discuss Hillary Clinton in any negative way because Donald Trump is a bad person? On this page alone so far Trumps name comes up 70+ times.

Because the argument that people are gauging from this piece of shit non-story innuendo garbage is that they have a choice between two evil candidates, either equally or only tepidly less so. This comment has been made multiple times in this topic, and is directly on conversation.

It is so blatantly intellectually dishonest that it is time to put to bed the lie. Hillary does not even rank in the top 30 of most corrupt Presidential Candidates. With the leaks of her e-mails and speeches and whatnot, she is now unwittingly the single most transparent politician ever to be entering office. And given what people usually write about in private, the fact that we have found virtually nothing damning or illegal from her is remarkable, since the hacks were intended to do just that.

Instead we have a lot of shit about taking specific policy positions, very wonky talk, a campaign with brutally honest critics of Hillary - a good thing, less echo chambers! - and someone who has taken the time to seek out and help the poor and disenfranchised and minority groups. She expresses genuine empathy and concern about the plight of constituents. She has wonderfully genuine friendships with her confidants. She is amazingly kind and competent. Her speeches in Wall Street in some ways made her MORE liberal. There has been no Pay to Play exposed despite conspiracy nutter bullshit interpretation, no intentional mishandling of Classified Info, no scheming murderer or hater.

Yet we want to talk about both sides TRASH, when the worst thing we found was Donna Brazile taking things into her own hands to leak questions even a mentally challenged individual could figure out would be in debates. So it's time to fight back against gross opinions trying to normalize Trump behaviors and diminish the qualifications of a supremely competent and capable leader who we have a long record of public service helping people.
 
Because the argument that people are gauging from this piece of shit non-story innuendo garbage is that they have a choice between two evil candidates, either equally or only tepidly less so. This comment has been made multiple times in this topic, and is directly on conversation.

It is so blatantly intellectually dishonest that it is time to put to bed the lie. Hillary does not even rank in the top 30 of most corrupt Presidential Candidates. With the leaks of her e-mails and speeches and whatnot, she is now unwittingly the single most transparent politician ever to be entering office. And given what people usually write about in private, the fact that we have found virtually nothing damning or illegal from her is remarkable, since the hacks were intended to do just that.

Instead we have a lot of shit about taking specific policy positions, very wonky talk, a campaign with brutally honest critics of Hillary - a good thing, less echo chambers! - and someone who has time and time sought out to help the poor and disenfranchised and minority groups. She expresses genuine empathy and concern about the plight of constituents. She has wonderfully genuine friendships with her confidants. She is amazingly kind and competent. Her speeches in Wall Street in some ways made her MORE liberal. There has been no Pay to Play exposed despite conspiracy nutter bullshit interpretation, no intentional mishandling of Classified Info, no scheming murderer or hater.

Yet we want to talk about both sides TRASH, when the worst thing we found was Donna Brazile taking things into her own hands to leak questions even a mentally challenged individual could figure out would be in debates. So it's time to fight back against gross opinions trying to normalize Trump behaviors and diminish the qualifications of a supremely competent and capable leader who we have a long record of public service helping people.

Please start a thread devoted to listing bad trump stuff and include links and sources...basically what you are already doing but not buried in some other thread. :)
 
I will though I can't promise you ModBot won't close it. Although in the topic I'm building, I am going to be trying to comprehensively list Hillary Scandals, so people can legitimately compare and contrast. She has a few, but they're relatively tepid by comparison.
 
Yeah I'm focusing on corruption right now and will throw way more up on the list tomorrow, but what do you guys think... should I include a separate category for his worst racist, bigoted, xenophobic and misogynistic comments? I mean, there are literally so many I don't think I have the time to comprehensively get that sort of list done before election day though, but I can do a "Worst Of" sort of top twenty or something.

I dont remember who it was, but when I asked about a comprehensive list of potential Trump problems, someone provided the following list:

http://quantum-displacement.tumblr.com/post/146015554444/anti-trump-masterpost

Just in case anyone else would like to see.
 
Please start a thread devoted to listing bad trump stuff and include links and sources...basically what you are already doing but not buried in some other thread. :)

I don't know if we need another echo chamber thread. I mean if someone creates that one, we need to have a similar one for the Clintons.

They are both bad and have a lot of shady stuff in their rearview mirror. People on either side will turn a blind eye to all of it and explain away why it doesn't matter. I see no upside to creating that type of thread.
 
I don't know if we need another echo chamber thread. I mean if someone creates that one, we need to have a similar one for the Clintons.

They are both bad and have a lot of shady stuff in their rearview mirror. People on either side will turn a blind eye to all of it and explain away why it doesn't matter. I see no upside to creating that type of thread.
He said that he's putting together a list of Hillarys controversies as well.
 
