• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ghost in the Shell's ending spurs new accusations of even worse whitewashing

Status
Not open for further replies.
This was my reaction when I saw the twist

b44529bf46f32276998f23b0e63ea3b2.png
 

hirokazu

Member
it's interesting how people find a movie to be fine when only the visuals are good(which I actually disagree with, I think they completely missed the mark).
It seems to have gotten away with lot of the Fresh reviews on RT because of the visuals, which I really liked as well. Which is fine by me, you can judge a movie on the sum of its parts. I just think on the sum of its parts, this film was still not very good.
 
That's stupid.
a35.jpg

This must be the most American girl you've ever laid your eyes on in Anime, right?

Toooo American! Also as a side note, Asia is home to most of the people on the planet with wide diverse backgrounds and ethnicities. It's a pet peeve when people assume Asia is only Japan and China
 
Yea also, with L being black, is that considered black washing and white washing as they're both supposed to be Asian? With GiTS was there any mention of the city being in Japan? I don't remember.
Is L supposed to be Asian? I thought he was from England but I can't recall whether his ethnicity was mentioned.
 
Here's the thing though, you're correct, but in the minds of some these film executives, star power is still very much a thing. Several of them are in a bubble, so of course this casting decision made sense to them, meanwhile the filmmakers are the ones who are gonna take most of the heat for this fuckery. And the decision clearly blew up in their faces, because the film ain't doing so hot at the box office.

I'd bet if the director made the film how he really wanted, it would have been so much better.

Correct. It exists in the minds of studio executives. We don't have to kow-tow to it like it's real though and the more audiences literally point out it's not, the better things will be.

But who would they have chosen? I can't think of a really solid Japanese American actress out there for the role right now. It would be a "career maker" for someone. And good luck getting that project funding with a cast of people with little Star Power. If you've ever seen me in these threads before you know I'm nearly always on your guys side of the argument. I constantly ask for new talent to be given a chance because everyone starts somewhere and Hollywood is brimming with unexplored talent and frankly I'm bored of seeing the same actors all the time. But I understand at least generally how these things shake out in terms of securing funding. Internationally and beyond. It's a problem of misconceptions I agree. But it's the one that people who have money share and that's what matters when it comes down to getting funding.

I probably would've goner with Tao Okamoto myself. She is imposing and has a real presence that I think would've worked well for the Major.

If you're willing to stretch to half-Japanese, there's Reiko Aylesworth.


And there's a whole big ass list if you're willing to stretch to Chinese or Korean-American.
 

Trago

Member
it's interesting how people find a movie to be fine when only the visuals are good(which I actually disagree with, I think they completely missed the mark).

Admittedly, I'm an absolute sucker for anything employing the Cyberpunk aesthetic, so when I say they nailed the visuals, I really mean they NAILED it. We hardly see big budget cyberpunk in Hollywood ever.

I'm also really looking forward to Blade Runner 2049 as well.
I think we can all agree that it will probably be a bitter film than this :p
 

TDLink

Member
Also, this may be a stupid question but I'm assuming there is a huge outrage in Japan over this right?
No they don't care. Oshii himself said he likes Scarlet in the role.

This is an American thing entirely, and it's legitimate. Asian actors just aren't seen as being able to carry a film for some reason.

The ironic thing is this movie probably has more Asian representation than any other major Hollywood blockbuster in recent memory.

I'm extremely surprised Beat Takeshi was so prominent and spoke entirely Japanese.
 

Trokil

Banned
Usually it's in the eyes. The bigger the eyes are drawn, the more western the characters look to me.

294733.jpg


Kanuka Clancy. She is American, born in Hawaii from Patlabor

200px-James_After.jpg


James Black from Detective Conan

latest


German Dieter Müller from Captain Tsubasa
 

kmax

Member
It's disgusting to me that they never went with with Asian actors to begin with.

It's amazing that they went that direction, given everything that's been going around surrounding this film. It's horrific that fine actors that faithfully could portray the characters in the film aren't given the chance because of racist, cultural undercurrents. To slap people in the face in the manner that they did though is just reprehensible.

"I would never try to play a person of a different race, obviously."

Scarlett Johansson.

https://twitter.com/GMA/status/846705727750135809
 

WetWaffle

Member
It's hard to know what people are thinking when they just reply like this, but I honesty don't think my opinion is even controversial. I feel like I'm just stating the obvious.

