![]()
Dude looks good with gold too.
Who is somebody who doesn't look good with gold?
Too cool?
Who is somebody who doesn't look good with gold?
Too cool?
Stop putting down my friend, FallingEdge.
Bean, thanks for your help but it has been one vs all since the beginning. Now get the hell out of my locker room.
Who is somebody who doesn't look good with gold?
Too cool?
I couldn't see you on Raw last night, ergo your time is now. To explain yourself.
Go back to what they first talked about. You have to believe YOUR character 100 PERCENT. Noticed how he never referred to him as Paul. It's all a work brah. Triple H could be THE guy. This interview proves it.I love that one podcast makes you all forget how huge of an ego HHH had his whole career. Why would he change just because he has power in WWE now? Punk was injured, you can tell by how broken and bandaged he was the year before he quit. He was promised a title shot at Mania multiple times, and was passed over multiple times for part-timers.
Austin, Rock, hell HHH would've walked out too if he had to work with a guy who pulls his quad everytime he steps in a ring. Ryback is still a shitty character.
The way Punk tells the story, he talked to Vince directly, so I understand if HHH never got the idea that Punk had a problem with him until early last year.
We got a Daniel Bryan WMXXX moment out of all the drama and politics, so thanks Punk.
Hunter interview was great. Proved one thing more than anything else, Hunter gives a shit about what people think of him.
He gave a great explanation of what 'WWE superstar' meant in relation to 'wrestler'. Vince wouldn't have given any shits what people thought about why he is using the term. Even Steve looked pleased with that answer.
Plus he said all the right stuff us smarks wanted to hear. All about Raw going back to 2 hours, slow burn storylines, telling Kevin Dunn to fuck up and give them 10 more minutes, etc. Also interesting how he pointed at all the TV guys there and joked they were old and his NXT crew were being trained to replace them LOL.
Dude has the chops to be the top suit, he even made a remark about leaving the finance stuff up to other people just to remove that argument against him being in charge.
Like others have said, do that more often. Steve is great and seems to be able to make the person being interviewed comfortable enough to be candidly entertaining.
Holy shit this thread exploded. Was only like 22 pages 12 hours ago! Was Raw good? Was Raw worth watching guys?
Maybe if they scaled the belt to his size?
Well that's just mean and uncalled for.Cesaro. Or at least he'll never again get the chance to show you because he's officially a loser and playing second fiddle to Tyson Kidd's wife's cat.
![]()
Love ya Mick, but no.
Mick fit better with the hardcore belt.
Still there is something cool as fuck about a guy like him getting a chance to hold the belt.
True on both accounts, friend.
But anything other than that beat up old hardcore belt that didn't even have a lot of gold on it, just looked fucking weird on him.
I love that one podcast makes you all forget how huge of an ego HHH had his whole career. Why would he change just because he has power in WWE now? Punk was injured, you can tell by how broken and bandaged he was the year before he quit. He was promised a title shot at Mania multiple times, and was passed over multiple times for part-timers.
Austin, Rock, hell HHH would've walked out too if he had to work with a guy who pulls his quad everytime he steps in a ring. Ryback is still a shitty character.
The way Punk tells the story, he talked to Vince directly, so I understand if HHH never got the idea that Punk had a problem with him until early last year.
We got a Daniel Bryan WMXXX moment out of all the drama and politics, so thanks Punk.
I don't know what any of this has to do with HHH as a backstage boss running a promotion. Of course he's egotistical, that's not news. But it also doesn't really matter if he's not an on-screen performer, which I doubt he would be if he was running the WWE.
Vince was an on-screen performer until he was almost 70.I don't know what any of this has to do with HHH as a backstage boss running a promotion. Of course he's egotistical, that's not news. But it also doesn't really matter if he's not an on-screen performer, which I doubt he would be if he was running the WWE.
Vince was an on-screen performer until he was almost 70.
I actually agree.Seth Rollins is better.
I just want to mention that Ryback and Harper had a really great match last night
First 40 minutesLast night was an improvement. Aside from them dancing around the term "booking" in place of controversy I'd say they had a good show.
What was the worst part of the night?
The divas segment?
Last night was an improvement. Aside from them dancing around the term "booking" in place of controversy I'd say they had a good show.
What was the worst part of the night?
The divas segment?
I think you mean "four years now". He was a regular right up until just after Punk walked out with the belt four years ago. Heck, Vince was ECW champion 8 years ago.Vince hasn't been a regular on-screen character for years now.
I wasn't pissed at the Royal Rumble because Daniel Bryan didn't win. I was annoyed because the match itself was the most uninspired shit again just handing the win in the most predictable of ways, just like last year and that they booked Kane/Big Show to try and put over Reigns rather than having a more worthy final four.
Daniel not winning is a non factor for I.
I just want to mention that Ryback and Harper had a really great match last night
I think there are also still questions on if Roman can main event a PPV.
Can he really work a 15 minute match?
They need to put him in an angle with Kevin Nash to find out.
They need to put him in an angle with Kevin Nash to find out.
That's not fair - Nash takes 14 minutes to get to the ring.
I wasn't pissed at the Royal Rumble because Daniel Bryan didn't win. I was annoyed because the match itself was the most uninspired shit again just handing the win in the most predictable of ways, just like last year and that they booked Kane/Big Show to try and put over Reigns rather than having a more worthy final four.
Daniel not winning is a non factor for I.
I know they added advertisements to the network but does anyone actually get any?
I know they added advertisements to the network but does anyone actually get any?
HHH seemed to allude to the NXT booking not totally working on Raw because NXT was aimed more for the hardcore audience. I'm not sure I totally agree with that mindset mostly because the stuff that makes NXT work are simple things that would work on Raw also.
I guess having a show that doesn't insult your intelligence is only for the hardcore crowds.
HHH seemed to allude to the NXT booking not totally working on Raw because NXT was aimed more for the hardcore audience. I'm not sure I totally agree with that mindset mostly because the stuff that makes NXT work are simple things that would work on Raw also.
I guess having a show that doesn't insult your intelligence is only for the hardcore crowds.
I don't see how it can't work. Its not as though all of the characters couldn't work on a larger stage.
Sadly we all know the answer to this:
Vince
Dunn
Hayes
Cases in point - Nattie farting, Paige's hotshotting to the belt, Alicia Fox snapping and then disappearing.