Is this really necessary?
Just as necessary as all 343i's excuses so far the "we are so SO sorry FORGIVE US!" when they had all this time to test the game or even release a Beta.
Fuck yes it's necessary when my best friend got me an Xbone as a gift with a copy of Halo only to have this thing broken for two weeks and I can't even play with him online.
All the disappointments and failed damage control is intoxicating.
Be cool about it all the power to you man, but don't insinuate this is okay and all will be fixed when all is broken.
Meanwhile, behold, another ViDoc from 343i about Halo 5 beta and how awesome and a privilege it is to work on it is gonna be released for the beta in the next two weeks.
"is this really necessary?" is why companies release BROKEN. ASS. GAMES cause they know the backlash will be Meh, this behavior in the industry is wrong and 343i BUYING TIME with a patch ETA is horrible, copies will still get sold and people will still get disappointed, the patch will release and there will be a shit ton of things wrong with the game.
IGN's review was a disgrace, they spent almost all of the time of the review mentioning how broken the MP is, the lifeblood of Halo, and they still end up stamping it a 9,even after the score they mention the broken Multiplayer. If your product has half the components BROKEN, what kind of message you're sending giving it an almost perfect score.
I want what I paid for (my friend paid for) to WORK, does that make me entitled that I want my game to work on release? Does it make me impatient and it's my fault that I didn't restart my MM search every 5 minutes with a glimmer of hope that this should do it? If so, this generation is even worse than I thought expecting to pay for a working product and that I'm a jerk for expecting my games to work on release.
Because hey, "these things are a norm now on release".