How is it obvious? Western people aren't the only ones with big eyes, Asians can have them too. What makes you think Asians, in their own companies, in their own media, make western characters as their protagonists. Do you want them to give all their characters narrow eyes so you don't assume the anime is about you? If you're really having trouble, just look at the name of the character, sheesh.
 
It's hard to know what people are thinking when they just reply like this, but I honesty don't think my opinion is even controversial. I feel like I'm just stating the obvious.

It's not controversial. It's just nonsensical. Anime characters are drawn like anime characters. Outside of skin color for black folks, you usually can't look at them and immediately tell what race they are. It's just a style. You look at characters drawn predominantly by Asian creators in Asian cities with Asian names and think "white". It's stupid. They're not white just because you looked at them and assumed so because white is the "default".
 
I'd love to see an analysis talking about how Get Out uses sci-fi to address race & appropriation so expertly while Ghost in the Shell completely fails doing the same.

Easy. One uses a black protagonist as the face of black victimization and the other uses a white protagonist as the face of Asian victimization.

Also one movie actually cares about the message it's delivering and delivers it with guts and integrity. GitS uses its message as a thinly veiled cover up for a business decision.
 
Why is that interesting? It seems odd to not expect anyone to go, "hey that's kinda rude." In hopes the person might edit their post politely for the next guy. Mentioning it exists doesn't inspire someone to go back a few pages to find it.

There's a difference between this:

Shouldnt spoil other films in this thread!
Sooooo, not only have my worst fears/totally realistic expectations for this movie been confirmed but, thanks to a couple of people being completely useless at spoiler tags I've been spoiled on a different movie that I actually wanted to watch.

And these, which reference a potential spoiler directly.

Well,
Get Out
is now spoiled for me.

Same. Maybe resist the urge to make comparisons if it's also one of the big reveals in that movie?

Doing the first two does not call attention to it directly and perpetuate it. Note, I had to spoiler tag both of the second posts.

This is even beyond the fact that those who have issue with spoilers... generally don't know if they're actually spoilers. We literally have had this happen in multiple threads where either someone speculates or makes something up completely and we have a long derail about spoilers that aren't spoilers.

You best bet, if you have a problem with a spoiler, is to do what someone did here, which was PM a mod. That's literally how I joined the thread.
 

TDLink

Member
Correct. It exists in the minds of studio executives. We don't have to kow-tow to it like it's real though and the more audiences literally point out it's not, the better things will be.
I think it's wrong to say star power doesn't exist at all or no longer has an impact even if it's diminished. Lucy did as well as it did because of Scarlet, I'm sure that partially factored into this casting.

The Rock is huge now and his involvement in Fast Five basically elevated that franchise to the level it's at today. I garuntee a random movie like Baywatch is going to do decently based purely on him.

The Marvel movies with Robert Downey Jr do make more money than the ones without him. That's why it's a big deal he's in the new spiderman too.

A bad movie is still usually going to perform poorly but a big star is going to increase interest whether it's good or bad.
 

hirokazu

Member
It's hard to know what people are thinking when they just reply like this, but I honesty don't think my opinion is even controversial. I feel like I'm just stating the obvious.
This comes up a lot when people discuss anime and default ethnicity. Basically, the default characters aren't designed to look Western, that's just the default look Japanese self-identify with in anime.

When anime is brought to western countries, a lot of people then self-identify with those characters because they have big eyes, and, well Asian people aren't supposed to have big eyes, right?

I think it's somewhat insulting and possibly racist in itself, but I won't force you to change your perspective on this.
 

SkyOdin

Member
It's hard to know what people are thinking when they just reply like this, but I honesty don't think my opinion is even controversial. I feel like I'm just stating the obvious.
You are also incredibly wrong. The problem is that you are looking at a face with pale skin that lacks any stereotypical ethnic features. You see that and call that "white", because you subconciously see white people as the default.

In Japan, they see themselves as the default. Instead, white people are given stereotypical features. Usually, these include blond hair, large noses, and stocky or muscular builds. In contrast, small eyes are used in Japanese animation strictly as a stereotype for Chinese people.
 

Hallowed

Member
How is it obvious? Western people aren't the only ones with big eyes, Asians can have them too. What makes you think Asians, in their own companies, in their own media, make western characters as their protagonists. Do you want them to give all their characters narrow eyes so you don't assume the anime is about you? If you're really having trouble, just look at the name of the character, sheesh.

