I can't find a list of title updates. What did they do to the retro and/or gnasher?the Retro is now nearly useless after the update as I found out last night where Gnasher usage was at an all time high.
I can't find a list of title updates. What did they do to the retro and/or gnasher?the Retro is now nearly useless after the update as I found out last night where Gnasher usage was at an all time high.
I can't find a list of title updates. What did they do to the retro and/or gnasher?
Most major changes like the title updates are announced and detailed via blog posts on Epic's Community site but the truth is they don't always mention ALL the tinkering they do to the game on that site. If you want to be 100% certain of what's going on with the game you need to follow a couple key developers on Twitter like @quinndelhoyo and @PeteNub.Isn't there an Epic blog that shows the dl changes? Something similar to what DICE does with BF3?
I think people are making shit up.
The only things I know have been changed since vanilla is the hammer burst damage over distance got a buff, the flame nades got a buff, and the sawed off got a range reduction.
I don't believe the gnasher or the retro got messed with at all.
I'd like to see an official list of changes myself.
Me too. But I agree with the "think people are making shit up", since title updates are not used for weapon balancing.
I think people are making shit up.
The only things I know have been changed since vanilla is the hammer burst damage over distance got a buff, the flame nades got a buff, and the sawed off got a range reduction.
I don't believe the gnasher or the retro got messed with at all.
I'd like to see an official list of changes myself.
Does it really matter? You'll notice if you have a shit connection or not. If you knew you were on servers, would you continue playing just because of that, even if you couldn't kill anyone with less than 2 clips?
Don't bother tweeting Cliff, I doubt he gives a shit about Gears 3 anymore.
Tweet Petenub instead who's in charge of the playlists. https://twitter.com/#!/PeteNub
I dunno. I'm the last one to ever complain about the Gnasher, but recent games have elicited some strange Gnasher behaviour, i.e. getting gib'd 3-4 body-lengths away; something that ludicrous had honestly never happened to me in the 600 or so games I'd played pre-update.
I am absolutely positive. A friend of mine does NOT have the map packs yet and we played regular TDM all night Saturday. When you start matchmaking a message comes up, something to the effect of, not all players have the maps, you will only get to play P2P matches, etc, etc.
On another note: how is it easy to tell when you (or someone else) has host? I've guessed before based upon connection, shotgun power, my lag vs player etc, but am not aware of a sure fire way to tell who is host.
Sounds more like lag to me. But, again, this is easy to check. Just fire up a private match with two controllers (opposite teams, no bots) and verify if this is the case.
Sounds more like lag to me. But, again, this is easy to check. Just fire up a private match with two controllers (opposite teams, no bots) and verify if this is the case.
One way to test lag is shoot your shotgun in a game and look at your ammo counter, there will be a delay between your shotgun going off and your ammo count going down by 1 each time.
You're probably right. Either way, these "wtf moments" seldom happen and I figure that I'm probably as much on the giving end as the receiving, so it all cancels out.
JUST FIX THE GODDAMN MAPS ISSUE!
When I said who is in charge of shit, I meant keeping this game from dieing. Fucking up the DLC with no playlist etc is bone-headed. People paid money, and the rarely come up in regular rotation. I believe every other Gears game, and game for that matter has always had a DLC playlist.
Also, the rumor or at least what people on the epic forums are asking for is a beast dlc pack. If DLC 4 is centered around Beast, that would be trash. Unless they made some awesome all around maps, and through in a new Locust maybe. But I haven't even touched Beast yet, and from what I've heard it's no horde. It's fun maybe once or twice and you're done with it.
If you want the new maps play ranked.
Retro got nerfed? Bullshit I still get downed with that shit in a second
Complete cop-out. Not all of us want to put ourselves through the L337 pacings of ranked matches; in fact, given the numbers, most of us don't want to. I'm annoyed enough at the amount of AR'd Hammerbursting/Lancering in TDM quick matches.
We just need a fucking playlist. SURELY that's not hard to implement.
I never said the Retro got nerfed, but the Gnasher got a buff for hard aiming
So you're not happy with any solution other than the one you want.
I'd rather play all the maps than the same 4 or 8 over and over.
IMO a stranded playlist is more important/needed than a fenix rising map pack.
Prove it.
You've already shown you have a youtube channel. Show us this is true.
Go play the game man, I have nothing to prove to you on an internet forum or in a game. Why don't you prove the scorcher got buffed since you said it in the forums yourself??? So you can say something got buffed because "you" the almighty think so but I can't? No thanks bro, you're just not worth the time, I have better things to do than argue with a negative jerk. Thanks.
So you're not happy with any solution other than the one you want.
I'd rather play all the maps than the same 4 or 8 over and over.
IMO a stranded playlist is more important/needed than a fenix rising map pack.
No, I'm not happy, because my solution is objectively the better of the two; not to mention, it's a solution that isn't hard at all to implement and one that should have been implemented from conception for the greater good of the game.
$15 fucking Australian dollars I paid for these maps and you're telling me to suck it up and play the game in a ridiculously restrictive way. That just doesn't cut it, dude.
Ranked is "ridiculously restrictive" compared to quickmatch? Really?
It's enough to warrant complaint. I shouldn't have to play the game in a certain way to reap the benefit of maps that exist - for all intents and purposes - to be played across every game type. It's unreasonable. I wouldn't be complaing if the maps weren't that elusive. It's terrible.
How is playing ranked TDM different than quickmatch TDM? It's the same game type. You're not playing a different game mode.
The only difference is the time between matches and a new lobby at the end. There's nothing "ridiculously restrictive" about it.
That said, the map order in quick match does need work (it's needed work since the beginning), but THAT is what you should be pushing for IMO, not a 5 map rotation playlist.
Somehow I get a feeling this game plays out very different in Australia than in the U.S.
Is the population (game) that small over there?
Keep posting then, these posts of yours are really constructive.
Wow.
My bullets < your bullets.
A guy just sprinted at me across checkout, I was shooting him the whole time with a lancer. No down. nothing.
3 Gnasher blasts at close range. nothing. He turns around and shoots me once at the same range, gibbed.
Just bad gameplay balance.
*Sigh* Remember when Epic made GOOD competitive multiplayer? On I long for the days of UT.
Sure, it's the same game type, but it's a different beast, is it not? Higher skill level, clans in abundance, bottom-line tactics... It's all a bit heavy for me (I'm going on assumption here, as I've never played Ranked).
No matter how well a game's gameplay is designed/balanced it will never be able to make a laggy encounter like that fair.
I understand the frustration but it's misplaced.
Where would one vent their frustrations with a game, other than the community thread for that game?
All games have these issues; against its peers, GoW3 is actually pretty excellent.
Sure, it's the same game type, but it's a different beast, is it not? Higher skill level, clans in abundance, bottom-line tactics... It's all a bit heavy for me (I'm going on assumption here, as I've never played Ranked).
Also, the numbers are half, if not a third of what you'll find in QM TDM.
Anyway, that's not the point. It's still a restriction. It really doesn't matter how small a restriction it is; the point is that it exists and it restricts.
And that IS what I'm pushing for, ultimately, but Epic haven't really shown any competence in fixing that issue.
Look, I'll deal with it, but considering just how much the ends will justify the means, they should really get on top of their shit.
Took a month off, came back, and am getting absolutely fucked.
This is gonna make me sound like a bitch, but is matchmaking in this game broken??
What an earth are players with 2.6 k/d ratios and ranks of 140 doing playing against level 72s with 1.1 k/d ratios?? lol
Teams just seem so unbalanced and people are playing games with people that they shouldn't be playing against. Im average at best, maybe below average, why am I playing against people that are SIGNIFICANTLY better than me. Isn't that the point of matchmaking, to stop this from happening?
I know a large part of it is me being rusty, and the fact that I always play with randoms, but the matchmaking def seems broken as well. Maybe its because there's never more than 2000 people playing in my region?
Def getting some lag too, as in warping across the map - not often, but more than before
Haha. I am convinced this game doesnt utilize match making. Im level 63 with no reup do to hardly playing and I was always in games with Teams with wings on opposing team. Personally I wish they got rid of the whole number system.