Always Cho, always.
Always Cho, always.
There seems to be a lot more spells in arena now. Isn't that one of the changes they made?I'd rather play Cho in constructed where people actually have spells in their decks.
Yeah, it's an interesting combination, but I choose not to run it because it doesn't help against the decks Jade Druid REALLY struggles with. Or at least that was the case before Giant decks. I really hope they just nerf those, though...they're far above and beyond anything else in the game right now.I was gonna say, all you need for the combo to work is either that, or having a Spreading Plague so you can atleast protect yourself against a huge board like the pic you posted.
Eh, in that interview a designer said they don't think of Druid as a class with strong draw (wut). I think UI might get hit as well. I agree Jades probably won't get hit hard or at all.I suspect they're most likely just going to can Innervate, since I don't think they care about Jades as much when they're going to be in for one more expansion, and there's already a tech card against them.
Now that Druids have astonishing card draw and can easily come back from a lost board, that kind of mana manipulation lets them get too far ahead.
A lot of people are arguing that Hunter does this deck best. You use Stitched Tracker to make sure you get Naga Sea Witch on curve.Giants druid is way too consistent.
Change naga sea witch to a hunter card. Let them have this.
Holy shit standard sucks, and it's not druids.
It's losing to Priest draws.
Barnes on 4? RIP
Raza and Shadowreaper by 8? RIP.
seeing Priests twice as often as druids, and losing twice as much to Priests.
I'd play Wild but every game is turn 5 one million 8/8s.
Nerfs are gonna make the game worse.
Doesn't help that all the streamers are getting in on the naga giant action. Yesterday reynad did it and today Day9's doing it.
He's not wrong on the time investment > skill part given that a baseline level of competency and a deck with a good enough winrate should eventually get you to legend given enough time.Today Reynad took credit for inventing the deck, lol. "I can't wait until a month from now when everyone says the combo was obvious."
He also said ranks don't represent skill, the majority of legend players have as much skill as a brand new player stuck at rank 18, and that the only thing important in Hearthstone is time investment.
That's not really provocative though. A grindy ladder system doesn't make any sense as a mechanism for judging "skill" in a TCG.Reynad likes to say provocative things like that.
He's not wrong on the time investment > skill part given that a baseline level of competency and a deck with a good enough winrate should eventually get you to legend given enough time.
That's not really provocative though. A grindy ladder system doesn't make any sense as a mechanism for judging "skill" in a TCG.
He is saying the brand new player at rank 18 is as good as the rank legend player. He knows this isn't true.
Good summary.Holy shit standard sucks, and it's not druids.
It's losing to Priest draws.
Barnes on 4? RIP
Raza and Shadowreaper by 8? RIP.
seeing Priests twice as often as druids, and losing twice as much to Priests.
I'd play Wild but every game is turn 5 one million 8/8s.
Nerfs are gonna make the game worse.
Remember when they nerfed quest rogue and then Jade druid took over? Well, goodbye druid hello Priests.
The ladder system in HS really sucks for the type of game HS is and completely over-rewards time investment relative to other factors.Seeing a guy like Reynad spouting that skill doesn't matter in the slightest in Hearthstone is gross. There's a reason some guys hit legend every season and some guys never see single digit ranks and it's not all down to time investment.
Not to mention he knows he didn't pioneer the Naga / Giants interaction but he was quick to take credit for it, saying "what a coincidence" that the top post on r/competitivehs is about the deck.
Except that top post is a guy who grinded that deck to rank one legend on the wild ladder. Hard to do if Reynad invented the deck yesterday.
Holy shit standard sucks, and it's not druids.
It's losing to Priest draws.
Barnes on 4? RIP
Raza and Shadowreaper by 8? RIP.
seeing Priests twice as often as druids, and losing twice as much to Priests.
I'd play Wild but every game is turn 5 one million 8/8s.
Nerfs are gonna make the game worse.
Remember when they nerfed quest rogue and then Jade druid took over? Well, goodbye druid hello Priests.
It's likely that he played the deck off stream before playing it on stream. I obviously don't know. I heard about the deck a couple days ago.
edit:
friday
He was rank 25 0 stars in wild when he started his stream yesterday.
He took credit for inventing the deck today.
Other regions? Specific deck list? I dunno the info here.
Other games like MTG and Poker regularly have large open tournaments where top players consistently do well!
HS does not have this. It has a grindy ladder system that primarily rewards you w/ a "Legend" rank based on a combination of time investment and a baseline skill level. It's easier for a bot to hit Legend because a bot doesn't have to worry about eating, sleeping, working etc. - it's just a bot!
Today Reynad took credit for inventing the deck, lol. "I can't wait until a month from now when everyone says the combo was obvious."
He also said ranks don't represent skill, the majority of legend players have as much skill as a brand new player stuck at rank 18, and that the only thing important in Hearthstone is time investment.
Weird. Until nerf I'll be using druid and pirate warrior. After nerf, we'll see.. mage maybe.I think right now there is an inflated Priest population because everyone is anticipating the Druid hammer. People are moving away from it and trying for something different. The meta is still trying to tech against Druids which allows Priest to flourish.
The ladder system in HS really sucks for the type of game HS is and completely over-rewards time investment relative to other factors.
Yes, he's being deliberately provocative, its Reynad. Underlying point is valid.
Holy shit standard sucks, and it's not druids.
It's losing to Priest draws.
Barnes on 4? RIP
Raza and Shadowreaper by 8? RIP.
seeing Priests twice as often as druids, and losing twice as much to Priests.
I'd play Wild but every game is turn 5 one million 8/8s.
Nerfs are gonna make the game worse.
Remember when they nerfed quest rogue and then Jade druid took over? Well, goodbye druid hello Priests.
BRB making a Giants Handlock deck and then claim that I "invented it".
Look at this genius level deck building yo!
I made this deck as a joke and I took it to Wild ladder.Sad thing is it is pretty genius compared to the garbage most people put in their decks.
But yeah, there's enough players out there that someone out there did "invent" a Giant version of every class the minute the interaction was discovered. I don't know how you give credit to deck builders when everything is so iterative around mostly obvious possible archetypes. Like 2/3rds of every deck is immediately obvious from the moment you hear the name, even if you've never thought of that archetype before, like Secret C'thun Paladin.
I made this deck as a joke and I took it to Wild ladder.
I won 3 games in a row on turn 6-7.....
This interaction is hella busted. I am honestly thinking of putting Enhanco Mechano in this deck just to scumbag a Windfury Giant out for the win.
There are services who do this. Of course you have to give your account to them and it's hella illegal but these services do exist (ie. you pay them and they get you to Legend).I should get a bot or hire a teenager to get me to legend just for the card back heheh 😎✨
it's not illegal, breaking the terms of service is just that. You're voiding a contract that will have a hard time to hold up in court, if it comes to that.There are services who do this. Of course you have to give your account to them and it's hella illegal but these services do exist (ie. you pay them and they get you to Legend).