Asians can have them yes, but Japanese typically have slimmer eyes than westerners, that's just stating the obvious. These are race traits.

And I didn't say Asians wanted to make western characters as their protagonists, I simply said that the characters they draw look more western to me than Japanese. It has nothing to do with what they are named, but purely on how they look.

Assume the anime is about me? Just in case if you think I'm white - I'm not.
 
No they don't care. Oshii himself said he likes Scarlet in the role.

This is an American thing entirely, and it's legitimate. Asian actors just aren't seen as being able to carry a film for some reason.

The ironic thing is this movie probably has more Asian representation than any other major Hollywood blockbuster in recent memory.

I'm extremely surprised Beat Takeshi was so prominent and spoke entirely Japanese.

He's probably just being polite...
 
had no idea of the anime, no idea of the whitewashing, i went to see this today to see scarJo with no clothes on

am i a bad person guiz
 

- J - D -

Member
It's hard to know what people are thinking when they just reply like this, but I honesty don't think my opinion is even controversial. I feel like I'm just stating the obvious.

I think this is a discussion for another place, but I will say that the one thing that's obvious about this kind of discussion is that you probably shouldn't even touch it with a ten foot pole if the way you approach it is "I'm just stating the obvious".
 

DVCY201

Member
I think it's wrong to say star power doesn't exist at all or no longer has an impact even if it's diminished. Lucy did as well as it did because of Scarlet, I'm sure that partially factored into this casting.

The Rock is huge now and his involvement in Fast Five basically elevated that franchise to the level it's at today. I garuntee a random movie like Baywatch is going to do decently based purely on him.

The Marvel movies with Robert Downey Jr do make more money than the ones without him. That's why it's a big deal he's in the new spiderman too.

A bad movie is still usually going to perform poorly but a big star is going to increase interest whether it's good or bad.

Wasn't Iron Man single-handedly responsible for bringing Robert Downey Jr back? So, the movie made him...

I'd address the other movies, but I haven't seen them
 
had no idea of the anime, no idea of the whitewashing, i went to see this today to see scarJo with no clothes on

am i a bad person guiz

There are two other GitS threads to post in if you don't want to talk about the politics of it. If you're here to play up being a victim for liking the movie, find somewhere else. No one here is judging anyone for liking the movie.
 

jett

D-Member
Best one is still Speed Racer and I'm fully aware that it's not a best movie in the world by a long shot but people want to give Ghost a pass cause its insanely visually pretty which I credit more to the original (and the VFX studios) than the live action movie.

You don't get a pass in my opinion for just copy and paste the original imagery

Speed Racer is the best. It also didn't make the dumb mistake of being set in Japan.

Other an apparently shitty script, Ghost in the Shell's problems begin by setting it in a non-descript Asian city, just like the 1995 movie. Should've been an entirely American/Western adaptation. This is like The Departed taking place in Hong Kong, but still starring Leo DiCaprio, while everyone else remains Chinese.

If you're going to adapt an Asian property for western audiences, you need to go all the way. This half-assed whitewashed way of doing things is pointless.
 

Ridley327

Member
Correct. It exists in the minds of studio executives. We don't have to kow-tow to it like it's real though and the more audiences literally point out it's not, the better things will be.



I probably would've goner with Tao Okamoto myself. She is imposing and has a real presence that I think would've worked well for the Major.


If you're willing to stretch to half-Japanese, there's Reiko Aylesworth.



And there's a whole big ass list if you're willing to stretch to Chinese or Korean-American.

Good call on Okamoto, who already left a pretty big impression in The Wolverine and has a role in John Woo's next film, which is said to be his big return to the gritty modern action films that he made his name on.
 

Izuna

Banned
That's where I'm at. It's clear when they looked at the anime they saw a white female in the major.

Which frankly isn't exactly surprising.

latest


Most people in the U.S who also watched the anime probably watched the dubbed variation leading to that being even more ingrained.

I do agree it was a route that was already likely laid out during the early stages. But I still think they tested at least the concept with test groups. We will never know though. I wish film, TV and games were more transparent. Huge improvements could be made. Or at least people would have a better understanding of why choices were made and then we'd be able to properly address issues.

I have never thought Motoko was meant to be white, even as a kid.

I did think Ryu from the animated movie was, though, haha. I legit thought he was a white dude who grew up in Japan, and that was why they were calling him Japanese.

