Money can certainly change people, but I'm betting he's wondering how far he could have taken the company himself without FB.
Besides, during the first few rounds of investing he'd already made a TON of cash, but still supported a fully open VR ecosystem.
Heck, even after he sold the company to FB he still seemed to really believe that they wouldn't be a "walled garden" or be buying exclusives.
Most of all I think the fact that he's stopped talking to the "masses" is the biggest sign he's no longer in control.
Oh well, just goes to show you shouldn't expect to sign with the devil and get a good deal.
He might be wondering, but that sort of wondering stings a lot less when you have lots of money regardless.
As for the not being in control, that much is certain and has been for some time. He's not even the CEO. The lack of his talking could be a result of him being disillusioned with everything. Of course, it's just as likely - if not more, that it's a result of the company putting a PR leash on him so he doesn't say anything else that's high on ideals. Something they'd have to walk back on. Preemptive damage control.
except I know zero casuals who would ever invest if people like me recommend against it due to the high barrier to entry.
I think a more likely scenario that evolves is casuals will see consoles as the place for full game experiences and mobile for casual experiences and the fragmentation of the whole pc platform due to all this shitty behaviour leaves it as the experimental indie platform ..left to die
High barrier to entry now. This gen doesn't matter on that timescale. If they can keep their current user base complacent with exclusives and then use Facebook muscle to push a more mainstream friendly set later on... Mission accomplished.
Also, gaming is just one subset of the VR market. Arguably one of the smaller potential ones. Particularly from the Facebook perspective. They don't need to be the best at gaming. Just the best
overall to the general public.