Sorry I didn't follow this closely but are the leaks true anyway? If they are, I really don't care from who they come from.
The leaks are true, the stuff people say they contain and prove isn't 9/10 times.
Sorry I didn't follow this closely but are the leaks true anyway? If they are, I really don't care from who they come from.
That's because Chelsea Manning has already been convicted. Julian Assange has not even been tried.You just proved you don't know what you are talking about with that sentence. Bradley Manning is not facing the death penalty.
The leaks are true, the stuff people say they contain and prove isn't 9/10 times.
That's because Chelsea Manning has already been convicted. Julian Assange has not even been tried.
Weird. So what is true?
Bless your heart.I mean if people like you think mass surveillance and a police state, torture, media manipulation, constant illegal wars, and ultimately, ultimate power over us little peons is OK, then you deserve the fate you are heading towards.
People like Snowden and Assange are on our sides, I don't know how the media can manipulate your brain to think otherwise, unless nothing is between your ears.
You'd have to read the thousands of emails for yourself, honestly.
For the DNC leaks: The bad stuff is that the employees had personal opinions on who they wanted to win the primary(politically active people have opinions, who knew), and occasionally tossed around ideas on how to help Hillary that never got used. One employee who is now fired said something very anti-semitic. None of the ideas were acted on.
For the Podesta leaks: There's shitloads of stuff to go through, so reading it is best. But, as an example, one of the more common accusations is that Hillary met with one of her donors(to Clinton Foundation) while secretary of state. But, you also have to mention, this donor is a world leader and the secretary of state's job is kinda to meet with world leaders. Most of the accusations go like that.
Well... Yeah, exactly?No, but Wikileaks ordinarily never says anything about the sources of anything they release. So the fact that Assange went public with the statement that they are not from Russia is extremely significant.
Considering how well-known it is that Assange dislikes Hillary, it wouldn't make sense for him to do this unless he really thought that this perceived Russian association was undermining the other stuff that Wikileaks releases.
Bless your heart.
And lastly, fearing extradition to the US is ridiculous. Sweden doesn't extradite either for political crimes or when the death penalty could be in play, both of which apply if the US accuses Assange of espionage. Not to mention that any further extraditions now also require UK court approval because they're responsible for the original extradition!
That doesn't mean a lot though, I seem to recall a lot of people on this board also wanting Snowden to be returned to the US and prosecuted. This board is often very strongly pro-authoritarian.
Really? Always? Even when they were releasing material about the Iraq War and the TPP?
Well, scratch the second one, I know how pro-TPP and pro-trade agreements this board is too.
Also I don't know what 'the detriment of America' is in this case, is it not to the benefit of American citizens that secret materials about the inner workings of their government be made public?
Absolutely not?
If you think Assange would face the death penalty if convicted I don't know what to say to you. The international outrage would be so large that the US would never even contemplate it.
I mean if people like you think mass surveillance and a police state, torture, media manipulation, constant illegal wars, and ultimately, ultimate power over us little peons is OK, then you deserve the fate you are heading towards.
People like Snowden and Assange are on our sides, I don't know how the media can manipulate your brain to think otherwise, unless nothing is between your ears.
Not that I'm aware of.
The wikileaks twitter did link to a reddit thread that had accusations in the replies though.
He'll go to jail and suddenly it will turn out that he "commited suicide" and that's the last you'll hear of it.
Media will call him a coward and bam, no international outrage.
My eyes, they won't stop rolling.
The US frowns and threatens trade sanctions, Sweden complies. We had no problems giving up people to Egyptian torture prisons by way of the CIA, an undeniable fact - yet thinking that Assange might also be given up in a heartbeat is "ridiculous"?
For the record, I also think that the case is too public to have Sweden just roll over, but you would be stupid to stake your own life on it given our shitty track record. It's easier to be rational and calculate odds when you don't personally have a life in prison at stake.
Assange is a bit of a cunt for sure, but obviously not that stupid.
Yeah I wouldn't put it past them. The same 'suicide' happened to weapons inspector David Kelly here in the UK over his findings over the Iraq war and lack of evidence of WMDs.
What the fuck is this shit? If there is a truth that can be proven that goes against your position, and you willfully ignore or squash it, we have a word for you: asshole.The most amazing thing about this election is how people who used to hate something now suddenly love it just because it now supports their position instead of opposing it. I mean, just look at Hannity and Assange.
Wikileaks used to be a hero when they were leaking the Bush stuff, including that video of the Iraq War a number of years back. Now they are suddenly a villain who are a propaganda arm of Vladimir Putin. It kind of makes you wonder sometimes. The truth is always only what agrees with your position, no matter what your position is on the political spectrum.
You might also remember that the Egyptian case triggered a massive national scandal. It's not something the government would want repeated. It's also massively different: it was during the heyday of the post-9/11 hysteria and was likewise for terrorist charges which made the decision legal, although extremely controversial and against the spirit of of the law.
Extraditing Assange on espionage charges would be extremely illegal. We don't extradite people accused of political crimes and we would also need approval from the UK High Court as well to consider extraditing Assange for anything. It's not happening.
Assange is either a paranoid nutjob or a he's using this conspiracy theory to escape justice. Possibly both.
Which is another conspiracy theory. Kelly may very well have been hounded to the point of suicide, but calling it murder is complete conjecture lacking any hard evidence.
https://www.google.se/amp/s/amp.the...d-kelly-man-secrets?client=ms-android-samsung
Defend all you want.