Regardless, I don't see what this has to do with it. Any adult, especially in the creation of this movie, would obviously know better
 
I just realized that I unintentionally spoiled
Get Out
. I'm sorry to anyone affected :(

Asians can have them yes, but Japanese typically have slimmer eyes than westerners, that's just stating the obvious. These are race traits.

And I didn't say Asians wanted to make western characters as their protagonists, I simply said that the characters they draw look more western to me than Japanese. It has nothing to do with what they are named, but purely on how they look.

Assume the anime is about me? Just in case if you think I'm white - I'm not.

Being white or not doesn't really mean anything. I've had black friends argue with me up and down that anime characters that obviously aren't white, are. Why? Because white is the default for a lot of us. This was a huge deal when Hunger Games hit movie screens. Rue was a black character (and was described as such in a single line in the book), but people who'd read the book and missed that line were shocked to find out she was actually black. Why? Because, having missed that line, their minds immediately painted Rue as a white character. You see this among all races of people.
 

Izuna

Banned
I just realized that I unintentionally spoiled
Get Out
. I'm sorry to anyone affected :(



Being white or not doesn't really mean anything. I've had black friends argue with me up and down that anime characters that obviously aren't white, are. Why? Because white is the default for a lot of us. This was a huge deal when Hunger Games hit movie screens. Rue was a black character (and was described as such in a single line in the book), but people who'd read the book and missed that line were shocked to find out she was actually black. Why? Because, having missed that line, their minds immediately painted Rue as a white character. You see this among all races of people.

The reaction to the Hunger Games stuff was less of a surprise, and more outright racism.
 

WetWaffle

Member
Asians can have them yes, but Japanese typically have slimmer eyes than westerners, that's just stating the obvious. These are race traits.

And I didn't say Asians wanted to make western characters as their protagonists, I simply said that the characters they draw look more western to me than Japanese. It has nothing to do with what they are named, but purely on how they look.

Assume the anime is about me? Just in case if you think I'm white - I'm not.
SkyOdin said it better than I was going to. White characters have a specific look in anime.
 

Moonkid

Member
Doing the first two does not call attention to it directly and perpetuate it. Note, I had to spoiler tag both of the second posts.

This is even beyond the fact that those who have issue with spoilers... generally don't know if they're actually spoilers. We literally have had this happen in multiple threads where either someone speculates or makes something up completely and we have a long derail about spoilers that aren't spoilers.

You best bet, if you have a problem with a spoiler, is to do what someone did here, which was PM a mod. That's literally how I joined the thread.
Yeah my bad, will do so in the future.
 

Replicant

Member
The revelation did make me feel a bit uncomfortable. It's just weird all around. I get that they want to say something meta about identity erasure but I'm not sure this is the film to do it.

I think the problem is that they clearly want to tap into that rich Japanese setting but wanting to cast Scarlet in the main role.

I think if they wanted to adapt it like this (casting a white actress), they should have gone for a general western futuristic setting and just change everything and not even use Ghost in the Shell name except for reference as in "Based on Ghost in the Shell" but call the film something else like Cruise's latest film.
 

Zero315

Banned
I think it's wrong to say star power doesn't exist at all or no longer has an impact even if it's diminished. Lucy did as well as it did because of Scarlet, I'm sure that partially factored into this casting.

The Rock is huge now and his involvement in Fast Five basically elevated that franchise to the level it's at today. I garuntee a random movie like Baywatch is going to do decently based purely on him.

The Marvel movies with Robert Downey Jr do make more money than the ones without him. That's why it's a big deal he's in the new spiderman too.

A bad movie is still usually going to perform poorly but a big star is going to increase interest whether it's good or bad.

The course correcting the series did with Fast Five is what elevated that series, not Dwayne Johnson. Fast & Furious made 155 Million and Fast Five made 209 million.

Robert Downey Jr. was a huge risk when the company first brought him in due to his past substance abuse and being hard to work with due to it. The movies elevated him, not the other way around and that elevation hasn't transfered to anything else he's done. People go for Iron Man/Tony Stark, not RDJ.
 

navii

My fantasy is that my girlfriend was actually a young high school girl.
If you think about it, putting a brain in a body of
a different race of the being whose memories they are trying to suppress
makes a bit of narrative sense.

To me it's this. But I haven't seen this movie just read the spoiler tags in this thread.
I think of the movies I've seen when somebody sees a face and memories come flooding back. So if you don't want that to happen you make sure its a face they wouldn't recognise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom