I find it weird that people can't comprehend certain people having intense attachments to their pets. And creating a dozen hypotheticals to determine where they draw the line seems futile.
Going to quote this poster because I think their point is very succinct.
Going to quote this poster because I think their point is very succinct.
That's not hat interesting a quandary actually. Of course one would save their own child over their own dog. You'd hope.
The point of people saying they value their dog over a stranger's child is understandable even if you don't agree.
I'm not a dog owner, but I get it. It's a member of the family. I get that feeling. I just hope that if there's a fire and someone's dog and my kid were trapped inside, that a rescuer would prioritise my kid over the dog, owner included. But you know, everyone has their own priority.
These kinds of discussions are futile though. Because beliefs are beliefs. People would like to argue rationality and logic behind their reasoning, but sometimes there isn't one, and that's ok.
I mean, would you prioritise your kid over someone else's? Of course. Would you prioritise your kid over someone else's YOUNGER kid? Over yourself? the list goes on and on, and everyone will have a different response to each one. Who is right? No-one. Everyone. you couldn't say, really.