First off let me state that I firmly believe that there is a real and pervasive issue with police abuse of power and with conscious / unconscious bias that needs to be addressed. I also believe that this specific incident represents an example of that problem. I've replied with comments to that effect earlier in the thread.
I'd like to address, though, the tenor of our conversation here - specifically the immediate rancor with which people reply to users like patrol.
If anything, this is *exactly* the type of person with a different opinion that would be great to engage in conversation with. He's been respectful, willing to answer questions, etc.
Does patrol's profession make him biased in certain ways? Almost certainly yes.
Can we still learn something from his more "insider" information and experience? Almost certainly yes.
So let's lay down our immediate reaction of disgust. Let's resist the desire to simply categorize him and dismiss him. Let's accept the fact that our respective places in the world color our perceptions, and let's work toward helping each other see beyond those perceptions.
To that end, patrol:
I'm interested in what standard police procedure is when it comes to when to draw your weapon.
What's considered "trigger happy," so to speak, when it comes to simply drawing the weapon?
Also, is there a standard number of officers that should be involved in subduing someone? Or is it just "pile on?"
Have you undergone any unconscious bias training? Do you see such training as valuable?
Given the facts, would you agree that we can't use the claim of the man biting the officer as part of our judgment here?
And finally, in this case, what other approach could the officers have taken with this person?
Thanks!