I'm glad the lewd thing was raised. I think I'm a good example of why this was an issue (I didn't tell on you guys, though, I promise it wasn't me).
A while ago I made a post on this and tried to sorta raise my concerns gently, but it kinda didn't go anywhere.
Basically, I'm a guy who's into cool figures, collectibles, I like figmas, and I'm just a general collector of cool things. I'm not especially into any niche things, and while I won't rule out a statue that is asthetically beautiful or in some way "sexy", I don't think I'd ever own anything "lewd".
That's not to say I particularly care if anyone else wants to own things that are "lewd", but the feel in the thread made me feel a bit out of place, with the sheer volume of attention and posts being in some way related to the sexiness of inanimate objects. In particular, there's at least some tolerance of imagery/discussion of statues that depict clearly underage looking characters in a sexual manner -- and while I agree there's some amount of self policing here on this, to the thread's credit, it didn't seem like enough and it kinda made me feel less comfortable participating. I don't think it's productive to single out/shame anyone, but there definitely have been statues displayed and discussed in this thread that, for lack of a better word, are creepy.
anyway, just my two cents. put me on team "more inclusive" (as opposed to "team lewd").