Microsoft is funding “Take Us North” a game about illegal immigration to the US

They're absolutely entitled to make it. And I am entitled not to spend any money on it.

Freedom of speech is needed for speech you don't like, not what you do. That way in the future when you want to say, write or make something unpopular you'll be able to.
Saying "puppy dogs are lovely" isn't going to stir any debate. Saying "I like my country the way it is" certainly will. What side you fall on in that debate is irrelevant. The fact that you can have the debate is what matters.

What nobody is entitled to is to be sheltered from the criticism that comes. You put it out there, don't cry foul when people push back afterwards.
 
Last edited:
This is NOT art... it's political propaganda.

Even as a movie or a TV show it would be the exact same response.... complete fucking derision by everyone outside of the most ardent far left cultists.

Of course it's art, and it can also be propaganda. They aren't mutually exclusive. It's a team of writers tackling an issue and telling a story through their own bias. No doubt they are hoping they can portray it in a way that would make certain people more sympathetic or empathetic towards the issue. Countless movies, books, music, video games exist that do this.

Funny you mention cultists. As someone else mentioned, there are games that already exist or are on the way that take the opposite stance on this or glorify border patrol/ICE agents. You "cultists" weren't up in arms about those games because your roach god didn't make a ragebait video to make money while you caught feelings. It would be sad if we weren't so used to it.

Maybe just don't play the game. AFAIK it's an ID@Xbox indie title. Its not a big deal, people.
 
The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents.
This is factually incorrect. America had a problem with immigrants every time any group came in droves and put pressure on available resources. Ask the Irish. We don't seemingly have a problem now because they are statistically much smaller. And they get deported just like the others. They just don't get as much press and public attention due to them being < 10%.

YfLbsUylMtv79SqB.png



It's racism plain and simple.
It's neither plain nor simple

That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
So more than 50% who voted for this are racists? America certainly has a racism problem. But it's not a racist country. Far less racist than most countries in the world. Which is why it is so racially diverse in the first place. Good luck feeling remotely as accepted in more racially homogeneous countries in Europe, Middle East, Africa or Asia. Out of personal experience, I can assure you that even if they might be nice to me, I would always be an outsider, even if I were born there.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, English is not my first language but propaganda means the same in my language:

information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

War movies are often times proganda. In WW2 days the American government collaborated with Hollywood through the Office of War Information to produce that kind of content. Hell, even since the first world war movies and media were being used to support the effort.

Do you think things happened as portrayed in movies? For example, wouldn't you say it's convenient that the movie Pearl Harbor portrays the Japanese attacking the US just because? Did you know that in reality the US had a blockade in place despite not being actively participating in the war? I think sharing that kind of information is more relevant than seeing a Japanese fleet commander saying "I'm afraid we just woke up a tiger" (or something for that effect) but that would put nuance and show the true complexity of international conflict and invite the audience to go deeper instead of just trying to draw a perfectly clear line of good vs bad.

Other movies like Black Hawk Down (I love it, btw), have been widely critiziced for being pretty much a vehicle of propaganda with direct collaboration of the US government (including script changes and all). If you are honestly interested and have some time read something like this: https://www.researchgate.net/public...tionship_Shaping_Public_Perception_and_Policy

More recently there has been a lot of controversy in China for this movie:



as it shows Japan's attacks in China during WW2 from their own perspective and influencing Chinese people's perception of Japan. Many of those things did happen (don't know the precision as I haven't watched the movie) but that's how an American war movie can seem to foreigners pretty often.

Another, easier to understand example: Disney's The Three Caballeros was funded by the US government to support Roosvelt's "good neighbor policy", as part of an effort to keep Nazi influence out of US' backyard through soft power, you can read a little bit about it here: https://confusingmiddle.com/2025/01/06/disney-07-the-three-caballeros/

Even games have been used as overt war propanda like America's Army which was used as an official army recruitment vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Army

Propaganda is all around us. It's almost impossible to live the lifestyle we have without being exposed it. It helps, however, to know you are dealing with propaganda.

It's part of books, magazines, games, comics, music, movies, tv shows... You name it!

So I haven't played this game and probably never will so I don't know how biased or misleading is but, as many other pieces of media around it may push a political agenda. Is it better or worse when is pushed by the government, by an organization or simply by a person (which many would call art)? Personally, I think there is no difference as to criticize one kind of propaganda while allowing other would only be ignorant. In any case the ideas portrayed in the game or any other piece should be criticized but this pieces do have a place in the world. Trying to draw a line between "acceptable" topics to make media and non acceptable is simply too dangerous and puts the very concept of freedom at risk.

All of Hollywood was/is propaganda. It was created and financed to spread the ideals and strengths of America as a nation, it was a tool of western governmental propaganda to help facilitate the rise and prominence of western civilisation, and to weaken our enemies, so western ideals would spread to those counties, whilst also instilling a sense of nationalism (needed for the various wars). Same with DC/Marcel.

At some point there was a disconnect from any "grand plan" that furthered the actual goals of western civilisation, and it became a tool of far left ideology, often pushing actions that are destructive to those civilisations, whether that's unchecked immigration, unpunished crime, family no longer a virtue, rampant individualism. Etc.
M
No point going back and forth about it, but it's extremely obvious to me this isn't the same as something like a Concord thread where people are clowning on it. They're implying it shouldn't exist as a game, that it's political propaganda. Look at Asmongold reporting the funding to Elon like some CIA informant. Wouldn't even be slightly shocked to see Trump pull some absurd stunt threatening MS until this obscure, totally irrelevant game is canceled. And the secondary point of this is to send a chilling message to everyone else that funding or creating anything like this is clearly off limits. They're not acting like it'll be bad, they're acting like it shouldn't exist. Obviously.
I fear this thread is starting to devolve into a politics thread.

But my perspective, it is 100% political propaganda. If it was about a game or telling a story, they would have shown that and focussed on showing the game, but they got so wrapped up with political preaching that they forgot to show the trailer and were rushed off the stage having run out of time. You couldn't get a clearer example of where their priorities were. It was clearly also only telling one side of it.

I'm a British centrist and this was clear as day and off putting, whilst seeming to be encouraging illegal immigration. What you're seeing in things like asmongolds video is the even stronger feelings of how people actually on the right feel about this (who are 50% of the U.S.).

To get an idea of how ridiculous it is, just flip the script in regards ideological priorities.

It's now not a game about crossing the border, instead it's a game about shutting down abortion clinics. It's financed by google, press say how brave they are and how it's good to see google taking a stand. They are given 30 mins to show it off at a major conference, where the crowd say "fuck the child killers" and the dev responds "too right!". The devs instead of showing the game proceed to talk about the pain of foetus's, they show lots of clips of pastors saying people will burn in hell, crying mothers, and footage of procedures. Then forget to show the game itself.

That would be ridiculous and offensive right?It would be straight up ideological political propaganda, wildly inappropriate, and whilst it can exist in a free society, it's definitely problematic, and it sure as hell shouldn't be funded by google, and people would be well within their rights to critique it with the language that is being used to critique this game.

Again, that's not to say there's not interesting stories you could tell related to either topic, but this sure as shit wouldn't be the way to do it.
 
It's just another one of "those" games. If it was released, it would appeal to a select amount of people that would view it as art. May or may not enjoy it, and move on. That's really it. I don't see the problem in stuff like this existing as we've already had various forms of these types of indies coming to light. They just come and go. I feel like the whole ID @ Microsoft titles have been filled with titles that are very "art driven", so something like this doesn't surprise me. In today's climate though, I don't know what kind of reaction they expected.

Also, them cancelling titles and still supporting something like this isn't saying a whole lot. Especially when you're talking about extremely expensive AAA titles, and stuff that's chump change to them that they think will make them potentially look better in the eyes of indie developers that want/need support. At least that's what I'm thinking.

Also, Pirat_Nation and Asmongold on the first post? Come on man, lmao. I wish we'd stop seeing baiters and grifters shared here.
 
Last edited:
Also, them cancelling titles and still supporting something like this isn't saying a whole lot. Especially when you're talking about extremely expensive AAA titles, and stuff that's chump change to them that they think will make them potentially look better in the eyes of indie developers that want/need support. At least that's what I'm thinking.
The optics are bad.
 
The optics are bad.
Let's be fair, there's a lot that's going on at Microsoft that is beyond questionable, and that's been widely apparent. But their ID @ Microsoft titles have always kind of been this and similar for a long, long time.
 
Last edited:
Let's be fair, there's a lot that's going on at Microsoft that is beyond questionable, and that's been widely apparent. But their ID @ Microsoft titles have always kind of been this and similar for a long, long time.
There's always room for improvement. Especially with Xbox's current position in the market. Canceling games people want while associating with slop like this does not grow their business.
 
There's always room for improvement. Especially with Xbox's current position in the market. Canceling games people want while associating with slop like this does not grow their business.
Of course, but that's definitely something that's not just going to happen overnight. I think it's beyond clear they need to restructure and reevaluate their approach. The timing of this all just felt bizarre and tone deaf, but their behavior has been odd for awhile now.
 
No opportunity is lost to engage in silly platform warring, I see.

Microsoft isn't making this game, they aren't publishing this game, and won't even benefit significantly from sales numbers since it'll most likely launch on all platforms. Their financial involvement seems to be via ID@Xbox and most likely will see this show up in GamePass and be a Play Anywhere title.
If you paid attention to my posts you would see there's no platform warring here. I dish it out to all of the big three.

Nintendo loves the smell of their own farts and has priced a lot of people out of their ecosystem, including me. Sony made a 5 billion dollar mistake chasing GaaS, and Microsoft has no viable business model and hasn't had one since 2013.

You would think I'm a PC gamer because I basically have nothing bad to say about Steam except I find PC gaming expensive and uncomfortable for me because I sit at a desk all day for work.
 
Last edited:
The differing amount of people each with their own specific motivations for crossing over illegally offers a lot of interesting stories to tell in ways we don't typically get to see. A game doesn't necessarily need to adhere to morality or the law for it to be enjoyable as we've seen with countless other titles already notably one that's about to be biggest launch ever.

I don't mind a game being political - people are, so naturally some of that will be in the stories they create. The question is how narratively nuanced they can make it without it just being an obnoxious sledgehammer. Hopefully they can pull it off.
 
Yeah, English is not my first language but propaganda means the same in my language:

information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

War movies are often times proganda. In WW2 days the American government collaborated with Hollywood through the Office of War Information to produce that kind of content. Hell, even since the first world war movies and media were being used to support the effort.

Do you think things happened as portrayed in movies? For example, wouldn't you say it's convenient that the movie Pearl Harbor portrays the Japanese attacking the US just because? Did you know that in reality the US had a blockade in place despite not being actively participating in the war? I think sharing that kind of information is more relevant than seeing a Japanese fleet commander saying "I'm afraid we just woke up a tiger" (or something for that effect) but that would put nuance and show the true complexity of international conflict and invite the audience to go deeper instead of just trying to draw a perfectly clear line of good vs bad.

Other movies like Black Hawk Down (I love it, btw), have been widely critiziced for being pretty much a vehicle of propaganda with direct collaboration of the US government (including script changes and all). If you are honestly interested and have some time read something like this: https://www.researchgate.net/public...tionship_Shaping_Public_Perception_and_Policy

More recently there has been a lot of controversy in China for this movie:



as it shows Japan's attacks in China during WW2 from their own perspective and influencing Chinese people's perception of Japan. Many of those things did happen (don't know the precision as I haven't watched the movie) but that's how an American war movie can seem to foreigners pretty often.

Another, easier to understand example: Disney's The Three Caballeros was funded by the US government to support Roosvelt's "good neighbor policy", as part of an effort to keep Nazi influence out of US' backyard through soft power, you can read a little bit about it here: https://confusingmiddle.com/2025/01/06/disney-07-the-three-caballeros/

Even games have been used as overt war propanda like America's Army which was used as an official army recruitment vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Army

Propaganda is all around us. It's almost impossible to live the lifestyle we have without being exposed it. It helps, however, to know you are dealing with propaganda.

It's part of books, magazines, games, comics, music, movies, tv shows... You name it!

So I haven't played this game and probably never will so I don't know how biased or misleading is but, as many other pieces of media around it may push a political agenda. Is it better or worse when is pushed by the government, by an organization or simply by a person (which many would call art)? Personally, I think there is no difference as to criticize one kind of propaganda while allowing other would only be ignorant. In any case the ideas portrayed in the game or any other piece should be criticized but this pieces do have a place in the world. Trying to draw a line between "acceptable" topics to make media and non acceptable is simply too dangerous and puts the very concept of freedom at risk.


Propaganda might be all around us. But that neither makes it art nor does it make it worthwhile.

What are you even arguing? That because something is ubiquitous, it's somehow good?
 
Of all the things they cancelled, this wasn't one of it? Dafuq?
You have to factor in the game's budget.
This one cost one Jean Paul II shirt (which looks killer by the way), two packs of batteries, half a tube of toothpaste, a pair of leather diesel jeans, pork chop flavored chips, granma's tortillas, a spoiled banana and of course clotrimazole*

central-american-migrants-11.jpg


At least according to my source

*Clotrimazole : Azoles (e.g., Clotrimazole) are generally recommended for the local treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis characterized by vulvovaginal symptoms such as itching, burning, discharge, redness, swelling, and pain. (from the French public medication database)
 
Last edited:
Of course it's art, and it can also be propaganda. They aren't mutually exclusive. It's a team of writers tackling an issue and telling a story through their own bias. No doubt they are hoping they can portray it in a way that would make certain people more sympathetic or empathetic towards the issue. Countless movies, books, music, video games exist that do this.

Funny you mention cultists. As someone else mentioned, there are games that already exist or are on the way that take the opposite stance on this or glorify border patrol/ICE agents. You "cultists" weren't up in arms about those games because your roach god didn't make a ragebait video to make money while you caught feelings. It would be sad if we weren't so used to it.

Maybe just don't play the game. AFAIK it's an ID@Xbox indie title. Its not a big deal, people.

If you think propaganda is art then you're probably enslaved to ideology and you clearly have no taste.

Propaganda isn't art. Art exists to speak to and/or move the human soul. Propaganda is soulless horseshit that exists to serve a political agenda. Propaganda has no artistic value at all. It's frankly fucking laughable to suggest otherwise.
 
The optics are bad.
Nah. I think Microsoft's role in this is being blown out of proportion.

I actually don't mind games exploring this topic. I would even applaud it. But given the team and their seeming obsession with identity, I don't expect much more than a one-sided melodrama that demonizes the other side. There will likely be no new ground that hundreds of great and terrible documentaries have not already covered.

So... it's just... a whatever fart in the wind that generates a bunch of noise and then will be long forgotten 🤷‍♂️
 
I don't care about the game. I care about how the people making it affect the rest of the industry. For more than 10 years these people are trying to censor and cancel any project or dev that doesn't follow their agenda. They have also infiltrated existing studios who handle old, classic franchises in order to change them from within. This particular woman is also workign with Sweet Baby and we all know what that fucking studio does. They are not making games, they are trying to change games other devs are making, using blackmail tactics.


The difference with the movie industry is that the activists haven't managed to damage it as much or completely change it to their will yet. It's much harder to cancel someone like Tarantino, who mostly works for himself. It's not like a Sweet Baby studio for movies would be able to make him change his work. There are still a lot of big/known movie directors who work for themselves but not many equivalents in the gaming industry, like how Kojima has his own studio and can make whatever game he wants and doesn't care.
What I understood from what you are saying you are OK with the kind of propaganda that aligns to your views but not something different and that's alright but propaganda is propaganda. Some of it is state sponsored like Hollywood and some of it comes from other sources.

Hollywood has been considered a liberal propaganda machine for quite a while, specially considering how many A listers directly participate in activism that would be considered leftist (Dicaprio, Clooney, etc).

I respect your decision of not playing it, I will probably won't play it myself but as with any other game I think the world would be worse if it didn't exist. To me it's more important for the medium to become a full fledged medium for expression, even if I don't like everything they put out or play it.

When talking about movies Tarantino and the rest of high exposure directors are not the ones putting forward subversive or propagandistic material out there. Most people don't even know what's out there because nobody cares. Only in gaming people feel there is people that feel that only the games about ideas they approve should exist (and I'm taking about both sides of the spectrum).

15 years ago nobody would have cared this game exists.
 
The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents. It's racism plain and simple. That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
I'm pretty sure everyone cares about that too. Don't even get me started on the British coming over here with their tea and slop food.
 
I'm fine with allowing them to have their game. Freedom is scary, yo.

They are not fine with allowing me to have my game.

That's why I'm morally superior.

I don't want your horrible unpopular garbage to be censored, but you will fight with all your power to censor mine. We are not the same.

L E T T H E M A R K E T D E C I D E
 
Last edited:
Nah. I think Microsoft's role in this is being blown out of proportion.
Strongly disagree. Companies are very particular about what they choose to associate with. They paid people to seek this game out and make a business deal. Who are they? What value are they adding? I'm sure there are better indies worthy of funding.
 
If you think propaganda is art then you're probably enslaved to ideology and you clearly have no taste.

Propaganda isn't art. Art exists to speak to and/or move the human soul. Propaganda is soulless horseshit that exists to serve a political agenda. Propaganda has no artistic value at all. It's frankly fucking laughable to suggest otherwise.

I see the problem, you think you know what propaganda is but you're too deep in political bullshit to know your ass from your ears. Carry on, make your roach king proud.
 
Propaganda might be all around us. But that neither makes it art nor does it make it worthwhile.

What are you even arguing? That because something is ubiquitous, it's somehow good?
I'm just saying that people react to this viscerally. I'm saying that nobody can judge what should be released and what not, censorship is bad all around not only when it's about shit we don't like. I don't particularly care for this game but I do care of gaming being recognized as medium just as important as any other media. I'm not cool with censorship, even when it's aligned to my particular world view.

And also felt like helping you out identifying how movies are full of propaganda.
 
Disgusting, pure propaganda. They cut a shitload of jobs, yet they apparently have money to fund this shit.

The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents. It's racism plain and simple. That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.

A comment this stupid should be a bannable offense. Show me the articles of the white illegals murdering and raping US citizens, because I can show you plenty from latin American illegals. I won't hold my breath.

It's not about skin color it's about culture and values. When people from third world countries immigrate (illegally or not) to the US or Europe, a lot of them don't make efforts to adapt and integrate and just replicate the behaviors they're used to. A lot of them are bad people to begin with, people who were already criminals in their home country (like cartel members). They take advantage of our lax justice systems that portray them as victims instead of perpetrators. This is why native populations are upset, not because they have darker skin. In the UK, natives aren't upset with Pakistani immigrants because of their skin color, it's because they're gangraping kids. The UK has a lot of Polish immigrants and yet I never see any reports of Polish men gangraping kids. So while it might look like people don't care about white illegals, it more of a case that they represent far less of a threat because there's a good chance they share western culture and values. But not only whites, people probably wouldn't care much about Japanese or Korean illegals, because those nations have similar values. Of course there can be bad apples amongst 1st world immigrants and plenty of 3rd world immigrants are decent people just trying to obtain a better life for themselves and their family but that's why it's important to have closed borders and a strict vetting process so you can let the good people in, and tell the bad ones to go fuck themselves.

My guess is that you haven't traveled much because if you had, you would know that white people are among the least racist/tribal people. Instead, you just regurgitate the propaganda that was fed to you. If you had an intruder illegally enter your home, you'd want them gone would you not? Even if you invited them in, if they suddenly attacked you or your family, you would want them gone, right? That's not racism or xenophobia, it's common sense and survival instinct.
 
Lotta Trump fanatics in this thread. Thought politics were not allowed? As for the game, who gives a shit, we received far worse/weirder indies over the years and it'll be forgotten just like the rest unless you make a big deal out of it, which some of you are doing. Ignorance is bliss.
 
Strongly disagree. Companies are very particular about what they choose to associate with. They paid people to seek this game out and make a business deal. Who are they? What value are they adding? I'm sure there are better indies worthy of funding.
They do these programs for literally hundreds of projects. Some that are woke and many that are not. And Microsoft is as woke as they come. I'm not saying this isn't driven by an agenda. It's just par for the course. I just don't want this to sound like Microsoft has some ulterior motive to bring this project to life through an Indie so that they can be layers removed from it, while funding it and influencing public discourse. Their motivations are pretty transparent. A project like this would naturally fit their DEI initiatives. It gets an eyeroll at best. The market will decide if it's worth the asking price.

In the extremely unlikely event that the game is actually thought provoking and gives a fresh perspective (it won't, but just saying) on an ongoing issue that affects millions , it has every right to exist as any other game, including that sick "rape simulator". Rate it accordingly and voice against it. But there's no need to ban it. Sensible folk will vote with their wallets anyway. I'm a free speech absolutist and would have it no other way.

