Sure thing! I may kind of hate this game and what it did to this series, but there's something undeniably comforting to me about hearing someone defend a Metal Gear game's plot.
That said, how to you reconcile Venom's actions towards Quiet in chapter 2? I'm basing this on how these scenes triggered in my game, but it seems super weird that right after the rain cutscene that showed Venom and Quiet growing closer, I almost immediately got the cutscene where Venom is overseeing Quiet's torture via electrocution, and apparently not giving a shit.
These are the kinds of contradictions that make it hard for me to latch on to a coherent character theory of Venom Snake. When he goes to rescue Quiet, is he doing it because he cares for her and that's overriding his sense of self-preservation and safety, or is he doing it because Ocelot convinced him that Quiet is extremely loyal, and she's a useful asset? The fact that those two previous cutscenes exist muddies the waters to the extent that both are equally viable interpretations. The problem is that they have wildly different implications for who Venom is as a character.
A lot of people probably hate this reading, but I think Kojima wrote Venom perfectly to justify contradictions like this.
> spends years becoming near-best soldier in a PMC
> sacrifices self to save his boss (/Boss)
> for 9 years is hypnotised and psychologically manipulated into having the experiences/memories/thoughts of someone else
> wakes up with a different face
> subconsciously
knows something is wrong, that he's not who/what he should be or doing what he should be doing. Is constantly internally at war with himself
> ultimately finds out Zero/BB's plan (end of Truth)
I see his silence, his mixed or apathetic responses and behaviours, as a person who is basically fucked up. You can tell he doesn't quite know how to behave, or can't reconcile what he should or shouldn't do in each situation. The only things he shows conviction about are things which are introduced throughout MGSV itself.
[Edit: Neietro's justification of Venom passing off responsibility to others nearby is really clever and I like that, too. He still has this subconscious training going on all the time - to defer to superiors, etc, but is ostensibly the 'Boss', so is constantly at war with himself. It really shows in how he's written. (Or how he's "not" written.)]
Interesting, this interpretation could also turn Venom's sparing of Huey into a moment of character growth, when Venom finally gets the confidence to challenge Kaz directly, and start acting on his new-found goodness.
Agh! I hate this, because this is legitimately cool character stuff, but I still feel like the game works against itself with the ending. Venom being totally ok with the twist just seems to throw all that out the window. He (following the assumption that Venom is a character) goes through all this growth, and then it's all thrown out so he can fit into the greater plot.
Remember he's
not okay with the twist in the end.
When we see him at the mirror at the end of Truth, listening to the From The Man Who Sold The World tape, he smirks because he sees BB's overarching plan and that he has worked in partner with BB on it. He's happy. Then he turns the tape over and we see the Intrude tape, with Outer Heaven in the background, there's a 10 year time skip, and he is
not happy about how BB abused and manipulated him. He's not happy that ultimately he was a pawn in BB's plan and how he will die at the hands of Solid Snake. Sold down the river by BB in the end, he punches the mirror in rage and turns to meet his fate.