What doed cheating have to do with feminism?
Honest question, it seems unrelated to me.
It's not the cheating that sticks out as much as he sounds like he took advantage of and preened young, likely impressionable fans and actresses.
What doed cheating have to do with feminism?
Honest question, it seems unrelated to me.
It looks hypocritical to say you respect women when you repeatedly and habitually disrespect the one woman you committed to hold above all others.
Cheating on your partner has nothing to do with feminism.
It is a larger issue though. She doesn't know if he used protection, and even then he still has a chance of passing an STD.Being a horny serial cheater isn't really unfeminist, the whole "denied me the right to make decisions about my body based on the truth" line seems like an attempt to make a larger issue of an essentially personal problem.
How about using your power as a producer to coerce younger actresses? Which she stated in her blog.
That's the real problem and what would make him a hypocrite.It's not the cheating that sticks out as much as he sounds like he took advantage of and preened young, likely impressionable fans and actresses.
Well, in this case he cited his feminism to feed some bullshit to his wife about cheating.
Cheating on your partner has nothing to do with feminism.
You have a very limited definition of feminism if you think it doesn't include women (and everyone really) having the right to make informed decisions about their bodies in sexual situations.And yet it still has nothing to do with feminism.
It is a larger issue though. She doesn't know if he used protection, and even then he still has a chance of passing an STD.
You could say this in a vacuum, I guess, but the fact is that he was a man in power in a male dominated field, having affairs with women on the project he's leading. And he somehow felt like he could get away with it, and the wife at home didn't need to know?
Also notice how he described the problem as being that he's too good and the women are the flawed and 'needy', 'aggressive' ones.
Many feminist issues are public health issues. They aren't mutually exclusive. Feminism isn't just concerned about women, by the way.The same is true of cheating regardless of gender, though. That's a public health issue, but it's not a feminist issue.
It's not the cheating that sticks out as much as he sounds like he took advantage of and preened young, likely impressionable fans and actresses.
You have a very limited definition of feminism if you think it doesn't include women (and everyone really) having the right to make informed decisions about their bodies in sexual situations.
Just like sports stars and politicians, no?wow nerdy dude gets power and money, and turns into a scumbag, i am so surprised!
So why does everyone just believe his without questioning it?
Knowing very little about this aside from some rumors here and there, this sounds more like a angry ex-wife that tries to ruin the reputation of her ex-husband. Sure she is allowed to be angry if all that is really true. But taking stuff like this to the public always carries some kind of "stink".
The same is true of cheating regardless of gender, though. That's a public health issue, but it's not a feminist issue, unless you think feminism encompasses literally the entirety of the concepts of consent and bodily autonomy.
That's one way of looking at it. Or it could be that Whedon being a trendy guy at the time was surrounded by actresses that saw an opportunity and pursued it to the point of looking aggressive and/or needy. This isn't a comdemnation of all women, or even all the women Whedon interacted with, it was just something he encountered a lot.You could say this in a vacuum, I guess, but the fact is that he was a man in power in a male dominated field, having affairs with women on the project he's leading. And he somehow felt like he could get away with it, and the wife at home didn't need to know?
Also notice how he described the problem as being that he's too good and the women are the flawed and 'needy', 'aggressive' ones.
Honestly question, if someone wants to sleep with you because you are famous/talented or they think it will help them advance their career, are you to blame for doing it? Whedon isn't exactly Mick Jagger but I don't doubt he legitimately had people interested in him just for being himself or for being in charge of so many projects, no "grooming" required.
Like, telling an actress they have to sleep with you or they won't get a part is one thing, but what if it's initiated by the "less powerful" party? Is it the more powerful's responsibility to deny regardless of circumstance because of the dynamic?
Stop? Seriously? Yes, if a woman cheats on her man and knowingly exposes him to an STD in doing so yeah, if say she's being a terrible feminist in this case.STOP.
So what does it mean when a woman cheats on her man? Is she now against feminism or some other ism I'm not aware of that she violated?
Yes? The propositioned party is still at liberty to deny sexual advances.
Yeah, I'll echo in saying that the Wonder Woman script thing severely softened the blow of this "news" for me.
Especially given these are younger actresses. It's unprofessional to be the showrunner and married and bang actresses you cast/random fans.
Yes? The propositioned party is still at liberty to deny sexual advances.
Stop? Seriously? Yes, if a woman cheats on her man and knowingly exposes him to an STD in doing so yeah, if say she's being a terrible feminist in this case.
Unprofessional sure, but don't really see the feminism angle.
What doed cheating have to do with feminism?
Honest question, it seems unrelated to me.
The show Girlfriend's Guide to Divorce has a cheating director husband character who is having an affair with a 20 year old actress, who is the star of a CW show about vampire hunting. I always suspected it was some low-key tea spillage because the showrunner of Girlfriend's Guide is Marti Nixon who...*drumroll* was a producer on Buffy. I just never imagined it might be about Joss. But who knows.
Big fan of Whedon, I'd hate to find out he's been doing some dirt.
Honestly question, if someone wants to sleep with you because you are famous/talented or they think it will help them advance their career, are you to blame for doing it? Whedon isn't exactly Mick Jagger but I don't doubt he legitimately had people interested in him just for being himself or for being in charge of so many projects, no "grooming" required.
Like, telling an actress they have to sleep with you or they won't get a part is one thing, but what if it's initiated by the "less powerful" party? Is it the more powerful's responsibility to deny regardless of circumstance because of the dynamic?
I know that, but are you suggesting that Whedon (or any famous person) should turn down ANY advances from anyone who works in the same field or claims to be a fan?
Okay congratulations? Did you think you knew everything there was to know about the many different ways feminism is interpreted?LOL
Literally the first time I've ever heard people evoke feminism in this way.
Ex-wives aren't usually the best character references.