The problem is, you'd think any speech she gives was reviewed by her. But nope, that's not how assembly line politicians do things.
I'd assume any speech she gives has people reviewing it, nobody caught this?
No, no it doesn't. Stop projecting.
How did you come to that conclusion?She fucked up in saying it, but she obviously doesn't actually believe it, so meh.
It was an interview.
Igoring the fact that it was an interview, no, politicians do not review all the speeches they get during a campaign, "assembly line" or not. They are constantly speaking, interviewing and traveling, with barely enough time to sleep, let alone do much else. I feel like you just wanted a chance to get mad at an "establishment" canidate.
For the general sure, but it's bad during a primary where she's constantly being attacked for not being liberal enough.I bet you she doesn't. The alternatives are people who actively campaign on overturning Obergefell.
Much like the vast majority of voters, most interest groups are pragmatists. Slamming Clinton doesn't help you in the long run. It gets taken care of privately.
So is everyone losing their minds over this?
Personally I was alive during all of this and it was pathetic how the Reagan Administration dealt with the AIDS crisis.
Hillary is even older than me. There is zero excuse for this mistake. She's apoligized and that's fine but this was an easy one to avoid.
The problem is, you'd think any speech she gives was reviewed by her. But nope, that's not how assembly line politicians do things.
For the general sure, but it's bad during a primary where she's constantly being attacked for not being liberal enough.
Hillary: "Good morning, everyone. My name is Barack Obama, and as American's first African-American president, I would like to encourage more black men -- like myself -- to aspire to achieve anything!"
*hours later*
Hillary: "I misspoke about my name, race, sex, and who I am. For that, I am sorry."
She fucked up in saying it, but she obviously doesn't actually believe it, so meh.
Hillary: "Good morning, everyone. My name is Barack Obama, and as American's first African-American president, I would like to encourage more black men -- like myself -- to aspire to achieve anything!"
*hours later*
Hillary: "I misspoke about my name, race, sex, and who I am. For that, I am sorry."
Not sure how a person who was alive during the creation of the mirror could make the mistake of thinking she was a black man but I'm glad she quickly apologized.
Again, I don't get this line of thinking. What "research" do you need to do? This is well known stuff, especially in politics. NOT knowing about it is even more damning considering her shaky LGBT history. It's like somebody asking about 9/11 and saying, "yes, it was terrible, the west coast was in shambles." Should've done the research!!If she didn't believe in it, why would she say it? It came across her desk, she vouched/okay'd it. She should've done the research before just belting it out.
Cursory knowledge of her decades-long history on the national stage?
If she didn't believe in it, why would she say it? It came across her desk, she vouched/okay'd it. She should've done the research before just belting it out.
Hillary: "Good morning, everyone. My name is Barack Obama, and as American's first African-American president, I would like to encourage more black men -- like myself -- to aspire to achieve anything!"
*hours later*
Hillary: "I misspoke about my name, race, sex, and who I am. For that, I am sorry."
I'm not so sure on that. I think she could legitimately believe that in the context of the 1980s, the Reagan Administration breaking down after year of ignoring it and finally acknowledging AIDS was a somehow "brave" or "noble" thing. I can see that being the sort of thing a politician of the early 90s who had to convince themselves that Reagan was actually ok would convince themself of, and maybe wouldn't be aware that people have reinterpreted that history a bit in the last few years. Same way she repeated the old Southern myths about how Jim Crow was mostly because of how bad and corrupt Reconstruction was. The sort of thing that you'd never be taught today, but that 20-30 years ago was sort of unquestioned conventional wisdom outside of a few serious historians.
So, there's a thread posted 8 hours ago:
Pastor introducing Ted Cruz: gays should be killed, not afraid of prison
So, there's a thread posted 8 hours ago:
Pastor introducing Ted Cruz: gays should be killed, not afraid of prison
That thread is 3 pages long now. This thread was posted less than 20 minutes ago, is now at page 6. I'm not american, but I really baffled by this. There are post literally saying that it would be better for a president to lie to you instead of saying "I'll try not to".
