Alexios
Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
Eh, just cos Nintendo funds Platinum and wants something in return (namely some co-ownership for the series they fund) doesn't make them first party the same like internal team games. Xeno 3 isn't on that level either, it's much more stable despite the scale (and an RPG, so hiccups matter less).What does the word “optimize” mean to you? It’s a five year old console with an even older ARM chip at its core. There is no secret sauce in there left to pull better performance. At this point it’s just a series of choices with an associated trade-off.
Ofcourse it is the dev's own fault (or goal)! Bayonetta 1 runs near flawlessly and is still an over the top crazy cool game, they could work on its (or DMC4's) level with whatever improvements they can squeeze/specialize for Switch vs multiplatform and new story/levels/mechanics but didn't do so.
For all you know Platinum would make the exact same decisions on any hardware, push scale, action, further at the expense of resolution, performance, etc. vs other games. Also they don't magically become AAA like Capcom and DMCV just cos Nintendo funds a B series/studio nobody else did.
Anyway, I don't think anybody would think Bayonetta 3 with its issues bests the best of PS360 yet between Dark Souls, Bayonetta, Crysis trilogy and other/Nintendo games Switch has shown it exceeds that by a good margin so it's not at fault if some devs don't try to shoot for that level, or can't.
To be honest they should have probably just gone for 30fps like Astral Chain for Bayonetta 3 and finely tune it to be super consistent instead. That would work out better for the Switch itself, for the game being hopefully both more impressive and more consistent, and for future 60fps ports too.
Pokemon is on a system with Dragon Quest XI (and indeed the Xenoblade games among others) in the same genre, come on. It's on UE4 and wasn't an exclusive or even made with Switch in mind as the portable version was supposed to be the wholly different 3DS game Japan got. And it's ace.
And yet people are mad and call them anti consumer because they don't try to make folks upgrade within the same gen? What happens if a Switch Pro can't do 4K/60 then, either in specific games or all of them but offers other improvements, it'll be anti consumer there's no New Switch Pro?
Last edited: