Not really.
Or at all.
Please enlighten me then.
Not really.
Or at all.
Please enlighten me then.
So this isn't about the interpretation of Get Out but rather GitS?For one, one movie has a minority person losing their culture/identity, experiencing it, the other is a dumb action flick where the entire minority person is missing.
For one, one movie has a minority person losing their culture/identity, experiencing it, the other is a dumb action flick where the entire minority person is missing.
So this isn't about the interpretation of Get Out but rather GitS?
A good chunk of GitS does talk about identity and the importance of memories. The villain is driven by trying to reclaim his lost identity. I mean come on.
Ok? Yea I agree it would be a very different movie but both films have similar themes in their script. It's just one is vastly better at it and delves into it deeper and for a much larger period.Yeah and that's what it is, talk. Get Out would be a vastly different movie if it was just a white dude talking about black people losing their culture and identity.
Yes we're comparing the two because we're talking about where the movie falls short and for what reasons.I mean we're seriously comparing Get Out to fucking Scarlett Johansson GITS!? Lol maybe let's get Avatar: The Last Airbender and Dragonball in here too.
Ok? Yea I agree it would be a very different movie but both films have similar themes in their script. It's just one is vastly better at it and delves into it deeper and for a much larger period.
Well it's not just totally at the end however as the movie brings it up earlier with the trashguy and the villain is driven throughout the movie for that same reason. It is in the film for a good while before the twist.One is a central theme. The other is something appended at the end to deal with the creator's guilt.
I wonder if the director or writer has come out and explained what they were thinking. I assume evil corporations stealing brains and whatnot is fine, but if they really thought that this would make the anime fans happy by having some version of Motoko in the movie... they probably could have made the same point without making it just stick out as something a bit tone death by just making the original brain someone completely original.
While fans and prominent Asian-American actresses cited the casting as yet another example of Hollywood whitewashing, one man involved in the project is singing a different tune: producer Steven Paul, who told BuzzFeed he thinks the movie actually wont disappoint anyone.
I think everybody is going to end up being really happy with it, Paul said in an interview published Wednesday. Theyre going to be very, very happy with it when they see what weve actually done with it, and I dont think anybodys going to be disappointed.
Well it's not just totally at the end however as the movie brings it up earlier with the trashguy and the villain is driven throughout the movie for that same reason. It is in the film for a good while before the twist.
Oh my god, people are actually trying to suggest GITS is tackling the same social commentary as Get Out lol wow.
Ok and that seems fine if you're talking about why one movie works and the other doesn't. How does a movie tackle similar material isn't some reaching type of criticism. Comparing the failings of one movie to the success of another isn't some bizarre form of analysis.That doesn't change anything.
It's like comparing Moonlight to the Adam Sandler opus I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry.
Is it people, or is it one really really confused person?
Ok and that seems fine if you're talking about why one movie works and the other doesn't. How does a movie tackle similar material isn't some reaching type of criticism. Comparing the failings of one movie to the success of another isn't some bizarre form of analysis.
Well it obviously isn't talking about the roles of black males or minorities in a white society. No shit at that. However Ghost in the Shell as a franchise is about the loss of identity and this movie in line with the franchise does talk about that. Multiple characters had their identities wiped and it serves as the driving force in the movie, which is a very GitS concept.GITS doesn't fail at "tackling" that material because it never had any intention to tackle that material. Its goals were much, much lower than that.
I've posted this link before, but yeah, they basically thought it was clever.
Also, just for funsies. Here's a clip of Scarlett Johansson saying " I would never attempt to play a person of a different race" just days before the movie released.
Well it obviously isn't talking about the roles of black males or minorities in a white society. No shit at that. However Ghost in the Shell as a franchise is about the loss of identity and this movie in line with the franchise does talk about that. Multiple characters had their identities wiped and it serves as the driving force in the movie, which is a very GitS concept.
One is about existentialism and the other is about gentrification so I guess there is difference in the consequences and motives.
What? Kuze is driven by his loss identity, the garbage guy had his previous memories wiped.Franchise sure. The movie? No.
What? Kuze is driven by his loss identity, the garbage guy had his previous memories wiped.
They straight up took concepts from the original anime and SAC. They fucking lifted this shit from the anime. At this point you're saying the anime isn't about loss of identity because they stole entire plot points from multiple incarnations.
