Novum_Veritas
Member
Windows 10
I see, do you have different partitions?
Or different hard drives installed?
If C: is only on one harddrive you only need to reformat the C: drive and reinstall Windows.
Windows 10
980 Ti AMP is 369 for Prime members on AmazonDE right now
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B011DY6LAY/
I see, do you have different partitions?
Or different hard drives installed?
If C: is only on one harddrive you only need to reformat the C: drive and reinstall Windows.
I have two hard drives. One is an SSD with Windows on it. The other is a 7200rpm hard drive with mostly games from steam.
Okay, just re-format the SSD then, just power off the 2nd HDD with your data on it.
Should go smoothly with the Windows 10 installer.
Have you bought Windows 10 or you did the upgrade from WIndows 7 / 8 to Windows 10?
I bought it. Thanks for the help. Just something I might do in the future, but not yet.
I bought the 750gb SSD on Amazon because I'm a sucker.
A Samsung one?
There is no 750gb Samsung SSD on prime deals. It's the newer Crucial MX300.
Ah yeah, I see that one for 140 on AmazonDE now too. Hrm.I bought the 750gb SSD on Amazon because I'm a sucker.
There is no 750gb Samsung SSD on prime deals. It's the newer Crucial MX300.
spend a little more and get the bigger SSD.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00M8ABHVQ/ref=twister_B00MW5YM8M?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
Will an SSD improve game performance ( not including loading times)?
Will an SSD improve game performance ( not including loading times)?
Could I also add this to my current system, which already has a HDD and SSD, and could I just copy and paste my steam folder with all its content to it?
Which 1440p monitor is currently best to get right now with G-Sync enabled?
Asus PG279Q Or Acer Predator XB271HU
PG279Q and XB271HU uses the same panel, but people say the QA on Acer's is better.The quality of the panels themselves is going to be nearly identical. So what it really comes down to is the feature set and refresh rate. The difference between 144/165 to put it frankly is not noticeable. So I would just go with whichever you can get a better deal on. They are both amazing monitors.
Also check out the Acer XB270HU which is the earlier gen of the 271 but virtually identical aside from the additional 21hz and design.
Hey guys.
I've upgraded to a 6700k/Hero VIII over my FX8350/990 R2.0 combo and now some games are crashing a lot. Windows has been reinstalled.
Dark Souls 3 is the main one. I've put 50 hours into it on the old specs and it never crashed once. Crashed at least 10 times on the new specs with DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_RESET messages. FFXIV has done it once and one or two other games have done it. It's a very hard crash that takes about 5 minutes to recover from.
I thought it was my MSI Afterburner OC at first but I restarted my PC, had afterburner completely off and Dark Souls 3 still crashed with the above message. It's not an instant crash. It could do it after 2 mins or 60 mins.
Updated my 980ti drivers and that didn't help either.
Any ideas guys? Upgrading specs was supposed to be a good thing but so far it's only been a negative for me.
PG279Q and XB271HU uses the same panel, but people say the QA on Acer's is better.
The difference between XB271HU and XB270HU is larger than you described. They use different panels and different G-Sync modules. And XB271HU has HDMI input.
PG279Q = XB271HU, 270HU uses an older panel.The PG279Q, Asus MG279Q and Acer XB270HU all use the same panel. So going by what you said the XB271HU does as well, then you say it doesn't?
Anyway in actual usage they are nearly idenrical panels across the board. I'm not sure about the Gsync differences though, what changes between the 270 to 271?
HDMI I guess is nice if they have a console or something.
PG279Q = XB271HU, 270HU uses an older panel.
The input part changed, AFAIK past G-Sync monitors don't support anything other than DP.
From the review you linked.http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/asus_rog_swift_pg279q.htm
Both the PG279Q and MG279Q use the 8bit panel that the XB270HU uses. Only the XB271HU uses a 10bit panel I guess.
This is a new panel that we've not seen in any screen before. Early reports and some other reviews have wrongly stated that the screen is using the same M270DAN02.3 panel as the similarly spec'd Acer XB270HU and Asus MG279Q. That isn't right though, and isn't really logical given that this is a new borderless / frameless style panel as well. We expect to see this new panel used in the forthcoming Acer XB271HU when that's released too.
From the review you linked.