What is not conjecture is the war in Iraq was illegal. There were no WMDs. Hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives because of that war. Hundreds of thousands is low-balling it as well.
That war was all about stealing oil from Iraq and the geo-politics between the evil Saudis, Iran and the West.
This is a whole bunch of nonense. Russia invades countries all the time, and influences ones they don't likeThe amount of death caused by the wars the West propagates is astronomical. Death directly from bombs and drones and the soldiers, but countless many more from famine and the poverty it causes. If we didn't intervene, those deaths would not have occurred, it's as simple as that. Hussain was a bad man but he kept the country in order. For much the same reason we can thank Russia that they vetoed any military action by the West in Syria.
Russia gets painted as a great danger to the world, but how many countries have they invaded and wars have they started in the last 20 years? Now compare that to the great US? It's no fucking comparison. Don't give me this bullshit.
Research the 'petrodollar' if you want to learn something about what's really going on here.
The amount of death caused by the wars the West propagates is astronomical. Death directly from bombs and drones and the soldiers, but countless many more from famine and the poverty it causes. If we didn't intervene, those deaths would not have occurred, it's as simple as that. Hussain was a bad man but he kept the country in order. For much the same reason we can thank Russia that they vetoed any military action by the West in Syria.
Russia gets painted as a great danger to the world, but how many countries have they invaded and wars have they started in the last 20 years? Now compare that to the great US? It's no fucking comparison. Don't give me this bullshit.
Research the 'petrodollar' if you want to learn something about what's really going on here.
The invasion of Ukraine was illegal and that is proof Russia was behind the DNC leak. Or does it not work that way ?
What does that have to do with anything that poster said? He specifically called out your claim of Kelly's death being a murder a conspiracy theory without proof. The motivations of the Iraq War have nothing to do with that.
The amount of death caused by the wars the West propagates is astronomical. Death directly from bombs and drones and the soldiers, but countless many more from famine and the poverty it causes. If we didn't intervene, those deaths would not have occurred, it's as simple as that. Hussain was a bad man but he kept the country in order. For much the same reason we can thank Russia that they vetoed any military action by the West in Syria.
Russia gets painted as a great danger to the world, but how many countries have they invaded and wars have they started in the last 20 years? Now compare that to the great US? It's no fucking comparison. Don't give me this bullshit.
Research the 'petrodollar' if you want to learn something about what's really going on here.
The democratically elected leader of Ukraine, Yanukovych, was on the verge of signing a multi-billion dollar energy deal with Russia. The West didn't like this so backed an illegal military coup to oust him, and hence the war and death again. Research it.
The amount of death caused by the wars the West propagates is astronomical. Death directly from bombs and drones and the soldiers, but countless many more from famine and the poverty it causes. If we didn't intervene, those deaths would not have occurred, it's as simple as that. Hussain was a bad man but he kept the country in order. For much the same reason we can thank Russia that they vetoed any military action by the West in Syria.
Russia gets painted as a great danger to the world, but how many countries have they invaded and wars have they started in the last 20 years? Now compare that to the great US? It's no fucking comparison. Don't give me this bullshit.
Research the 'petrodollar' if you want to learn something about what's really going on here.
They do as this weapons inspector exposed how the dossiers were sexed up to push through an action of war and invasion in Iraq.
Crimea?
You know everything that's going on with the Ukraine.
Yeah look at who instigated that whole episode. It weren't Russia.
And that's compared to Iraq, Afghanistan, medling Libya.
That's also compared to the US and allies creating and supplying ISIL, Al Quaeda, El Nusra and other now terrorist groups in a bid to oust so-called despotic Middle-and near Eastern regimes like Hussein, Gadafi, Assad.
Yeah look at who instigated that whole episode. It weren't Russia.
And that's compared to Iraq, Afghanistan, medling Libya.
That's also compared to the US and allies creating and supplying ISIL, Al Quaeda, El Nusra and other now terrorist groups in a bid to oust so-called despotic Middle-and near Eastern regimes like Hussein, Gadafi, Assad.
Yeah look at who instigated that whole episode. It weren't Russia.
And that's compared to Iraq, Afghanistan, medling Libya.
That's also compared to the US and allies creating and supplying ISIL, Al Quaeda, El Nusra and other now terrorist groups in a bid to oust so-called despotic Middle-and near Eastern regimes like Hussein, Gadafi, Assad.
Russia had invaded plenty of countries (see: Ukraine, Georgia) Not only that, they annex them after doing so!
This post is insane.
No, that doesn't make the motivations for the Iraq War relevant in this discussion.
Somebody was supposed to, I'm just glad somebody finally did.Assange called Sean Hannity?
Somebody was supposed to, I'm just glad somebody finally did.
Well I'm convinced.
Assange are on our sides, I don't know how the media can manipulate your brain to think otherwise, unless nothing is between your ears.
your loss. Unbelievable. I'm out.
No, he isn't. Assange only cares about himself and his self interests.
.
But your politicians don't huh? That's it, be a good little citizen and eat up the shit they'll keep feeding you. Lol indeed.
But your politicians don't huh? That's it, be a good little citizen and eat up the shit they'll keep feeding you. Lol indeed.
But your politicians don't huh? That's it, be a good little citizen and eat up the shit they'll keep feeding you. Lol indeed.
That's another thing I've noticed, people seem to think that government is the same as the one that charged blindly into Iraq.
I think this is the part where he tells us they're all the same and the battles between Republicans and Democrats are just a charade to throw the wool over our eyes.