Killjoy-NL
Banned
Yes, so it's a but weird to see you trash Spiderman 2 like it's a great counter-argument, as it only highlights the disparity in quality.Yes. Hence the conversation.
Yes, so it's a but weird to see you trash Spiderman 2 like it's a great counter-argument, as it only highlights the disparity in quality.Yes. Hence the conversation.
You guys do realize this is just another Playstation title to PS installbase, right?
And the discussion was that this game won't sell amazingly well on PS5, because it doesn't have the quality and interest to match Sony 1st party.
I think the joke went over his head.Yes. Hence the conversation.
No, it didn't. I'm just sticking to the point.I think the joke went over his head.
No it doesn’t, because the game is crap. Okami sold about 300k copies, it’s one of the best games ever made. Saying ‘Indy will only sell 1.2m copies on PS because PS fans have higher standards’ is objectively false when a crap game like Spider-Man 2 outsells most other games on the platform. That’s what the entire exchange has been about.Yes, so it's a but weird to see you trash Spiderman 2 like it's a great counter-argument, as it only highlights the disparity in quality.
You telling me a quick RT on and off comparison wouldn't drop some panties?but you can get the pussy.
I'm watching the opening, the first 15 minutes is literally "press W to move forward" and "Press A to push thing", lolz.
thanks for killing one of my only remaining brain cells with that screen shot.You telling me a quick RT on and off comparison wouldn't drop some panties?
ruh roh
No it doesn’t, because the game is crap. Okami sold about 300k copies, it’s one of the best games ever made. Saying ‘Indy will only sell 1.2m copies on PS because PS fans have higher standards’ is objectively false when a crap game like Spider-Man 2 outsells most other games on the platform. That’s what the entire exchange has been about.
Fixed.No it doesn’t, because the game is crap. Okami sold about 300k copies, it’s one of the best games ever made. Saying ‘Indy will only sell 1.2m copies on PS because PS fans have higher standards’ is subjectively false when a crap game like Spider-Man 2 outsells most other games on the platform. That’s what the entire exchange has been about.
It's such an L that they are bringing commercial and ciritical success from spiderman.The guy is celebrating Sony and their fans literally being the Disney Marvel of video games and isn't intelligent enough to see how much of an L that actually is.
Yeah right, ok. Even the person I was talking too couldn’t point to anything beyond high production values when talking about SM2, and admitted the game is boring.Fixed.
I think some people are having a hard time grasping the reality of the different standards.
This isn't platform/console war anymore, it's titles on the same platform competing with eachother. Here's where quality and standards start to matter.
Can't we just be happy that there's a good Indy game, fuck's sake.
Don’t celebrate just yet. We saw what happened with Starfield.Well i said it'd score an 86 in my prediction post and i was right lol. I might try this game when it comes to the ps5 but i'm still iffy on what i'm hearing about combat and all the backtracking you have to do. Game looks great graphically and cinematic wise though no doubt that.
That was me.Yeah right, ok. Even the person I was talking too couldn’t point to anything beyond high production values when talking about SM2, and admitted the game is boring.
You're now going to divert to Taylor Swift and MCU?Sales have never been a good indicator of quality. Taylor Swift has sold 300m records, the MCU has made billions at the box office - you’d have to be dim to argue that that’s an indication of quality.
Production values trump boring arse missions like riding on bikes, playing as a deaf girl, playing asthe Crimson ChinMJ, the most cringe worthy writing known to man, SBI DEI being rammed down your throat and terrible pacing.
Such high standards.
PS fans have become like Marvel fans.
No, but that doesn’t mean it’ll be a lesser game than Spider-Man 2, which was a really poor video game.
No it doesn’t, because the game is crap. Okami sold about 300k copies, it’s one of the best games ever made. Saying ‘Indy will only sell 1.2m copies on PS because PS fans have higher standards’ is objectively false when a crap game like Spider-Man 2 outsells most other games on the platform. That’s what the entire exchange has been about.
Maybe tone down the console warring and fanboying a bit? I get you might not like Spiderman, but it's in no way a bad or crap game. The sales, critical reception and general word of mouth is proof enough of it. Objectively, ignoring bias, I doubt anyone can say Spiderman games are crap. They have excellent graphics, gameplay, mission design and traversal. Sure you might not like the story or characters but at first they are average. Also, you surely can't take what MJ said while under the influence of venom( who according to the game causes people to loose control of their emotions, brings out negativity and made even Peter aggressive) and Peter accepting that( while fresh from venom's effects and clearly mentally unwell) as evidence of DEI or somehow insomniac hating Peter or the gameplay purposed "making mj one shot enemies" as someone meaning MJ is more powerful than Peter. This are all clearly fanboy arguments from people who haven't bothered to play a game they are commenting on.The guy is celebrating Sony and their fans literally being the Disney Marvel of video games and isn't intelligent enough to see how much of an L that actually is.
300million btw and reused assetsProduction values trump boring arse missions like riding on bikes, playing as a deaf girl, playing asthe Crimson ChinMJ, the most cringe worthy writing known to man, SBI DEI being rammed down your throat and terrible pacing.
Such high standards.
PS fans have become like Marvel fans.
Why restart the conversation in the middle then?That was me.
