Jawmuncher
Member
We got a week.
I plan on linking your OT in mine, btw. Just a heads up to keep some sorta synergy for this JW event.
Sounds good. Mine will go up on the 11th.
We got a week.
I plan on linking your OT in mine, btw. Just a heads up to keep some sorta synergy for this JW event.
Bad quality, but the i-rex looks huge in this tv spot (spot 25).
Sup.
Still at a loss as to why the movie is having such a uphill battle on GAF.
Those things should have only been an issue with a vocal minority. Instead, there's a handful of we optimistic folk who are as such.The original ideas seemed silly as hell with the bigger, badder diabolus rex, the trailers were less than impressive, and then there was that "sexist", cheesy clip thread.
I don't think it's surprising.
I do wonder how many people will criticize the camouflage thing, saying it's clear they don't know Jurassic Park, etc, etc... only to later find out it was in The Lost World novel.
The original ideas seemed silly as hell with the bigger, badder diabolus rex, the trailers were less than impressive, and then there was that "sexist", cheesy clip thread.
I don't think it's surprising.
Damn it, that clip was not sexist.
That was pretty much me in high school.
I wasn't saying it was. Just how it was labeled.
Maybe you were sexist!
Also these emoticons popped up on Facebook. Thought they were funny.
Also these emoticons popped up on Facebook. Thought they were funny.
I wasn't saying it was. Just how it was labeled.
Yeah, I've no idea how that even became a overblown thing.
Sneak Peek at the Mondo Jurassic Park Gallery Show!
http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/fe...the-mondo-jurassic-park-gallery-show#/slide/3
Either Ellie or Malcolm's daughter? Weird.That JP1 TRex one is cool but who is the fifth person? And why is that TRex, like, flying? Where his feet should be landing behind that jeep just don't seem right.
That JP1 TRex one is cool but who is the fifth person? And why is that TRex, like, flying? Where his feet should be landing behind that jeep just don't seem right.
I really like the idea that this group of geneticists arent the only people who can make a dinosaur, Trevorrow told us. You know, when you think of the differences between Apple and PC the minute something goes open-source, there are all kinds of entities and interests that may be able to utilise that technology.
Trevorrow went on to expand on his idea, explaining that it would be like the way we have relationships with animals on this planet right now there are animals that are kept in zoos, like Jurassic Park, but they are also used in agriculture, and medicine and in war.
So it sounds like we could be seeing velociraptors on the battlefield, triceratops ploughing the fields and T-Rex grafts on the NHS but of course, because this is the world of Jurassic Park, this open-source dino-ing would have dire consequences.
We are the Alpha now, Trevorrow said, and we dominate all of the other animals. But when you throw in animals that were the Alpha on this planet for far longer than weve ever existed in with us I dont really know whos in charge there.
Sounds pretty terrifying and Trevorrow deliberately leaves the door open for these possibilities in Jurassic World with one key scene, and which Trevorrow described as an attempt to leave possibilities open that were relatively endless.(which we wont discuss in too much detail to avoid spoilers) involving dinosaur embryos being smuggled off the island
Sadly, however, Trevorrow might not be the director to see these endless possibilities through, and could take a step back from directing to more of a background creative role in any future Jurassic World films.
I feel that much like with what theyre doing with Star Wars, this might be the kind of franchise that would be best served by different visions, just different directors, really new interesting ideas thrown into this pot, Trevorrow told RadioTimes.com.
But I thought that a gift I could give one of those directors is to create an opportunity for storytelling that will at least get us off this island, potentially. And not have these movies continuously be people running away from dinosaurs on an island, because Im not sure how long that can keep entertaining us.
One way or another, it looks like in the future we could be seeing dinosaurs out of their cages for a real Jurassic World or rather, Jurassic Earth
TV Spot 26
Like 2 new scenes but extremely short. Also, so many freaking spots, we might be heading in Avengers territory.
That JP1 TRex one is cool but who is the fifth person? And why is that TRex, like, flying? Where his feet should be landing behind that jeep just don't seem right.
Yeah, that about sums up the feelings actual dinosaur fans have about the recent mainstream treatment of their favorite animals.Also these emoticons popped up on Facebook. Thought they were funny.
Well because she's old. She either dies at the hands of a more agile hunter, old age, off camera, or she can go out heroically. There's really only one choice.You know ...
