MarshMellow96
Member
Blame Space is still a 'junior junior member'... Where have you guys heard this?
Have we sold anyone today?
Have we sold anyone today?
Seems everyone and their dog are playing 4-3-3 now.
I remember when Benitez popularised the 4-2-3-1 with a player in the hole, and then it seemed like the perfect way to play, an un-improvable system. In reality it only worked because of how exceptional the spine of Alonso, Masch, Gerrard, and Torres were. A system really is only as good as the players who fill it.
4/7 on RVP to join United.
Bob Cass has gone all in.
Seems everyone and their dog are playing 4-3-3 now.
I remember when Benitez popularised the 4-2-3-1 with a player in the hole, and then it seemed like the perfect way to play, an un-improvable system. In reality it only worked because of how exceptional the spine of Alonso, Masch, Gerrard, and Torres were. A system really is only as good as the players who fill it.
Isco has a buyout clause of £20m.
United need to get that deal done.
Isco has a buyout clause of £20m.
United need to get that deal done.
People get far too hung up on formations. Should allow the players freedom to roam in attack, while you promote and coach defensive shape and teamwork when defending. Expand and constrict as unit.
I really think the last thing you 'need' is another winger.Isco has a buyout clause of £20m.
United need to get that deal done.
That's true, but the three in the middle gives me far more reassurance than when we play 4-2-4 at times with slowpokes Scholes and Carrick trying to protect the defence.
Like I've said before, a 4-3-3 of Fletcher/Carrick/Cleverley may not be the best around but its very well weighted in terms of skills and things the players bring to the squad. If we're playing a 4-2-3-1 now then we definitely need an Alonso or Mascherano alongside Scholes/Carrick. Such a shame Fletch is out.
I agree, that's what I was saying to Usho earlier when he insisted AVB would stick with the same 4231 that Redknapp had. A system's not really characterised by how the team's set out, but more how they react as a unit to the different aspects of the game.People get far too hung up on formations. Should allow the players freedom to roam in attack, while you promote and coach defensive shape and teamwork when defending. Expand and constrict as unit.
Where does this Isco play. Heard good things about him.
Where does this Isco play. Heard good things about him.
I hate 433.
4231 is the best but you need a striker who will score loads and a proper top class #10.
Also my go to FM formation.
You need an Alonso type player?
http://cdn.caughtoffside.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Nuri-Sahin-Fake.png[/IG][/QUOTE]
Thank god that said fake, I almost fucking ripped my labia off in fury.
Apparently Anita has refused to sign a new contract at Ajax and his arrival at Newcastle is expected by the end of the week.
Wessiej have you heard anything?
Keeper should have saved that.
Howard Nurse
My understanding is there are no imminent signings due at #MUFC. That's not to say deals aren't being worked on though. #famouslastwords
People get far too hung up on formations. Should allow the players freedom to roam in attack, while you promote and coach defensive shape and teamwork when defending. Expand and constrict as unit.
I've always wanted to know how do managers setup their teams tactically? I just can't imagine the top-level managers caring too much about formations, I always thought they just give their players instructions for when they don't have the ball and when they are in an attacking phase.
I hate it as well, it's all just teams copying what's successful, at the moment that is Barca and everyone is the 4-3-3 that they employ is the only way to play, in a few years time some other teams is going to be successful and everyone will copy their formation, a few years after that and all the teams will be back to a traditional 4-4-2 after Stoke win the league.
I always think back to WC2010 when I hear people going on about the best formation, that complete idiot Andy Townsend wouldn't shut up about how the '4-4-2' was destroying England hopes and they would be so much better in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, the fool
I want to see 4-6-0 this season.
Anyone that does it will get my vote.
A very flat 442 the type that England play IS outdated though.
It's all about finding spaces on the pitch and in a flat 442 youre not going to be doing things which makes other teams think twice.
To be honest, the formation implies what players you pick. If England play what looks like a 4-4-2 that means there's two strikers, two midfielders that will share attacking and defensive duties... whereas a 4-3-3 might mean you can get a specialist defensive midfielder in or ensure that wingers are crossing to a target man instead of feeding it to someone alongside him.
I guess it's just the players picked dictate a formation for an audience?
A very flat 442 the type that England play IS outdated though.
It's all about finding spaces on the pitch and in a flat 442 youre not going to be doing things which makes other teams think twice.
Chelsea did it in the Champions League last season
You missed out mate.
And Stoke do it all the fucking time
edit: Also, to both Viva & elsk, I must say I find your assertion incorrect. Why, because it is 4-4-2, must it be flat? As though the manager specifically tells his players "Alright, you're gonna play a 4-4-2, so what I want you to do is stay flat, don't move & avoid finding space". Why would playing in a 4-2-3-1 inherently cause players to be more able to find space, good players will find it regardless I feel. The only reason why they would specifically not find space is if the manager wanted to play a defensive game, which is what the likes of Stoke and Hodgson do. It often proves an effective tactic as well, particularly if your players are worse than the opposition.
Reports out of the Italian press suggest we have tabled at €20m bid for Llorente to Atletico Bilbao.
Juve still haven't got a striker huh? It would be a good buy I guess. 20M is A LOT though.Reports out of the Italian press suggest we have tabled at 20m bid for Llorente to Atletico Bilbao.
Edit: I do hope these rumours are true. Would save me from having to buy Llorente in career mode of FIFA
Juve still haven't got a striker huh? It would be a good buy I guess. 20M is A LOT though.
Reports out of the Italian press suggest we have tabled at 20m bid for Llorente to Atletico Bilbao.
Edit: I do hope these rumours are true. Would save me from having to buy Llorente in career mode of FIFA
Seen it too, would be a mega signing. Reports from AS say that Llorente told Bilbao he'd be leaving to join the champions from another country, I think (that's what it sounded like to me through Chrome translate). Adds credibility to the Juve link.
He wants to move to a Champions League-side.
His contract ends in 2013, yep: http://www.as.com/futbol/articulo/fernando-llorente-comunica-athletic-desea/20120807dasdasftb_21/Tes
Thanks for that, just saw the word 'Champions'.He wants to move to a Champions League-side.
His contract ends in 2013, yep: http://www.as.com/futbol/articulo/fernando-llorente-comunica-athletic-desea/20120807dasdasftb_21/Tes
I don't rate himReports out of the Italian press suggest we have tabled at €20m bid for Llorente to Atletico Bilbao.
Edit: I do hope these rumours are true. Would save me from having to buy Llorente in career mode of FIFA