Thats such a pathetic response to selling off someone elses prototype intellectual property
LMAO
For like $500
Incredible how stupid they are. They're RICH. Why are you sacrificing credibility for $500.
i'm taking Linus side, not a fan of GamerNexus videos at all tbh
i'm taking Linus side, not a fan of GamerNexus videos at all tbh
I guess if the hole becomes deep enough the GPU's he keeps dropping will never hit the floor :|Linus just keeps digging into his own hole.
That response to the Billet situation is very unethical.
I'm starting to think he is not just a moron, but an actual asshole.
No one cares if you're not a fan or have a personal vendetta against Steve.i'm taking Linus side, not a fan of GamerNexus videos at all tbh
LTT forums are down . Probably LTT shut them down because most people even in their own forums were calling them out
No one cares if you're not a fan or have a personal vendetta against Steve.
Now that's the kind of snark I'm all in for!But then how can i suck Linus' cock? I want to be clear, he threw a startup under the bus and expressively mentioned many times that they take shortcuts because it costs money to be accurate, and then goes holier than thou versus Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed, but I'm willing to let that slide, under the carpet, because I WANT TO SUCK LINUS' COCK!
/s but accurate for Linus shills
Delta Airlines: Good news, We have misplaced your luggage and sent it to an unknown entity. You will never get it back. You're welcome.
LMAO
If you produce 20 shitty videos a week, that's $10k a week/$40K a month.For like $500
Incredible how stupid they are. They're RICH. Why are you sacrificing credibility for $500.
I often wonder why people lie when it is so easy to verify. Did Linus really think his trust me bro response would work? That no one would follow up with the aggrieved party? Boggles the mind.
If you produce 20 shitty videos a week, that's $10k a week/$40K a month.
I mean the clear solution is to produce fewer and better videos but that's not what he wants. And in his "as much crap as humanly possible" model, he doesn't want to spend above costs.
Bleah, shit channel, shit person.
Indeed. He made that Billet Labs video knowing full well that their water block wasn't going to work properly on a 4090. An ethical person would have stopped the shoot, found the 3090ti that Billet sent with their block (LMG staff losing the 3090ti was bush league), and done the testing properly. But that would cost him a couple hundred dollars, so better to potentially ruin a start-up than mess up his content factory's timeline.That response to the Billet situation is very unethical.
I'm starting to think he is not just a moron, but an actual asshole.
The Billet Labs stuff was disgusting.
Absolute scumbag.
What a clown
How do you know he wasn't properly trained, what if he was? You're missing the fact that this guy could have ignored everything he was trained to do or he could have pretended to be a level-headed person up until this point.He was actively trying to be offensive, the only time this would be okay is if his company authorized him to publicly do that while representing them. If your actions are seen as a public offense by your employer, that is more than fertile grounds for termination. By your metric companies should not have the ability to fire someone for getting a DUI, most companies do not train you to drive sober, it's something you personally handle and understand could affect your employment if you choose that path. Your whole argument is that he wasn't explicitly told or trained not to talk crap on camera, and furthermore believe his job should be safe because of it, no way. Another point, firing someone in this situation is not retaliation, it's risk aversion.Companies dump and dunk one on another all the time like Coke and Pepsi, MacDonalds and Burger King the rules change from place to place as it should.
I'm sorry but not such a thing as "bad etiquette" happened in this incident, each business have their own set of rules and those rules should be presented to the employees during the onboarding process and also reinforced through training through the employees lifecycle at the company.
What the guy said was pretty mild and normal, and although we can argue that it was of bad taste that type of behavior would not seem as "wrong" or "offensive" at the day to day setting, a manager job is not to fire people, if a manager fires a employee that's a gigantic red flag and sign of incompetence as the company spent money in the hiring process to make sure it would filter bad fits... If the problem was not the hiring then it was the training... If it was not the training then it was the fact that the company's managers don't actively work on reinforce the company's values or at least PR train their employees that are going to be on the fucking spotlight with a camera and mic.
Any respectful company should fire a manager with ideas like yours on the spot, because the person is not only trying to retaliate against an employee that made a mistake (which MUST HAVE BEEN EASILY PREVENTED by properly training and instruction), the person is clearly incompetent by not doing their own job properly(guide/lead) in addition to also acting against the company interest of spending resources diligently.
Billet Labs made a Reddit post:
Billet Labs made a Reddit post:
The unprofessional behavior is just appalling. If you’re being given a prototype hardware to review (especially some niche experimental hardware from a tiny 2-person startup), anybody with an ounce of integrity would:Indeed. He made that Billet Labs video knowing full well that their water block wasn't going to work properly on a 4090. An ethical person would have stopped the shoot, found the 3090ti that Billet sent with their block (LMG staff losing the 3090ti was bush league), and done the testing properly. But that would cost him a couple hundred dollars, so better to potentially ruin a start-up than mess up his content factory's timeline.
Pretty much asshole behavior throughout the entire ordeal. Sounds like LMG needs to replace their Chief Vision Officer with someone that is trustworthy.
What are you trying to say, that GN is doing all this to profit?
And both can not be true?What are you trying to say, that GN is doing all this to profit?