I’m trying to explain to you that sales =/= quality using examples from other industries that might be easy to wrap your head around. You said this game would only sell 1.2m as PS users have higher standardsYou're now going to divert to Taylor Swift and MCU?
Because Nostradamus here wanted to bring up PS sales (for a game releasing on the platform in 3 months’ time?) and the depth of ‘quality’ on the platform.Why are people arguing about Spider-Man 2?
Sorry bro, I'm not sure if I have the time and energy to do the OT. I'll also probably be playing it over the holidays and not day 1 since I'm knee deep into this gacha game I'm playing rn, Wuthering Waves.
Maybe Draugoth wants to pick this one up since he also did this review thread.
I know.The Fartist its a joke my man.
I didn't.Why restart the conversation in the middle then?
First of all, I didn't bring up sales on PS5.I’m trying to explain to you that sales =/= quality using examples from other industries that might be easy to wrap your head around. You said this game would only sell 1.2m as PS users have higher standards
Because Nostradamus here wanted to bring up PS sales (for a game releasing on the platform in 3 months’ time?) and the depth of ‘quality’ on the platform.
It’s not console warring though or fanboying is it? This is the default response for some when you genuinely criticise a PS or Xbox game, and it’s because you can’t comprehend that someone would have genuine dissatisfaction or dislike for a game that you personally enjoy. Fuck Sony, fuck Microsoft, fuck Nintendo, fuck Valve - there you, that’s my official position. I like good games.Maybe tone down the console warring and fanboying a bit?
A BlackRock ran games industry reviewed a SBI BlackRock game highly. Colour me surprised.I get you might not like Spiderman, but it's in no way a bad or crap game. The sales, critical reception and general word of mouth is proof enough of it.
I didn’t say Spider-Man games are crap though did I? Because I liked Spider-Man and MM enough to Platinum them.Objectively, ignoring bias, I doubt anyone can say Spiderman games are crap.
Allowing MJ to 1 shot normal human being enemies whom Spider-Man (a Super-Hero) has to land 5-10 blows on is the very definition of stupidity. The fact that roundabout lala clown world justifications need to be given to prove otherwise says it all.They have excellent graphics, gameplay, mission design and traversal. Sure you might not like the story or characters but at first they are average. Also, you surely can't take what MJ said while under the influence of venom( who according to the game causes people to loose control of their emotions, brings out negativity and made even Peter aggressive) and Peter accepting that( while fresh from venom's effects and clearly mentally unwell) as evidence of DEI or somehow insomniac hating Peter or the gameplay purposed "making mj one shot enemies" as someone meaning MJ is more powerful than Peter. This are all clearly fanboy arguments from people who haven't bothered to play a game they are commenting on.
Is insomniac DEI? Yes, but have they treated these games extremely well along with Peter? Yes.
Who cares dude?You guys do realize this is just another Playstation title to PS installbase, right?
My mistake, I must have misunderstood this comment:First of all, I didn't bring up sales on PS5.
Ehh it'll probably sell something like 1-2M on PS5.
I’ve not played this game, to be honest I’d be surprised if you’ve played it or reviewed enough of the public information in order to form an actual view. My view is SBI and tailored review outlets is a major red flag.Secondly, how is that to somehow prove how amazing this game is, you have to drag 3 completely unrelated things into it (Spiderman 2, Taylor Swift and MCU) as if that would put any weight to whatever point you're trying to make?
Why not point to whatever strength stands out in this game?
I never even said Indy is trash or bad, just that it seems mediocre.
Possible. Or maybe they dont think the game is anything special.Pure Xbox have been taking the Ambassador programme ending personally.
That’s a good way to get black listed by Bethesda.Pure Xbox have been taking the Ambassador programme ending personally.
It's all good, it happens.My mistake, I must have misunderstood this comment:
I've watched the first 2 hours yesterday.I’ve not played this game, to be honest I’d be surprised if you’ve played it or reviewed enough of the public information in order to form an actual view. My view is SBI and tailored review outlets is a major red flag.
Whats wrong with waiting few more days to see independend reviewers give their opinion? Surely it should be ok to at least check it out, insteady of relying on ppl who are biased by default.
Game is single player so even if u play it in a year u will only benefit- it will be more polished/bug free and likely cheaper, no need to rush/preorder at all
I figured it was the very beginning of the game but I went ahead and put the spoiler tag in.Could you put that shit under spoilers please ???
Goddam ign cannot let you experience a great idea without telling you first because they never had friends and did not socialize enough to know that's a lame move...
Explains why there's no review from Skill Up yet, looks like they were selective about who got keys yet again.
Performance looks far better than expected though:
Guess they are now Filthy Xbox.Pure Xbox have been taking the Ambassador programme ending personally.
You are fucking mental in the head.And the discussion was that this game won't sell amazingly well on PS5, because it doesn't have the quality and interest to match Sony 1st party.
I'm not upset at all. If you pay attention, you'd see me respond to people who are actually upset over what I said.Why are you so upset that this game might be good? Killjoy-NL
Talking about boomer behaviour in a thread about a game that has to rely on nostalgia.I guess your nickname now makes sense since you are so keen on gatekeeping the "quality" of games. Such lame boomer behaviour.
Performs really really good so far, enjoying it alotAny word on performance for Series X?