LEGO executives obviously agree that something like Flexo doesn't fit the direction LEGO is going. They met with Flexo creators and did not choose to pursue any collaboration or what not.
As for limitations, yes that is part of the charm of LEGO (and why there are LEGO purists). However, another aspect of LEGO charm is doing whatever you want with it including mixing it with anything. I do find the challenge of working within LEGO constraints enjoyable, but I also enjoy working outside of those constraints. Anyway, if something is 100% purely LEGO made, it gets a lot of extra street cred from me.
LEGO does now have a rigorous process to determine if a new part design will be made. So there is some line, but we are only privy to a small part of what it is. I believe it was implemented after the near bankruptcy of LEGO. Seems like plates with studs on both sides is past the line.
I liken Flexo as something along the lines of ball-joints. LEGO has made lots of parts that don't really "fit" the building system. Examples of what I'm talking about are the stuff Ninjago and and Legends of Chima introduced. Spinners, Speedorz, and Airjitzu Flyers were made to add a new play factor. IMO, they are more like a toy that was made compatible with LEGO building system. Like I stated, I liken Flexo as something like ball-joints. Both are highly reusable and add a whole new dynamic to building possibilities and play factor.
As it stands, Flexo if funded will be a 3rd party item and as such won't be considered pure LEGO if used. It will fall in with 3rd party category with the likes of accessories, light bricks, etc.
I look forward to see what is possible with that system.
EDIT: This discussion reminded me of a project that wanted to bridge most of the popular construction systems.
THE FREE UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION KIT
I think this is the
official site.
