Trent Strong said:
That lecture is bullshit. This guy is trying to sell books. If you burn more calories than you eat you will lose weight. Burning more calories than you eat, and yet somehow gaining weight, would violate the laws of physics.
Really? Because I eat fructose everyday and I'm not dead. (I also have been the same weight for 15 years, even though I eat HFCS in nearly every meal.)
And there's plenty of smokers that didn't get cancer. You're not proving anything with anecdotal evidence. If you response to an argument that is "caloriesIn-caloriesOut does cause fat gain under certain circumstances, but doesn't explain cause" is "you're violating physics by saying caloriesIn-CaloriesOut doesn't matter" then I really don't have anything else to say to you. That's a logical fallacy from the get go.
You can call Taubes stuff bullshit if you provide scientific evidence that insulin is not the fat storage hormone, that leptin is not the appetite hormone. You'll probably selectively ignore half of what I say again, and post some tabloid media science article that makes a bunch of assumptions with no data to back it up.
Fructose increases fasting triglycerides:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17158419
Fructose induced hypertension (it's not the salt, but society won't get this for years...i mean really meat has been cured with tons of salt for ages, why would it suddenly cause problems now?):
http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v74/n4/abs/ki2008184a.html
Cutting carbs more effective than calories at practical weight loss in insulin resistant women:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100619173919.htm
Fructose causes fat cells to enlarge/mature faster in children
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100621091203.htm
Weight loss associated with reduction of insulin:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17335828
Bacteria in the gut control appetite:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100304142232.htm
Here's a study that muses the idea of the first law of thermodynamic being broken, when really simply saying caloriesIn-CaloriesOut violates the 2nd law:
http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/9
Ketogenic (very low carb) diet vastly improves blood lipid profile:
http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/reprint/132/7/1879
So what is your response to this? Are these studies stuff made up by researchers? Does it not matter because you personally have not experienced the results of these tests?