Dubbedinenglish
Banned
Superbooty
SUPERMAN THE XXX PARODY: BOTTOMS UP
I tried.
Idk, that looks pretty great. Better than Supergirl IMO.
Maxima has to be back in Season 2, right?
Wait, doesn't he refer to him as "the big guy" in season 1? He always refers to him being larger than life in his talks with Kara and the dude is like 5'6.
Edit: Apparently he's 6'0 and Mehcad is 6'3. I don't believe this.
This butt-shaming is uncalled for.To be fair...doubt we will see Datass pose from this perspective in the show...but yeah not the best look lol.
Is that his rib cage? Dude looks emaciated.
Superman's suit...is colourful?
And he's....smiling?
Not my Superman. Fuck this shit.
Ahh, that is better.
Wow I didn't know the Snyder filter ruined the Cavill suit so much
The hair style on Cavill was so much better in MoS.
The hair style on Cavill was so much better in MoS.
But wait! Colour can be good! And smiling! Superman can be fun! He can be-
Oh. Yes.
Darkness.
You deconstruct that icon, Mr Snyder.
You deconstruct him good.
That's because back then, Cavill had more hair to style.
No it can't!
Keep going Zack, we'reproud of you!I'm
Ahh, I can't stand the no pants look! They need to bring back the red underwear!
Yeah, I hate the fact that Superman is apparently forbidden wearing his iconic red trunks now. He just looks wrong without them, somehow.
At least the artists at DC Comics are finding new ways around the problem...
Never ceases to amaze me that the suit is actually colorful and that Cavill has some charm.
No it can't!
Keep going Zack, we'reproud of you!I'm
No it can't!
Keep going Zack, we'reproud of you!I'm
From what I heard way back when the Siegel vs. DC lawsuit was going on over ownership of Superman, there were a TON of little things DC had to change going forward while it was still undecided. In legal terms the Siegel family had claims to things like the spit curl and red trunks and a few other things I can't recall and can't fucking find anymore since the case was won by DC. DC did away with them in case they lost the rights to use them in the future, and it just kind of stuck from there. It's partially why the New 52 Superman was so different, as well.
Of course, being that I can't find the original article that explained all the nuances of the suit, I may be completely wrong. I do know that there was a ton of shit about the character that was in legal limbo when the changes were made for the New 52, though.
IDGAF this looks fucking awesome
I found this really interesting, thank you. If you ever get around to tracking down the original article, I'd love to give it a read.
Warner Bros. no longer has access to Superman’s origins.
Variety reports that on Wednesday, Judge Stephen Larson ruled that the Siegels now control a lot of Superman’s early history, including his brief infancy on Krypton, his parents, baby Kal-El and the whole “sent to Earth from a dying planet” storyline. The Siegels also captured ownership of early Superman comic-strips and early Superman/Action Comics issues. So what does this mean for film fans?
I found this really interesting, thank you. If you ever get around to tracking down the original article, I'd love to give it a read.
How is Justice League coming along, Mr Snyder?
How is Justice League coming along, Mr Snyder?
Dat...
I found this really interesting, thank you. If you ever get around to tracking down the original article, I'd love to give it a read.
How is Justice League coming along, Mr Snyder?
In 2008, the same court order ruled on summary judgment that the Siegels had successfully recaptured (as of 1999) Siegels copyright in Action Comics No. 1, giving them rights to the Superman character, including his costume, his alter-ego as reporter Clark Kent, the feisty reporter Lois Lane, their jobs at the Daily Planet newspaper working for a gruff editor, and the love triangle among Clark/Superman and Lois.