What? Kuze is driven by his loss identity, the garbage guy had his previous memories wiped.
They straight up took concepts from the original anime and SAC. They fucking lifted this shit from the anime. At this point you're saying the anime isn't about loss of identity because they stole entire plot points from multiple incarnations.
Saying they didn't handle it well and saying they weren't trying to at all is two separate things.
The film doesn't do anything with the revelation that she used to be Japanese. She could've been a white person named Jill Smith in her past life and it would've had the exact same effect.
I suppose the audience is supposed to think it's extra fucked up that they changed her race, but the Major doesn't seem particularly affected by it.
One of the two main villains and the main character are chasing after their loss identity. The movie spends a sizable chunk of its runtime on that. The film brings up the notion of how important memories are. None of this is new ground for the franchise and it's largely lifted from prior entries. The writers were trying to go for a similar theme as the original, hell the original ending for this film is again lifted from the '95 version.If you can't understand that movies can have segments that touch on certain themes but the movie not actually being about those themes then there's not really much to argue here.
Like I said, their casting choices said a hell of a lot more about identity and culture loss than that movie could ever say.
I dunno, felt the twist was a neat nod to fans of the franchise who weren't overly angry about the casting of a series that didn't have asian looking anime characters to begin with. /shrug
I wish there was some kind of witty comic shorthand I could just copy and paste over and over anytime someone brings up "anime characters don't look asian."
Animated Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent have small eyes and jet black hair. Simpsons have yellow skin.
Also, just for funsies. Here's a clip of Scarlett Johansson saying " I would never attempt to play a person of a different race" just days before the movie released.
His racial identity or his identity in general? Because there is a difference.What? Kuze is driven by his loss identity, the garbage guy had his previous memories wiped.
They straight up took concepts from the original anime and SAC. They fucking lifted this shit from the anime. At this point you're saying the anime isn't about loss of identity because they stole entire plot points from multiple incarnations.
Saying they didn't handle it well and saying they weren't trying to at all is two separate things.
Anime characters are generally supposed to be Japanese. Foreigners are drawn very differently, even Koreans are drawn in a different style. It would be too restrictive on a character designer if they had to make a person match certain characteristics.
There are exceptions but they're exceptions.
I loved it. My fiancee​ loved it. It's very very true to the anime and very well made. I really don't give a shit about the Major being white, they had to get as big a western recognized lead they could to have a chance at convincing the general pop to see it. As big fans of the anime, we thought it was fuckin great despite that reality. She's a minority and thinks the race issue is completely overblown. I would agree and see it as just the typical way people try their hardest to find any reason to hate Hollywood remakes, but I'm white so I must be racist.
I was referring to his overall identity.His racial identity or his identity in general? Because there is a difference.
Most foreigners aren't drawn differently in anime and manga.
That is mostly only the case to show the audience that they are foreigners because it is somehow important.
Only watch the first film. The sequels aren't really good films. Fuck Andy Lau.
On topic, I'm not even surprised anymore. And people say it's the BEST anime to film adaption. Like it means anything.
Most foreigners aren't drawn differently in anime and manga.
That is mostly only the case to show the audience that they are foreigners because it is somehow important.
All of them. Put forth a debate that isn't pathetic whataboutism and then we'll talk.
I dunno, felt the twist was a neat nod to fans of the franchise who weren't overly angry about the casting of a series that didn't have asian looking anime characters to begin with. /shrug
Is this really the hill you want to die on? Is it really?
As for the theme of identity and memories, yea GitS does have moments of that. But does it utilize it as a message? Does it really have anything remarkable to say about oppression and racial genocide? Now I haven't seen the film, but I'm guessing it doesn't delve any deeper than 'corporation=bad', or really come close to the ramifications of losing one's whole identity. With a different writer, it could! Just not this movie
You'd be wrong. The film is entirely about identity. It doesn't even really explicitly say a corporation is bad. There's a bad guy from a corporation but that wasn't the message at all here.
It's laughable that people are posting this quote. Have you seen the film?
At no point does ScarJo ever take on the role of a Japanese woman. She plays the Major, a machine who identifies herself as Mira Killian.
They literally kill two Asian people and put them in the bodies of white people.Looking at this supposed whitewashing is superficial, particularly if you haven't seen it yet.
Can only imagine how worse it would have been with out scarjo
They literally kill two Asian people and put them in the bodies of white people.