DOBERMAN INC
Member
Remember Mata![]()
And Eden Hazard,Özil,Kaka,Benzema...Alonso,David Villa the list goes on.
Remember Mata![]()
Trying to look on the brightside.
The IPO is successful and we reduce debt by £75m. We have a decent season and at least make the CL QF. Revenue increases and debt is paid down a bit more.
The Chevrolet deal is, in fact, as large as Reuters are reporting. We use that money to at least partially pay down more of our debt and reduce the interest bill.
#graspingatstraws
Wanyama I believe. City were supposedly interested in him about 6-8 weeks ago but nothing has come of it. I think a £10-11 valuation was mentioned for him. I know Celtic paid less than £1m.
If it does come to that, then I hope we hold out for a ridiculous price and don't give one or both of them away too cheaply - our negotiation skills haven't exactly been brilliant in recent times, except for Torres that is.Forgot to add that.
It's the thoughts of the club, that we'd only accept an offer that's so great it'd be tough to refuse because of the good it could do to the squad overall.
I've read a lot of reactionary moaning and whining about that on RAWK, but as I see it, that's what running a football club is: turning over your prized assets at their peak and using that to invest and improve. If we hadn't spunked the Torres money up the wall it would've been considered one of the greatest transfer moves in history, but unfortunately for us Mike Ashley scooped that award on the same day.
I love Agger, and Skrtel, but if an offer comes in that's exceptional, and we'll hold City out for a huge offer because we know they've got the money, then we'd be mad to say no. They're both 27, both in their peak, and both worth a lot of money. As long as it's reinvested wisely then we'll do well.
Forgot to add that.
It's the thoughts of the club, that we'd only accept an offer that's so great it'd be tough to refuse because of the good it could do to the squad overall.
I've read a lot of reactionary moaning and whining about that on RAWK, but as I see it, that's what running a football club is: turning over your prized assets at their peak and using that to invest and improve. If we hadn't spunked the Torres money up the wall it would've been considered one of the greatest transfer moves in history, but unfortunately for us Mike Ashley scooped that award on the same day.
I love Agger, and Skrtel, but if an offer comes in that's exceptional, and we'll hold City out for a huge offer because we know they've got the money, then we'd be mad to say no. They're both 27, both in their peak, and both worth a lot of money. As long as it's reinvested wisely then we'll do well.
Forgot to add that.
It's the thoughts of the club, that we'd only accept an offer that's so great it'd be tough to refuse because of the good it could do to the squad overall.
I've read a lot of reactionary moaning and whining about that on RAWK, but as I see it, that's what running a football club is: turning over your prized assets at their peak and using that to invest and improve. If we hadn't spunked the Torres money up the wall it would've been considered one of the greatest transfer moves in history, but unfortunately for us Mike Ashley scooped that award on the same day.
I love Agger, and Skrtel, but if an offer comes in that's exceptional, and we'll hold City out for a huge offer because we know they've got the money, then we'd be mad to say no. They're both 27, both in their peak, and both worth a lot of money. As long as it's reinvested wisely then we'll do well.
Exactly. If City want to buy one of our prized assets, then we're going to get a big payday from it, and I'd expect Rodgers to be able to reinvest all of that in the squad. We may lose one of the best defenders in the league, when fit, but we could get a perfectly decent CB to replace him at half what we sell him for, then still have the other half to sort out our attacking issues.
Agree with all of this, but Skragger have at least 5 more years at their peak. Would want a hefty sum for ether, or both, of them.
"But on Monday, GM and Manchester United announced that Chevrolet will be the club's shirt sponsor beginning with the 2014/2015 season."Chevrolet's name won't be on the jersey. No wonder that exec got fired.
Everyone but Suso. Even fucking Aquilani gets on before he does.
I think the sponsorship they are referring to in that article is the 'Official Automobile Partner'.Chevrolet's name won't be on the jersey. No wonder that exec got fired.
And Eden Hazard,Özil,Kaka,Benzema...Alonso,David Villa the list goes on.
I thought the atmosphere regarding United's financial stability looked grim last night, tonight it's like Chernobyl.
Venkys seem like they'd be a good fit. Jeff would be happy too. Everyone's a winner!
Everyone but Suso. Even fucking Aquilani gets on before he does.