I will though I can't promise you ModBot won't close it. Although in the topic I'm building, I am going to be trying to comprehensively list Hillary Scandals, so people can legitimately compare and contrast. She has a few, but they're relatively tepid by comparison.

Can't wait to see the full list. thank you Ami, i really appreciate this.
 
Hey don't get me wrong! The US as the worst choice ever I just don't think the tax thing is a very good argument, the tax thing got chucked about loads early on and nothing stuck.I would be a never Clinton person tho! If I was able to vote, way to much smoke n all that.

As opposed to the actual dumpster fire that is Trump's 13 sexual assault allegations, child rape case, and ADMITTED sexual assault of women?

That's before you even get to him deleting e-mails that were subpoenaed about his companies, and his fraud case this month.

I'm guessing you must absolutely loathe him.

we need to have a similar one for Hillary Clinton*.

They are both bad and have a lot of shady stuff in their rearview mirror. People on either side will turn a blind eye to all of it and explain away why it doesn't matter. I see no upside to creating that type of thread.

A) Hillary isn't Bill and they aren't a symbiote

B) Nothing Hillary has done is even remotely equivalent to the laundry list of depravity and crime Trump has amassed, and the "but both sides" thing is total trash in this case
 
I don't know if we need another echo chamber thread. I mean if someone creates that one, we need to have a similar one for the Clintons.

They are both bad and have a lot of shady stuff in their rearview mirror. People on either side will turn a blind eye to all of it and explain away why it doesn't matter. I see no upside to creating that type of thread.

And this is why the thread is worth making. Because they are not both bad, and one is so many million of times worse that trying to make it so is akin to intentionally deceiving oneself. Still, the thread might be redundant for folk. But I'm going to use it to destroy this vacuous argument once and for all.

People need to start rubbing brain cells together, it is infuriating ignorance bordering on willful misconduct of ones intellectual capacity.
 
And this is why the thread is worth making. Because they are not both bad, and one is so many million of times worse that and trying to make it so is akin to intentionally deceiving oneself. Still, the thread might be redundant for folk. But I'm going to use it to destroy this vacuous argument once and for all.

People need to start rubbing brain cells together, it is infuriating.
They are historically unfavorably rated. I think it's fair to say they are both bad.

Only one is qualified and capable of doing the job, but that doesn't automatically make her a good candidate.
 
I don't know if we need another echo chamber thread. I mean if someone creates that one, we need to have a similar one for the Clintons.

They are both bad and have a lot of shady stuff in their rearview mirror. People on either side will turn a blind eye to all of it and explain away why it doesn't matter. I see no upside to creating that type of thread.
Great example as to why the thread is needed.
 
They are historically unfavorably rated. I think it's fair to say they are both bad.

I would argue that favorability ratings and whether or not someone is actually a good candidate are not the same thing.

(I mean, they are, insofar as being a "good candidate" hinges partly on electability, but that's not what people usually mean when they say "they're both bad".)
 
They are historically unfavorably rated. I think it's fair to say they are both bad.

Only one is qualified and capable of doing the job, but that doesn't automatically make her a good candidate.

This is like the chicken or egg bullshit. She is the single most unfairly scrutinized and attacked candidate in modern American history. She has had 30 years being dragged through the mud by investigations run by offensively corrupt Republicans who literally spent MORE ON BENGHAZI than WATERGATE. Not once in all that time have even Republicans been able to find a single illegal or genuinely offensive thing she has done, except be a bit "careless" with e-mails. That is remarkable for such a intensely public figure. Maybe you don't understand how often the public scrutiny destroys politicians, but the fact she has sustained such withering attacks and they have found the equivalent of jack and shit on a hill is simply incredible. THIS is the Hillary we find in e-mails:

EMail said:
From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]

Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:39 PM

To: Verveer, Melanne S

Subject: Noori Ali

Do you recall Noori Ali(?), the ten year old Yemeni girl who got herself divorced? I met her at the Glamour awards last year. There was a CNN story last few days about how unhappy she is, still living at home, not attending school and quite angry that her life is not better. Is there any way we can help her? Could we get her to the US for counselling and education?

In other words, she is not historically unfavorable because she is a bad candidate - that is a farcical reading of modern history. She has historical unfavorables because the Republicans have run the single most organized, directed defamation campaign seen in the last 100 years of political history. Whenever she enters office and is doing her job, her approval ratings soar. Because it is impossible to make a caricature out of someone who is self-evidently so competent and well informed. Who shows such genuine compassion for her constituents.

That the Republican smear campaign of fabrications and imaginary musings has hurt is beyond argument; that this is equivalent to meaning the person at the receiving end of attacks is a bad candidate is pathetically naive. And this "bad candidate", for all Republicans have tried to do, is still set to fucking destroy Trump in the election. And contrary to terrible reporting, it ain't a protest vote against Trump. Polling bears it out: People voting for Hillary are generally enthusiastic about her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom