Really good reviews.
Color me surprised.
Usually smaller European games like this don't get a fair break so this must be a super game!
Did you like the first game a lot Dennis? I forget...
I was a really huge fan of the first game... and really could care less how this game plays when played on normal or hard (so a lot of the reviews do not have a large baring on my opinion). Ranger is the only way.
I can imagine they made this game much easier on the normal setting to capture the nubs,
This line's good too:First paragraph is amazing. Hope it makes the OP. Edit: yeeeah
At this point, Metro: Last Light joined a very exclusive club of games that have made me think about what I'm doing with my life.
What's the twitter outrage over Polygon's score? 8.5 too low or something?
really ign? 7.2 after you gave exclusive review resistance 9.5's?
But if you also want tits, QTEs and hand-holding companions, then congratulations - you're part of the wider audience this game is looking for.
4A Games has taken quite the risk with Metro: Last Light. It should be commended by fulfilling its promise to provide a more polished, stable experience (I encountered a grand total of two bugs, and no crashes), but the drastic shift from survival to action will certainly upset some fans of the original. That challenging experience still exists within the Ranger Mode, but this is only available to those who preordered or purchased the special edition version of the game, thus I won’t judge it based on that. Instead, I experienced the game as most people will, on normal difficulty, and it’s something of a breeze, to be honest.
Still, it’s a high calibre first-person shooter, and I enjoyed my time in the metro just a tiny bit more this time around. Would I have preferred more risk and desperation? Of course. And will I be replaying it with Ranger Mode? Inevitably. But, for now, I’m more than content with my journey through Moscow’s underground. Like its older sibling, it stands out from other examples of the genre, and I think there’s something to be said for its avoidance of the familiar and 4A’s attempt to craft something new, again.
Claustrophobic/10
Rofl. Lololol"Tense střelba a inteligentní svět struktura zklamaly matoucí pohlaví mini-hry a nečekané Ellen DeGeneres Show svázat palce. 9.001/10"
- EatChildren.cz
Woah, I didn't write the A/10 review. It was just published at the site I stream for and have acted as part of the community for several years. Thanks for putting it up though
My bad, was playing a game when I saw it get put up so I was half distracted while I was entering it into the OP. Names changed to protect the innocent.
Rev 3 Games review - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH1iykYukNg
LIKES:
Rich, compelling narrative
Astounding level of detail
Highly immersive atmosphere
Top-notch visuals and production
DISLIKES:
Enemy AI can be too forgiving
A few bugs and glitches
SCORE: 4 out of 5
Tara also mentioned disliking that the Ranger mode was $5 dlc
I love rev3, best site out there for reviews. I know they all can't be as good as the Sess, but I wish Tara's reviews didn't sound so....scripted. It just seems like she is reading a script off a piece of paper rather than sharing her thoughts on the game. However, great review and I can't wait to play this this week!
Bring on Ranger mode!
Speaking of that how come the press could not play ranger mode. Press copies did not have this??
Speaking of that how come the press could not play ranger mode. Press copies did not have this??
Some made it sound like they didn't have it available, others said they intentionally left it off because it is being charged for and won't be part of the main package.
\Why is she defending the game so much and talking about it in such exhalted ways? It just looks like a hot scripted mess. I'm not trying to troll, was honestly excited about this game because of the subject matter and Stalker legacy.. but I just can't get over how on-rails it feels.
Did you play Metro 2033? Because it really wasn't anything like STALKER. The quasi-open world emergent gameplay was nowhere to be found. It was very linear, and had plenty of scripted moments. I've always found it funny when people moan about how modern Call of Duty succumbs to follow/wait-for-NPC game design, when Metro 2033 had a ton of moments just like that.
Did you play Metro 2033? Because it really wasn't anything like STALKER. The quasi-open world emergent gameplay was nowhere to be found. It was very linear, and had plenty of scripted moments. I've always found it funny when people moan about how modern Call of Duty succumbs to follow/wait-for-NPC game design, when Metro 2033 had a ton of moments just like that.
So it's safe to assume Metro 2033's less Bioshock in that regard and more Bioshock Infinite then? Not surprising, but kinda disappointing for if I ever bothered to seriously play it.Yeah I have Metro 2033 on Steam, to be honest I knew Last Light was going to go in the same direction, but I'm constantly surprised by how badly I react to game design like this. I tried to give it a chance which is why I was curious for the reviews and playthroughs.. but just like Bioshock Infinite, it seems like I have a huge disconnect with the hype and reception for these games, and my own enjoyment of them.
I am tremendously inspired by the setting and art of this game, but it just isn't for me. :/
Bit late, but: FleshEatingZipper: 7/10. The game is fun, but it has performance issues on PC, even with high-end machiens.
I just put this in...it seems a lot brighter than the first game. Like it's brighter period, but things seem cleaner and stuff. Just find that surprising.