If by any chance the greek would've voted yes then the government would have some cover when austerity further wreck the economy.What was the point of that referendum exactly?
In this world?The EU is indeed highly undemocratic but in what crazy world should a national limited refenderum have any impact on all other countries?
In a system where you obviously can get in, but never get out.The EU is indeed highly undemocratic but in what crazy world should a national limited refenderum have any impact on all other countries?
If by any chance the greek would've voted yes then the government would have some cover when austerity further wreck the economy.
Living beyond their means and all that.In a system where you obviously can get in, but never get out.
And it's nice nothing has happened to Gold-Sachs for helping in hiding the debt.
Yippie.
Or the utter failure of the Euro watchdogs.
Nope, all the fault of the common Greek man.
What a tool. New governments have to follow through on agreements.
If that was really Tsipras' intention, then he would not have rallied so hard for 'No'.
The final figure of which looks like 0, given the latest news.I think he rallied hard for the no vote to get leverage in negotiations. He may have overestimated that amount of leverage it gave though.
Not even remotely true. They should, however, be willing to face the consequences of not following through on agreements.
The funny part about this is that Greece has put more money into the ESM that Finland.The True Finns have started trolling in earnest: Finland will not accept bridge funding for Greece.
I'm currently looking for articles that explain why Greece's politicians seemingly always wait until it's too late to act. Handing in their proposals at the very last minute, leaving it open if they're going to pay at the end of the month, looking for a quick solution when banks are already running out of money and not beforehand and so on. I'm not sure if you know what I mean but there must be an explanation for that.
The EU is indeed highly undemocratic but in what crazy world should a national limited refenderum have any impact on all other countries?
The funny part about this is that Greece has put more money into the ESM that Finland.
If by any chance the greek would've voted yes then the government would have some cover when austerity further wreck the economy.
In this world?
Democratic countries make decisions that impact other countries all the fucking time.
The True Finns have started trolling in earnest: Finland will not accept bridge funding for Greece.
France, EU constitution.Show me a referendum that forced 18 other states to do something without that the population in those countries weren given the same rights. And how they could sell it as democratic.
So keeping your word is trolling now?
The fact that they voted no on the referendum obviously means it is not at all costs. It is their governments that are complete tools.I wonder how many can kicks it'll take for the Greek people to realize that staying in the Eurozone 'at all costs' isn't the solution.
What colour do you expect its underside to be?Although the real punchline will come when he turns his coat.
France, EU constitution.
What colour do you expect its underside to be?
I wonder how many can kicks it'll take for the Greek people to realize that staying in the Eurozone 'at all costs' isn't the solution.
The EU amended the agreement in accordance to the wishes of the French people.Is that a countetargument? The EU constitution is a prime example how an European or several other countries can't force something on another country.
A referendum in Germany is not binding for Greece or Spain or Great Britain or any other country that isn't Germany.
What do you mean "force them to do something"?Show me a referendum that forced 18 other states to do something without that the population in those countries weren given the same rights. And how they could sell it as democratic.
That's probably precisely why they wanted him out.Varoufakis was the only one with any sort of spine, that much is clear now. He should've stayed.
They made a few changes to the contents, but the biggest one was to convert the document from a constitutional treaty into a simple one (what ended up as the Lisbon Treaty), thereby sidestepping the need for a new referendum on its adoption. And the consitutional treaty is a special case, since its enactment required unanimous approval via referendum in all member states (they sort of stopped trying to do this with other treaties after its resounding failure).The EU amended the agreement in accordance to the wishes of the French people.
What do you mean "force them to do something"?
The greek voted on what Greece will do, specifically about whether or not they accept the bailout terms.
Yes, decisions made by countries often impact other countries, but that's not really unusual.
It doesn't need to have binding power outside of Greece, it talks about what Greece does, not other countries.The post string is pretty clear. The referendum in Greece a national limited poll and it doesn't have any binding power outside of Greece.
Claiming the EU isn't democratic because it didn't follow the referendum is nonsense.
The referendum was sold as a means of getting a better deal without a grexit; which wasn't possible. Not a grexit.It doesn't need to have binding power outside of Greece, it talks about what Greece does, not other countries.
Or do you think that Greece must accept any bailout offer with whatever terms that is put forward by the ECB?
Because that would indeed be undemocratic.
Because that's what the official information is.
What does "as soon as possible" mean exactly? You said it's a fire sale, I don't think that's true.
Because that's what the official information is.
What does "as soon as possible" mean exactly? You said it's a fire sale, I don't think that's true.
In afraid you don't understand the Greek banks’ situation. As soon as possible for them means "yesterday". That's how bad it is. If they linked bank recapitalisation to this fund, the fund needs to be created now. Now meaning as soon as they can put it in place technically.
I explained you twice why it's a fire sale, even if it would to be done in 2-3 years, which it most probably won't.
Your only argument is that there is no clear deadline in the press releases. You don't need a clear deadline when you have a clear conditionality linked to it.
It doesn't need to have binding power outside of Greece, it talks about what Greece does, not other countries.
Or do you think that Greece must accept any bailout offer with whatever terms that is put forward by the ECB?
Because that would indeed be undemocratic.
No one has ever said that defaulting would be easy. Then again, good luck finding a country in recent history outside zimbabwe that defaulted and is as up shit creek as Greece is right now, let alone where it'll be one to two years from now.
He's doing quite a bit more than that. Dude openly stated that yes, they had the plan, and no, tsipras never had the balls to support it.
Thank you for aptly demonstrating and reinforcing the reasons why i utterly loathe the Europhile.
As I have stated on a similar occasion, it's called the definition of insanity.Do the same thing, under the same conditions, expect a different result. WTF?
Lol nationalising a bank in order to save it is even more expensive. Who will pay? You know the answer.You can nationalize the banks and send the fuckers that gambled the system and fucked up to jail, m8.
I feel like the Greeks really want to change things this time, I hope they'll get through these tough times.
But I can not and will never forget how Germany acted in the last 24 hours. Without France this would've ended in a disaster for all of Europe because of them. Rebuilding "trust" will take a lot of time.
Tsipras will not be in power, and hopefully won't be drawing breath either when talks about the debt arrive ie after the first review.