I swear this thread already existed on gaf less than a month ago
With the same egocentric narrative
Financial security and feeling safe tops it.B. Women care almost solely about looks. At least initially. A metric ton of my close lady friends have more or less confirmed this
Dude, as someone who loves science and psychology, I would love to see how this would play out.Don’t tell them you are driving an Uber. Make something up. If your goal is just to get laid then just lie through your teeth. If you are a hoping to find a wife out of these broads then continue telling the truth and eventually someone will not hold it against you.
Try this on the next 5 dates and see if you get a second date.
As a gay man partnered for many years now, I would love to hear that some guy was doing Uber on a date. To me it comes off as hard working and it’s a job that takes balls.Working as an Uber is probably peak red flag filter to test out whose women are worth a chance. In my country at least this ain't no broke person job.
I think taxi/uber drivers have a reputation for being grungy. Blame the cities. When I was in Tokyo, the taxi drivers there seem a lot more like chauffeurs, completely different feeling. Doing uber should prove to women that a man can talk and has good social skills, butAs a gay man partnered for many years now, I would love to hear that some guy was doing Uber on a date. To me it comes off as hard working and it’s a job that takes balls.
All these liberal white collar women so concerned about social justice, could easily solve part of the problem by dating working class men. You want to solve class divide? Marry the working class and the poorer. Same for men.
There’s no shame in it.
Doing uber should prove to women that a man can talk and has good social skills, but
It’s not here either. I do about ~$1000 a week usually but the social stigma is too strong for em I guess :/Working as an Uber is probably peak red flag filter to test out whose women are worth a chance. In my country at least this ain't no broke person job.
It’s not here either. I do about ~$1000 a week usually but the social stigma is too strong for em I guess :/
That’s precisely what it is. Cause I explain my long term goals after but they’re already checked out from disinterest. I could saySometimes it's not the money, but the lack of a long term plan or career path that is off-putting, too. Even if you do have one, many stop listening after "Uber".
First I've heard of this statistic and I'm genuinely shocked by how low it is.Only around 60% of men have a biological child.
That’s precisely what it is. Cause I explain my long term goals after but they’re already checked out from disinterest. I could say
“But I’m actually traveling to Austin to cash out my 50 million dollar winning lottery ticket next week” and they’d still be disinterested lol
We also each have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors. This is a big part of why women are often uninterested in "average" men, even when they could be considered average themselves, which confounds a lot of people in the current open dating market. It's a key facet of human reproductive imperatives.First I've heard of this statistic and I'm genuinely shocked by how low it is.
I think you're adding a layer of interpretation to that study which may not necessarily exist. I don't see any evidence for womens' preference playing a central role in the genetic results. They could just as well be because of "Genghis Khan" like effects of mass rape, or women dying during child birth and men re-marrying.We also each have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors. This is a big part of why women are often uninterested in "average" men, even when they could be considered average themselves, which confounds a lot of people in the current open dating market. It's a key facet of human reproductive imperatives.
Actually honest to god I wouldn’t. I’m not someone who cares about occupation at all. If I found a woman physically attractive and felt there was chemistry between us, she could work at McDonald’s I wouldn’t give a fuckTo be fair, you'd probably be skeptical too. Actions speak louder than words, and lots of guys straight up lie about this kind of thing, so after you've met enough guys who talk a big game but are actually losers and never get their shit together, you stop giving new men the benefit of the doubt.
As a person that has been alive for 27 years, and has been completely and forever invisible to women romantically and sexually (Despite trying in every possible way for years), and who's only success with women is them thinking I'm a fun and nice friend, reading this I can't stop myself from doing this:
It just genuinely annoys me.
You need to start saying, 'no' to them sometimes. Seriously, some'll start begging for you.
Not all out rejection of them, but telling them you don't agree, ideally with an alternative.
I'm a fun and nice friend
Depends who you say no to. Some will take that to mean screwing around while screwing with youYou need to start saying, 'no' to them sometimes. Seriously, some'll start begging for you.
Not all out rejection of them, but telling them you don't agree, ideally with an alternative.
Actually a pretty good read on it. Lately I’ve found things go better for me when I’m just authentically myself and not in “impress and entertain this woman” modeFrom my very surface-level read, the rejections come because you don’t appear nonchalant enough, and also ”don’t know who you are”. Basically they want a badass making a lot of money who enjoys what they’re doing at the same time.
BRB bout to go jump off a bridgeFirst of all OP, you are not alone. This is dating in 2024 as a man. Harder than ever, zero question about it. Social media is absolute poison to human relationships and it has made dating a mess.
I’d say a few things - EvilOre is wise and he is correct - get a better job, or lie (NEVER lie to woman who you want a long term relationship with, however). Very few women will date you as an Uber Driver. Facts. Also realize that dating is inherently unfair and brutal to average men. Accept it, deep in your soul, be at peace with it - shit is going to be HARD with a lot of rejection. It will be a long process to get anywhere.
Secondly, if you’re using dating apps, get help. There’s plenty of good YouTube channels with profile tutorials for dating sites. I remember when I made some changes to my profile my matches increased by 10x. Consider using something like FaceApp for enhancing your photos (mild enhancements, don’t go crazy, basically the equivalent of getting pictures professionally done for much cheaper).
I also really like Corey Wayne’s work on dating. Some of the best mindset advice for men dating that I’ve ever seen - his stuff works, and it’s common sense stuff that most men (including me) overlook because it’s counter-instinctual.
That has been the case for most of human history. Only about 50% of men historically pass on their genetics as to why whe have twice as many female ancestors as males. So 50% of men of no children and the other 50% get two women on average pregnant. The reason it's so noticeable now is because men used to die in war, or would have been monks etc. it's more observable now.First I've heard of this statistic and I'm genuinely shocked by how low it is.
I reckon women feel the same, tbh.First of all OP, you are not alone. This is dating in 2024 as a man. Harder than ever, zero question about it.
Ok, but when we say that a certain country has an average birth rate of 2.5 (for example), does that mean 2.5 children for every woman giving birth? Because if not, then it wouldn't be considered above the rate of replacement.That has been the case for most of human history. Only about 50% of men historically pass on their genetics as to why whe have twice as many female ancestors as males. So 50% of men of no children and the other 50% get two women on average pregnant. The reason it's so noticeable now is because men used to die in war, or would have been monks etc. it's more observable now.
It is weird when you think about but it is the case. You can have 100 men and 100 women and 99 men can have no children and 1 man can impregnate all 100 women and have 2.1 children with each and replace the entire population. That's how it was works but of course in an extreme case.Ok, but when we say that a certain country has an average birth rate of 2.5 (for example), does that mean 2.5 children for every woman giving birth? Because if not, then it wouldn't be considered above the rate of replacement.
Which means there are a similar number of men having 0 kids as men having 5 kids from two women in such a scenario. Even in EviLore's 60% scenario this would be roughly correct. That's kind of wild to me.
I hear you. In reality not all women even give birth so it's interesting to look at how these numbers translate into average number of children per father. They'd have to be quite higher than the reported rate of birth to make sense.It is weird when you think about but it is the case. You can have 100 men and 100 women and 99 men can have no children and 1 man can impregnate all 100 women and have 2.1 children with each and replace the entire population. That's how it was works but of course in an extreme case.
CEO shit right here.Hot take. If dating apps allow a number for height, they should also put a number for weight
Completely agreeHot take. If dating apps allow a number for height, they should also put a number for weight