Billet Labs themselves are posting online and agreeing with GN. Plus if you've been watching LTT for a while, everything GN says about the quality issues and conflict of interest are 100% true.
If that's really what you get out of Gamers Nexus, I think Cocomelon is a better fit for you, much less brain power required to understand anything.
GN is legit as fuck, probably the most detailed testing on any computer hardware on the internet. Anyone arguing Steve has an agenda to push on anything is a fucking moron, full stop. His entire channel is as neutral as it gets.
What are you trying to say, that GN is doing all this to profit?
Billet Labs themselves are posting online and agreeing with GN. Plus if you've been watching LTT for a while, everything GN says about the quality issues and conflict of interest are 100% true.
He got called out in the first place...And both can not be true?
His employees looked really tired in that video, did LMG upload that? Why would they do that in the first place? lol.
If you want to produce more content you need to just hire more people and not overwork the ones you already have so your quality doesn't decline, if not you should slow down and take good care of your work, but both approaches harm the bottom line.
Regarding billet labs:
- Receives product for free for a review
- Fails to use product as intended in said review, bashes the product
- Gets backlash for using the product wrongly and producing inaccurate data
- Doubles down on his podcast saying he's not gonna spend money making a correction video (the product is someone's life's work btw)
- Goes on to say that NOBODY should buy the stupid product anyway and that he won't spend more time on it. (Imagine this was your work and you sent it in because you follow or admire the guy, must be heartbreaking)
- Startup asks for their product to be shipped back
- Sure bro we'll send it
- when?
- Next week
- Few weeks pass, Hey bro we kinda auctioned your product for charity so we are not sending it back but GOOD NEWS! At least it isn't sitting in a shelve!
- 'That was our only prototype and it cost us "x" amount of $ to produce and R&D
- Ok
- Whole thing blows up, Linus said they agreed to compensate Billet labs
- Billet labs comes out saying they never asked LMG for X for compensation.
How do you fuck something up this bad?
But whilst I'm here, a $600 monoblock isn't an egregious waste of money, a $250 backpack which falls apart isAll subjective. Trust me bro.
i'm just say this what a massive douche Linus is, the way he treats work ethic, his employees, the companies that trust him, the public, the lies.
He become another asshole multimillionaire detached from reality, selfish prick
To save everyone unneccesarily wasted time, I will not rechew many of the valid arguments made by others. I will however point out that this entire drama could've been prevented if you were- not only honest- but not take GN's video personal to the point you have to skew perceptions or flat-out lie to us in order to save your (company's) skin.
Lying about BL's compensation and your weak attempts to gaslight not only GN but a part of your community for 'raising pitchforks' shows your inability to take responsibility and further highlights the hypocrisy this company has dissolved to. Just a recent example; You pointed out that viewers using adblock are pirates in your eyes. Meanwhile you have no issue in covering products containing emulated/stolen content.
You stated several times in the past that you care deeply about the content your channel produces, yet fail to listen to your employees when they ask for more time between videos, leading to a huge part of today's fallout to start with.
Furthermore, your ego makes you unable to adapt to changing situations and has caused this particular issue to spiral out of your control. No WAN show, no re-review, no more lies can fix the damage you've caused your own company. I can't speak for others, but I sure have lost faith in your integrity as a figure head but as a person aswel and I am confident others have aswel. There is only one solution, and that is to come clean and not only publicly apologise to your own community for lying in this matter, but also to GN and to BL for trying to sweep this under the rug and deflect your own shortcomings upon them.
I hope you take this criticism at heart and learn from it.
Whilst I agree that the focus should be on the side of, well, the core issue: quality & lack of checking/testing pipeline. The fact the focus is on Billet so much is that it shows a kind of "out of touch way", the whole video + WAN response. Where even Luke, to his credit, said "wouldn't it be better to test x, y and z in a proper way"?
What the Billet case tells us is
1. Input to Linus is very difficult, he ignores it, even from Luke. Saddens me.
2. Profit over quality. Whilst there's a balance to be struck, if you showcase a product, then either just don't do it, or do it properly. Don't treat a manufacturer like that. It treats the whole "review"-industry the wrong way.
3. The communication flow inside the company is bad. Billet wanted it back, Adam wanted more quality. Did Adam know it had to be sent back? How did it end up on an auction? And what it highlights most is that Linus's response to Steve is "you have my number, my e-mail, address it in private" clearly doesn't work it seems... No, because, Billet tried that. And still had their prototype on an auction.
Dude what are you talking about with all those hypotheticals? STOP.How do you know he wasn't properly trained, what if he was? You're missing the fact that this guy could have ignored everything he was trained to do or he could have pretended to be a level-headed person up until this point.He was actively trying to be offensive, the only time this would be okay is if his company authorized him to publicly do that while representing them. If your actions are seen as a public offense by your employer, that is more than fertile grounds for termination. By your metric companies should not have the ability to fire someone for getting a DUI, most companies do not train you to drive sober, it's something you personally handle and understand could affect your employment if you choose that path. Your whole argument is that he wasn't explicitly told or trained not to talk crap on camera, and furthermore believe his job should be safe because of it, no way. Another point, firing someone in this situation is not retaliation, it's risk aversion.