I think the sponsorship they are referring to in that article is the 'Official Automobile Partner'.
edit: Actually I'm not entirely sure what the article is referring to but they definitely will be on the shirt after the Aon contract expires.
LA Times said:Reuters and the Wall Street Journal said sources familiar with the situation reported Ewanick’s departure was tied to not properly vetting and reporting the financial details about Chevrolet’s sponsorship of Manchester United.
Among the criticisms of the transaction was that the sponsorship did not appear to include Chevrolet’s name on the jerseys of the soccer club’s players. Unlike the major American sports, advertising is a prominent feature of soccer uniforms, giving the sponsors what are essentially kicking and running billboards for television cameras and photographers.
I thought the atmosphere regarding United's financial stability looked grim last night, tonight it's like Chernobyl.
Maybe it's saying that the logo will only be on the shirt, not the name beneath it?I think the sponsorship they are referring to in that article is the 'Official Automobile Partner'.
edit: Actually I'm not entirely sure what the article is referring to but they definitely will be on the shirt after the Aon contract expires.
Welcome Andy Carroll, please enjoy your stay in East London.
WTF at Suso not being in the squad. We have SIX goalkeepers in the squad, but Suso isn't there. Has to be a mistake, surely.
He won't agree. I've got a suspicion that the only reason we've accepted is to spark Newcastle into action. If they appear with a concrete bid above the £15 million then I believe Carroll will be back in Newcastle.
WTF at Suso not being in the squad. We have SIX goalkeepers in the squad, but Suso isn't there. Has to be a mistake, surely.
6-0 win, Pepe hat-trick.Gonna use Pepe in midfield, you see.
IPO prospectus: the level of debt and interest is negatively affecting our ability to compete, we will use the proceeds of the IPO to bring debt levels down to more manageable levels.
What the fucking fuck? There is surely something wrong there. There is no way he can't be in the submitted squad intentionally. Perhaps there was a screwup somewhere. Or maybe B-Rod really disliked his tweet the other day?
Mate just stop reading about it. That's what I've done...we know the deal, no need to know the details...at least not right now.From the original draft of the IPO:
And now all we get is £75m off the debt and £4.4m a year off in interest.
Yep, just wait and see how the IPO goes.Mate just stop reading about it. That's what I've done...we know the deal, no need to know the details...at least not right now.
Oh, God. The people of Tampa paid for 100% of the Bucs' new stadium, and then had to pay Glazer to use it?! Ridiculous.
He won't agree. I've got a suspicion that the only reason we've accepted is to spark Newcastle into action. If they appear with a concrete bid above the £15 million then I believe Carroll will be back in Newcastle.
Am I right in thinking that the IPO has been fully underwritten by the banks?
Wouldn't that mean the Glazers will still get their money, regardless of interest from investors?
lol that's not how Ashley operates. We'll never get into a bidding war. Especially not with the likes of West Ham, especially not over the likes of Andy Carroll.
I think the problem you're facing right now is Carroll doesn't want to go to West Ham, otherwise their deal would be good for you.
Well then if the bank's read that prospectus, they surely can't be stupid enough to make a firm commitment.Depends on what sort of offer they do. If it's a firm commitment, the Glazers will get the share price times the amount of shares they put out; the risk is on the bank. If it's a best offer scenario, they would only get the price that the market is willing to pay.
West Ham owners are a bunch of cowboys who have neither sense nor money.
Oh, God. The people of Tampa paid for 100% of the Bucs' new stadium, and then had to pay Glazer to use it?! Ridiculous.
Here in the US, it's looked upon as a privilege to have an NFL team. There's only 32 cities with teams, so tax payers are more than willing to bend over backwards to do whatever is asked of them to bring a team to the area. The idea is that jobs, tourism and the NFL's profit sharing will help offset the initial cost.
Hell, here in Baltimore, we had to promise to build a new stadium before stealing another city's (Cleveland) entire organization. Shit is cutthroat here.
lol that's not how Ashley operates. We'll never get into a bidding war. Especially not with the likes of West Ham, especially not over the likes of Andy Carroll.
I think the problem you're facing right now is Carroll doesn't want to go to West Ham, otherwise their deal would be good for you.
All I've learnt about Baltimore is from The Wire.