I'm quite confused about overclocking (or rather the results and this intel boost stuff I've never dealt with before)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8227/devils-canyon-review-intel-core-i7-4790k-and-i5-4690k/2 says i5 4690k's default auto voltage should be 1.121v, but mine autos to 1.034v
I used prime 95 yesterday at stock and (with the boost clock at 3.9ghz) my temps would go up to 49-52 degrees in hwinfo and stabilise at that.
Now at the same exact voltage with a 4ghz base clock (but it doesn't seem to use turboboost at all anymore now, is that normal? I thought it would attempt to boost higher) so basically a 100mhz increase over the old boost clock (and again at the same voltage) my temps went up to 60-67 on each core (before evening out at 55-62 ish eventually).
What's with the large temp increase at the same voltage and basically the same clockspeed?
Additional things:
My bios seems to default my ram (ddr3 rated at 1600mhz) to 1333mhz, should I set it to 1600?
What prog should I use to monitor fanspeed? (I can't find it in hwinfo maybe i'm just blind)
What on earth is the XMP extreme memory profile setting?
Anyhow I guess I'll run at 4ghz for a few days (and so some more stress testing ) before I start upping voltage and clocking higher (I'd like to get a 4.4ghz clockspeed without having to up voltage too much so I can keep the pc quiet) or messing with the ram speed.
Just confused as hell by these temps (though they are also still way lower than the stock temps reported in that anandtech review, probably because of the much lower default voltage)
@ the lower voltage of my cpu vs the review, is there a new stepping for the 4690k or something or do I just have a particularly good sample (that apparently only needs 1V at 3.5ghz, probably less since it seems more than happy with 1.04 at 4ghz.