The only thing cancel culture needs to do is cancel itself.
 
Last edited:
Lotta Trump fanatics in this thread. Thought politics were not allowed? As for the game, who gives a shit, we received far worse/weirder indies over the years and it'll be forgotten just like the rest unless you make a big deal out of it, which some of you are doing. Ignorance is bliss.
Basically what I was saying. ID @ Microsoft has been connected to similar indies and others that are more abstract, artistic, etc. Even ones that revolve around other cultures, are personal stories and experiences, etc. Other titles that people never called "propaganda", lmao. Regardless, I'm sure it's an extremely cheap thing for Microsoft to partake in, and it makes them look good to be helping indie developers get their projects off the ground and/or be seen. The only reason this is getting so much "attention" is because of the game's topic, and folks are making it a larger "issue" than it is. I hate our timeline, lmao.
 
Last edited:
See? These are the things that really hurt the migrants that actually just want to work and adapt, these types of actions and also defending criminals only alienates people against them more and more because they put them all in the same bag, I say this as a former illegal immigrant, it's difficult enough already and all they do is make life harder for us all
 
I'm just saying that people react to this viscerally. I'm saying that nobody can judge what should be released and what not, censorship is bad all around not only when it's about shit we don't like. I don't particularly care for this game but I do care of gaming being recognized as medium just as important as any other media. I'm not cool with censorship, even when it's aligned to my particular world view.

And also felt like helping you out identifying how movies are full of propaganda.

Why are you talking about censorship?

Who is trying to censor anything? The way some of you guys jump to absurd conclusions when trying to debate is fucking wild.
 
I hate our timeline, lmao.
And I love it! Which other timeline could we even openly talk about anything from every possible angle? We have at least reached a point where almost no one is afraid to voice an opinion on issues that don't directly affect them. We still have a ways to go when it does affect them, but at least the woke and the anti-woke are emboldened to say their piece. This wasn't quite happening a few years ago.

First step towards understanding is open debate. Without that, we would all sit in our closed boxes with closed minds, screaming about why life is so unfair.
 
Honestly at least this is nowhere near as bad as if they were to instead make a game that's trying to push all those insane ideas with a dozen genders or something.

Born in the U.S and I'm not even hispanic/brown but I still have empathy for migrants even if they aren't here legally for those that don't commit crime like robbing/raping/harassing the other people in the country. A lot seems to be families trying to get by and work hard. It sucks to see ICE breaking up the ones who don't commit crime. And I don't think this problem was ever that big of a deal in the 80s and 90s.

The mexican/hispanic migrants in the U.S seems way better and safe compared to the migrants thats flooding into European countries where a lot of their groups mostly contain young man instead of woman and children and how they turn some areas in european cities into no go zones where even the cops are too scared to go into. These seems to have a more hidden agenda compared to the hispanic migrants which are just trying to get by.
 
Last edited:
It's kind of awesome that there are people willing to make games based on sensitive, complicated sociopolitical topics. It's possible they made it purely to get attention or be provocative, but tbh it looks more like an invitation to get a bit more in-depth look at the issue. I know, I will definitely look at it when it comes out.
 
Ok, so you have no argument.

I figured as much. I'm not wasting anymore of my precious time on you.

My argument is the English language. Propaganda isn't exclusive to politics. Like I said, you are just too far gone on the political end. Even the idea of immigration itself, something the US was founded on and continues to be a pillar of the country, is something you've reduced to political nonsense because your favorite grifters have conditioned it so.

Again, would be sad if it wasn't so cliche nowadays. "Cultists" 😆😆😆
 
It's good that you accept reality unlike the idiots above. And Idk how Hispanic farm workers and waiters are such a problem that we need to send them to concentration camps. I think immigration should be regulated(and it is or we'd have WAY more illegal immigrants), but let's be real, the ones signing up to work for ICE and feeling giddy about tearing families apart are mostly racists assholes.

We don't need to send them to concentration camps, we need to send them anywhere else besides our country. Of course people who want to see them gone are going to sign up for ICE. You can call them racist all you want, but it's not just white Americans signing up for ICE.

They want us fighting like this amongst ourselves to put wool over our eyes to the real issue in this country. Greed.

Who is *they* and how do you solve for human greed?
 
Top Bottom