I need to build a pair of very low budget PCs for friends - Browser machines, no more.
Is the smartest CPU choice still a i3? It seems pretty strange to spend 120€ on a browsing CPU.
Does AMD offer something better in the low-range cpu market, that still has integrated graphics?
Or i should just ebay some 2nd\3rd gen i5s for 100 bucks?
I have two hard drives. One is an SSD with Windows on it. The other is a 7200rpm hard drive with mostly games from steam.
I need to build a pair of very low budget PCs for friends - Browser machines, no more.
Is the smartest CPU choice still a i3? It seems pretty strange to spend 120 on a browsing CPU.
Does AMD offer something better in the low-range cpu market, that still has integrated graphics?
Or i should just ebay some 2nd\3rd gen i5s for 100 bucks?
AMD has excellent very cheap FM2 APUs that will MORE THAN do the job for a browser PC. The A6 5400K can be had for $35 and it's an insane value for next to nothing. FWIW I'd rather have a Richland APU for power management improvements so the A4 7300 for $39 would be my goto choice.
My questions are:
- Will an RX480 even work with my motherboard (I realise you don't know what it is, but generally speaking) do I need some new fandangled modern motherboard?
- Even if I can put an RX480 in, am I just wasting my time, will the processor be a bottle neck?
- I can upgrade the RAM fairly painlessly, I assume that would help?
- Should I just quit dreaming and sob quietly in the corner?
Your advice will (hopefully) be greatly appreciated.
Ok, so please don't laugh at me....
I'm no PC builder and I last built a PC many moons ago. I sometimes flirt with this thread and dream of building an super gaming PC, but the reality is, I don't have the cash to justify on a whole new rig.
My existing PC has a Core 2 Quad Q6600 at 2.4ghz and 4gb of RAM. I am not at home at the moment and can't remember the motherboard.
Whilst reading the No Mans Sky thread it got me thinking anout buying it on PC, which in turn lead me to thinking maybe an RX480 might help? I could find £200 to fund it.
I will only be playing in 1080p and I thought I might get a smoother experience than on the PS4.
My questions are:
- Will an RX480 even work with my motherboard (I realise you don't know what it is, but generally speaking) do I need some new fandangled modern motherboard?
- Even if I can put an RX480 in, am I just wasting my time, will the processor be a bottle neck?
- I can upgrade the RAM fairly painlessly, I assume that would help?
- Should I just quit dreaming and sob quietly in the corner?
Your advice will (hopefully) be greatly appreciated.
I would like that, thank you. I used my 212 on a non-OC CPU because it's much quieter than Intel's stock cooler, I have no idea how it would perform in real world OC situation.
So guys what would you pick? The RX 480 Nitro for 332 euro (this is the price from overclockers.co.uk with shipping and danish vat) or a Sapphire Nitro OC+ R9 Fury for 380 euro? I will be playing at 1080p 144hz with freesync and it will go in my Current system with a Core i7 4790k. My PSU is fine for both got a Corsair AX850. Not sure if it's worth it at 1080? the RX 480 might be able to OC close to fury performance? as the fury dont overclock that well from what i have seen.
I can't detect anything off on this screenshot. If you suspect the monitor, you're going to have to take a picture of the screen itself.Here's an example of the problem I'm having with my new Acer XG270HU. Could someone please look at the fire in this screenshot and tell me if it looks off, and if so what I can possibly do about it?
I can't detect anything off on this screenshot. If you suspect the monitor, you're going to have to take a picture of the screen itself.
Shit that's tough. First off, that 480 price is just unreasonably high. Is getting a 4GB 480 a possibility? Here's the deal;
The Fury has higher ROPS, memory bandwidth and pixel rate - it's better in every way hands down. Except two things: Power and VRAM. Power, for me is not an issue. However, VRAM depends on what you think. If you think you will definitely need 8GB VRAM in the next 2 years, go for the RX 480 right away. If you don't (I really don't buy into the 8GB craze, but I'm in the minority) then there is a good case to be made for the Fury indeed. HOWEVER, if you are going 4GB then the 4GB 480 will probably be 50 EUR or so cheaper, which will make it a much more appealing price/perf buy.
So basically;
If you want 8GB get the 480
If you are ok with 4GB, get the 480 4GB if possible and if it's significantly cheaper, otherwise get the Fury.