Did a PG employee show you something on a plane ride or whatif it is what I just watched then you are in for a treat ;]
Did a PG employee show you something on a plane ride or whatif it is what I just watched then you are in for a treat ;]
if it is what I just watched then you are in for a treat ;]
Did a PG employee show you something on a plane ride or what
well, I have the feeling he has some connection with PG
Really? Lol. So you're saying if they dropped resolution and reduced IQ/effects they still couldn't hit 60fps.
Besides I've never said shit about games being 792p.
If you demand 60fps for a racer, demand it. Open World vs. Closed Curcuit argument is a really dumb argument. Its basically the lambasting of 3rd person, cover-based shooters, then praising a 3rd person, cover-based shooter for allowing you to tunnel underground. Or, the constant railing that CoD recieves, then hyping something like Titanfall.
Its the same genre, same resolution, same fps. The open-world (doesn't the other racer also do dynamic weather, like fog?) crutch is flimsy at best. No other racer to my knowledge has gotten a pass for being 30fps but open world. I saw 'choppy gameplay' mentioned in one case of why 30fps for a racer is bad, that its a concession on gameplay.
If 30fps is choppy to you in a closed curcuit track, its going to be choppy in an open world setting. None of those cosmetics you listed would ever relieve that.
And I have no framerate preference except 'locked'.
Lol, respect though. FH 1 was amazingPretty much. Not saying anything else, I like my job.
Sorry guys.
Pretty much. Not saying anything else, I like my job.
Sorry guys.
Pretty much. Not saying anything else, I like my job.
Sorry guys.
Hope we can see a night shot today, Never got dark enough in Horizon 1. Felt like you could easily drive around without headlights.
No, it is closed circuit. But unlike other closed circuit games the surrounding environments are dense, go on for miles and are of high quality so it is unrealistic to compare to say F5 or GT et al, and also unrealistic to compare to this. Also they delays were to work on the gameplay (read 'dynamic menu'), but they have utilised the time to improve fidelity and whatnot.I don't think anyone would argue about wanting 30fps more so than if it were 60fps but we all know the reason is because they want to push the hardware. Forza Horizon was 30fps, that's not to excuse them from not trying for 60fps but the series never put that as their main focus before. The tracks in Forza Horison 2 is also more open than the first one and allows you to go off track which we all know is more demanding on the hardware. In the case of DriveClub they set out to reach *60fps and with all the delays they still couldn't manage to hit that mark. That's not to suggest the game will run poorly but they left us thinking the delays were also linked to getting that benchmark, which they weren't able to with the graphics and effects they wanted in place. Is DriveClub going to be as open as Forza Horison 2?
http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/drive...ution_still_hopes_to_reach_it_for_launch.html
Remember, this game isn't about realism first.
Personally I appreciate the brighter nighttime.
I think my big issue with the fact that this game is 30fps is because if there was a PC release, I could easily play it at 1080/60 with no issues. But I'm forced to buy it on a weaker system and play an inferior version of what could have been had Microsoft cared about PC gamers. I'll probably still buy FH2 and like it because FH1 was incredible, arguably the best racing game of last gen - only Burnout Paradise and Dirt 2 would be in contention with it - but I really wish it was smooth as butter at 60fps.
I think my big issue with the fact that this game is 30fps is because if there was a PC release, I could easily play it at 1080/60 with no issues.
So you played the best racing game of last gen (your words) on an even weaker hardware, also at 30fps - why does it bother you that much more now? Seems weird.
If the music is that important why don't allow custom soundtracks?
If there's any way to listen to music in a car it's your own music.
No, it is closed circuit. But unlike other closed circuit games the surrounding environments are dense, go on for miles and are of high quality so it is unrealistic to compare to say F5 or GT et al, and also unrealistic to compare to this. Also they delays were to work on the gameplay (read 'dynamic menu'), but they have utilised the time to improve fidelity and whatnot.
I think their 60 fps talk was just wishful thinking and lip service I don't think they set out from the off to make it 60 fps or bust. It was never really mentioned outside of that quote - and really what game wouldn't strive for 60 fps if they could.
Pitch black nighttime is "unrealistic" anyway - see Alan Wake - perfect example of the feeling of being at night, but everything is still visible in some way. I liked the night time in FH1 as well.
IGN first videos says this game has pitch black nighttime.
http://in.ign.com/en/preview/3760/a-sunday-drive-with-forza-horizon-2-ign-first
IGN first videos says this game has pitch black nighttime.
http://in.ign.com/en/preview/3760/a-sunday-drive-with-forza-horizon-2-ign-first
Nightmare for me personally, haha.
I like this analogy. I guess 60fps is putting your points into DEX, and 30fps is putting them into Charisma?
