Canelo would get taken to school again.
Only if he flunked class.
Mayweather already taught him what happens if Canelo stepped again.
Canelo would get taken to school again.
Blame the division. Fact is, he spanked all of them, with some of those fights without losing a single round.
Chris Eubank was happy and content with his contract with SKY. Roy didn't want to go overseas, and Eubank wouldn't come here. Thus, why the fight never happened.
the same Eubank that said fighting Jones (or Toney for that matter) in their primes would have been suicide? cool story though
uhhh only thing that stopped roy jones jr was trying to have a rap career then moving up in weight class. He was a bigger sensation and Golden Boy when he broke out.
Floyd don't wanna see Triple G
Floyd don't wanna see Triple G
and berto can?
GGG won't fight andre ward without a catch weight. That's who he should be fighting.
even though it seemed that way Floyd's strategy tore down Manny, it was interesting to see Floyd's counterpunching at work. Everyone expected a fast flurry and win by Manny but it didn't materialize. Instead it was a "shoulder" issue.
He may have seemed like running but even as Lennox Lewis said "it's textbook Mayweather"
![]()
![]()
I blame Rocky and movies like it where dudes are just eating punches for making people believe that's really what boxing is like.
GGG won't fight andre ward without a catch weight. That's who he should be fighting.
You do realize that Triple G is 2 to 3 weight classes more heavier than he is?
Next we'll ask Floyd to fight a Heavyweight.
Berto doesn't have a chance in hell. Brook & Thurman have a punchers chance at best (and that is a maybe, MAYBE, because of May's age - but he didn't show it against Manny), but no-one at 147 comes close to the women beating tosser.
I don't know if Floyd is just that good or if the talent level at 140 to 147 ain't as good people think it is.
Guys like Thurman, Khan and Garcia are good fighters, but if they're not fighting a corpse or a cab driver, they'll look average at best. At 37 there has to be someone that's a threat to Floyd. With the current landscape of boxing, Floyd can fight till he's 40 and still be undefeated.
He's beaten some genuine ATG's in ODLH, JMM & Manny, but the gap is bigger than ever between him and the top challengers, I agree. He's kinda like welterweights own Wladimir. People can say he's boring, but he never looks troubled, and puts every challenger down when given the fight.
Wlad looked awful against Jennings and will hit the deck against Fury, so..
Wlad looked awful against Jennings and will hit the deck against Fury, so..
Wlad looked awful against Jennings and will hit the deck against Fury, so..
I've been following Fury's career for 5 years now. I think he's a very entertaining fighter (at times), and his personality never ceases to make me laugh...
But Wlad will (most likely) destroy him.
Destroy eh? I had the Jennings fight almost even going into the last round (had Wlad like 1 round ahead and he won the 12th as well). Fury is the real deal and will clown Wlad.
Destroy eh? I had the Jennings fight almost even going into the last round (had Wlad like 1 round ahead and he won the 12th as well). Fury is the real deal and will clown Wlad.
Roy Jones Jr. wasn't even the best in the sport when he was in his prime.
Question: Would it have been impossible for him to get a body shot after he ducked the second punch? Or would that have been too risky?
Who was better than Roy during his prime? He was P4P the best in the game....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPU5qFJAJGg
Is that supposed to be impressive, given his fights? Are you really telling me wins over guys like Merqui Sosa or Eric Lucas count much?
Similar reason why he never fought Michalczewski maybe? I find it weird to call someone unbeatable that didn't even unify super middleweight belts or fight arguably the toughest competitor though.
Who was better than Roy during his prime? He was P4P the best in the game....
Yes it is because past champions fought cans and those cans still took a few rounds.
Why do people always bring up Michalczewski against Jones?
None of the Euro champions didn't stand a chance against a prime Roy.
Roy Jones Jr. wasn't even the best in the sport when he was in his prime.
How convenient that he never boxed any of them.
The fact that Roy has a win over Hopkins is more impressive than any opponent the Euro champions faced.
I think it's safe to say that he wasn't best in the world from at least 1999 onwards and his professional career wasn't particularly important before 1994. That leaves 1994-1998.
In that time period you also have the rise of Oscar De La Hoya and Felix Trinidad. I don't think too highly of the heavyweight division of the 90s, but you could probably also make a case for Holyfield and Lewis. For those that like British boxers you might even bring up Naseem Hamed.
The only other guy that had a case from 94-96 was Sweet Pea, Oscar was all hype.
I'll be there!.When it hits Youtube
This is all bullshit anyways. Pac/Floyd 2 will obviously be the last fight. Why would he pass on 50-0 and another 200mil check?
Is that supposed to be impressive, given his fights? Are you really telling me wins over guys like Merqui Sosa or Eric Lucas count much?
Similar reason why he never fought Michalczewski maybe? I find it weird to call someone unbeatable that didn't even unify super middleweight belts or fight arguably the toughest competitor though.
So I take it you admit his title run was disappointing and that he didn't unify any titles, nor fight the biggest competition (such as Eubank or Benn), but instead guys like Eric Lucas?
Regarding the quote, I vaguely recall him (Eubank) saying he would've lost to Toney, but not much else. You don't happen to have a link, do you?
He deserves enormous respect for his accomplishments, no doubt. Winning titles in these weight classes is an incredible achievement. That said, he avoided some very good competition in super middleweight and heavyweight. His light heavyweight run is arguably his best by far, even if he didn't fight Michalczewski.
If you take a look at his actual resume, not the hype or legend, it's hard to make a case for him as the best fighter for most of his career (which might be unfair given his divisions). He's still an all-time great, because winning in all these weight classes is incredible, even if the competition wasn't always the best.