When the republican party candidates are Trump, Cruz or Rubio and you say you wont vote for Hillary or Bernie over things like this, I feel America really deserves the republican candidates.
So, there's a thread posted 8 hours ago:
Pastor introducing Ted Cruz: gays should be killed, not afraid of prison
That thread is 3 pages long now. This thread was posted less than 20 minutes ago, is now at page 6. I'm not american, but I really baffled by this. There are post literally saying that it would be better for a president to lie to you instead of saying "I'll try not to".
When the republican party candidates are Trump, Cruz or Rubio and you say you wont vote for Hillary or Bernie over things like this, I feel America really deserves the republican candidates.
So, there's a thread posted 8 hours ago:
Pastor introducing Ted Cruz: gays should be killed, not afraid of prison
That thread is 3 pages long now. This thread was posted less than 20 minutes ago, is now at page 6. I'm not american, but I really baffled by this. There are post literally saying that it would be better for a president to lie to you instead of saying "I'll try not to".
When the republican party candidates are Trump, Cruz or Rubio and you say you wont vote for Hillary or Bernie over things like this, I feel America really deserves the republican candidates.
Everyone should watch the documentary How To Survive a Plague (on netflix) for some history of the real heroes that made a difference during the AIDS epidemic in the 80's/90's, not whatever bullshit Hillary was spouting(which she thankfully apologized for)
Republicans being Republican isn't news, Democrats being Republican is.So, there's a thread posted 8 hours ago:
Pastor introducing Ted Cruz: gays should be killed, not afraid of prison
That thread is 3 pages long now. This thread was posted less than 20 minutes ago, is now at page 6. I'm not american, but I really baffled by this. There are post literally saying that it would be better for a president to lie to you instead of saying "I'll try not to".
When the republican party candidates are Trump, Cruz or Rubio and you say you wont vote for Hillary or Bernie over things like this, I feel America really deserves the republican candidates.
She was stuck in a spot where she had to say something positive about the Reagans that wouldn't simultaneously piss off democrats. She obviously failed in the latter by saying something so demonstrably false, so you may be right in that she had managed to convince herself that the Reagan administration's AIDS record was something other than what it was.
We expect better from Clinton.This is surprising, crazy, wild shit. The Ted Cruz thread, not so much.
its also up for free on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFgrosyVWrY&t=652s
Is this meme now?
I keep reading this.
Wtf is this bullshit? She pushed for LGBT rights as SOSFrankly speaking im not surprised Hillary would say something like this. Glad she at least apologized? But given her record im not shocked.
Her political career didn't begin at SOSWtf is this bullshit? She pushed for LGBT rights as SOS
Yeah not like they fucked over someone who was their friend cause he had aids (Rock Hudson). Heartless cunts.
What'd they do to Hudson?
Of course, but she supports LGBT rights now and pushed for them globally. To hold her to a different standard than Obama or other Democrats who didn't support LGBT rights initially seems sexist tbh.Her political career didn't begin at SOS
Wtf is this bullshit? She pushed for LGBT rights as SOS
And this is how the thread goes from discussing a fairly horrendous mistake on Clinton's part to arguing bullshit like your factually inaccurate and extremely dishonest characterization of her political history.At this point we should just stop pretending that Hillary isn't actually a Republican.
The choices this election cycle are Hillary (R), Trump (I), and Bernie (D).
She had just gotten done talking a lot about the Reagans' work with alzheimer's and other things. She could have just stopped, but she had another point she wanted to make...She was stuck in a spot where she had to say something positive about the Reagans that wouldn't simultaneously piss off democrats. She obviously failed in the latter by saying something so demonstrably false, so you may be right in that she had managed to convince herself that the Reagan administration's AIDS record was something other than what it was.