IGN first videos says this game has pitch black nighttime.
http://in.ign.com/en/preview/3760/a-sunday-drive-with-forza-horizon-2-ign-first
hopefully we still get full moon nights too
Are you talking about the original Horizon here? Because they've only just started talking about FH2 and they didn't announce Driveclub by going hey we're going to try and be 60 fps. That came later. They said it is 30 fps but will aim to go for 60.They explained a lot of the delays were due to social features they wanted in there. Regardless of the real reasons for the delays they did mention they were striving for 60fps which is part of the reason why many still harp about it not reaching that goal. We can go on and on about what's better for open road games, closed circuit and so on but in Forza Horizon's defense the first game wasn't 60fps and they never mentioned about striving to reach that benchmark for #2. I think most people assumed it was going to be 30fps because of the past game and because it's not a closed track plus with all the other effects they put in there. The vistas on DriveClub in the background don't matter too much if they cannot be driven no matter how many miles it seems to go. Obviously Turn 10 has to manage resources for Forza (and every other developer) so that's why we haven't seen some things yet like night racing and so forth. When Gran Turismo hits the PS4 it's likely to raise the bar again as they will want 1080p and 60fps.
I think my big issue with the fact that this game is 30fps is because if there was a PC release, I could easily play it at 1080/60 with no issues. But I'm forced to buy it on a weaker system and play an inferior version of what could have been had Microsoft cared about PC gamers. I'll probably still buy FH2 and like it because FH1 was incredible, arguably the best racing game of last gen - only Burnout Paradise and Dirt 2 would be in contention with it - but I really wish it was smooth as butter at 60fps.
PG, I hope that the car vehicle audio issues have been addressed. FH1's cars were a little too soft compared to FM.
can we expect rain and fog in this game? Does FH1 has this and can we manually control?
To the people who are whining about Driveclub receiving criticism for being 30fps. This is a thread about Forza Horizon 2. Please direct your bitterness towards the developer of Driveclub, who suggested 60fps was their goal. They are responsible for setting those expectations.
PG, I hope that the car vehicle audio issues have been addressed. FH1's cars were a little too soft compared to FM.
I think my big issue with the fact that this game is 30fps is because if there was a PC release, I could easily play it at 1080/60 with no issues. But I'm forced to buy it on a weaker system and play an inferior version of what could have been had Microsoft cared about PC gamers. I'll probably still buy FH2 and like it because FH1 was incredible, arguably the best racing game of last gen - only Burnout Paradise and Dirt 2 would be in contention with it - but I really wish it was smooth as butter at 60fps.
Are you talking about the original Horizon here? Because they've only just started talking about FH2 and they didn't announce Driveclub by going hey we're going to try and be 60 fps. That came later. They said it is 30 fps but will aim to go for 60.
Those comments only came after people started moaning about the frame rate in the demos at conferences and subsequent gameplay footage.
I think it is unfair to say the Driveclub was always wanting to be a 60 fps title based on a couple of quotes given in an interview just to keep the interviewer happy and not give a negative sounding answer. And I'll say again. What game wouldn't want to be 60 fps.
All games want to try aim for that magical mark. Except that game about 1886 things being in a logical sequence.
Which was the point made lol. It was more about answering the questions you raised than fps. I'm in the don't care make it look good and play good camp which is what FH1 did and DC looks to have matched.There is really nothing more to add, I explained the reasons why some are still going on about DriveClub not hitting their own benchmark of 60fps and the delays did not help their case. The game looks excellent visually though. I also don't agree with the makers of 1886 and their bullshit pr and should just come out and say they want the prettiest graphics which is why they chose 30fps and leave it at that. No need to carry on since this is about Forza Horizon 2. Having a rock solid 30fps and not dropping is a plus but I'd still prefer 60 but we can't have everything, at least when it comes to console gaming.
PG, I hope that the car vehicle audio issues have been addressed. FH1's cars were a little too soft compared to FM.
if it is what I just watched then you are in for a treat ;]
This so much. Compared to FM4 and now FM5 - it was a huge step back.
if it is what I just watched then you are in for a treat ;]
As an older gamer (36) who has been around for almost all console generations, it always blows my mind how we get a new generation and so many people think most games are going to be 60fps.
It never happens because as the machines get more powerful, the graphics get better canceling out that power to an extent. I mean yeah sure if we were still getting 360/ps3 level graphics, textures, poly counts, etc on these machines then sure we should expect 60fps but we are not.
Plus a lot of console developers for whatever reason prefer pushing better graphics at 30fps over cut down graphics at 60fps. Its the way its always been and the way it always will be, well unless Sony and Microsoft demand 60fps with future consoles and its doubtful that will happen.
If 30fps bother some of you so much (and its not just lame fanboy wars shit) then the only thing you can really do is get a good PC and then you can have your 60fps,120fps, 87xAA and all that jazz.
No, it is closed circuit. But unlike other closed circuit games the surrounding environments are dense, go on for miles and are of high quality so it is unrealistic to compare to say F5 or GT et al, and also unrealistic to compare to this. Also they delays were to work on the gameplay (read 'dynamic menu'), but they have utilised the time to improve fidelity and whatnot.
I think their 60 fps talk was just wishful thinking and lip service I don't think they set out from the off to make it 60 fps or bust. It was never really mentioned outside of that quote - and really what game wouldn't strive for 60 fps if they could.