Why would Trevorrow bring back the original "Rex" only (if you believe those reviews) only to have her getting killed by the I-Rex? I hope she survives though ... but meh. Can't handle another Rex-Death XD
... again, if anyone managed to nab that spoiler from Levernus on IMDB, let me know.
Well because she's old. She either dies at the hands of a more agile hunter, old age, off camera, or she can go out heroically. There's really only one choice.
Hey - look at the box colouration:
You think I Rex will act more like a chameleon than a cuttlefish, and use wild vivid colours to display emotion?
Would be really cool if that happens. Though wouldn't there have been some sort of color changing toy to accommodate that?
Would be really cool if that happens. Though wouldn't there have been some sort of color changing toy to accommodate that?
They have the I-Rex toy that lights up.They clearly haven't bothered with the toys, but they could have if they wanted to. They could make an I. Rex toy that changes colour when doused in hot water.
“I wasn’t bothered by what he said about the movie and, to be honest, I don’t totally disagree with him,” said Trevorrow. “I wonder why [Universal] chose a clip like that, that shows an isolated situation within a movie that has an internal logic. That starts with characters that are almost archetypes, stereotypes that are deconstructed as the story progresses. The real protagonist of the movie is Claire and we embrace her femininity in the story’s progression. There’s no need for a female character that does things like a male character, that’s not what makes interesting female characters in my view. Bryce and I have talked a lot about these concepts and aspects of his character.”
Howard echoed Trevorrow’s opinion two days ago to Huffington Post, saying of Whedon, “He’s a hero, he’s an amazing guy and a champion for women in this industry. Marketing for a film is tricky because you release stuff without context. Of course there was a part of me being such a fan of him that was like, ‘Nooooo!’ Especially because when you see the movie it’s not at all like that, but we make movies and it’s out there for public opinion and I hope he likes the movie!”
“But I was upset about people’s reaction to his film,” Trevorrow continued. “Joss recieved an incredible amount of anger and vitriolic comments and he doesn’t deserve that, because if there is someone who has always paid due respect to the women of his movies that guy is Joss. I think he should be the last person in Hollywood to be accused of sexism and if you’ve seen something like that in his last movie it’s not his fault. We all know that Joss is too kind and polite to rise up and tell people to screw off, so I’ll do it on his behalf!”
“I shouldn’t have tweeted it,” Whedon told Variety. “I don’t ever say things about other people’s work that are negative. That’s bad form. It’s not what a gentleman would do.I forgot that I don’t do that because I was frustrated. I felt like I was seeing something that was problematic. What I said is pretty clear, but I think it was the wrong venue for me to be saying that. That’s dinner party conversation.”
And, for the old school: Stan Winston School just released a retrospective clip on TLW raptors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpR5ZyKyqYc
Also like seeing Trevorrow's thoughts on female protagonists. We are of the same mind it seems.
I thought about that, too, but at this point in the campaign, I would rather see her in all her glory in the theater than get tidbits. Same for Pratt, too, to be frank. Cut up shots and promos won't do the movie justice if it turns out to be truly great.Colin is a young filmmaker of this generation and I really don't feel as if he would be blind enough to create something sexist. It's a bullet right to a film's head. Something that does bother me, again not his fault, but if Claire is indeed the central protagonist, I mean wouldn't it have been nice to see her featured in promo materials like the posters more than Pratt? I mean I get that Pratt has the marketing gravitas, but they should at least portray Claire in cool ways too.
Colin is a young filmmaker of this generation and I really don't feel as if he would be blind enough to create something sexist. It's a bullet right to a film's head. Something that does bother me, again not his fault, but if Claire is indeed the central protagonist, I mean wouldn't it have been nice to see her featured in promo materials like the posters more than Pratt? I mean I get that Pratt has the marketing gravitas, but they should at least portray Claire in cool ways too.
I thought about that, too, but at this point in the campaign, I would rather see her in all her glory in the theater than get tidbits. Same for Pratt, too, to be frank. Cut up shots and promos won't do the movie justice if it turns out to be truly great.
In a weird selfish way, I kinda like that she isn't featured as much because I wanna save it for when I actually see the film, whereas Pratt doing cool things/looking cool is very much expected lol.