This is NOT art... it's political propaganda.
Even as a movie or a TV show it would be the exact same response.... complete fucking derision by everyone outside of the most ardent far left cultists.
This is factually incorrect. America had a problem with immigrants every time any group came in droves and put pressure on available resources. Ask the Irish. We don't seemingly have a problem now because they are statistically much smaller. And they get deported just like the others. They just don't get as much press and public attention due to them being < 10%.The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents.
It's neither plain nor simpleIt's racism plain and simple.
So more than 50% who voted for this are racists? America certainly has a racism problem. But it's not a racist country. Far less racist than most countries in the world. Which is why it is so racially diverse in the first place. Good luck feeling remotely as accepted in more racially homogeneous countries in Europe, Middle East, Africa or Asia. Out of personal experience, I can assure you that even if they might be nice to me, I would always be an outsider, even if I were born there.That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
Yeah, English is not my first language but propaganda means the same in my language:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
War movies are often times proganda. In WW2 days the American government collaborated with Hollywood through the Office of War Information to produce that kind of content. Hell, even since the first world war movies and media were being used to support the effort.
Do you think things happened as portrayed in movies? For example, wouldn't you say it's convenient that the movie Pearl Harbor portrays the Japanese attacking the US just because? Did you know that in reality the US had a blockade in place despite not being actively participating in the war? I think sharing that kind of information is more relevant than seeing a Japanese fleet commander saying "I'm afraid we just woke up a tiger" (or something for that effect) but that would put nuance and show the true complexity of international conflict and invite the audience to go deeper instead of just trying to draw a perfectly clear line of good vs bad.
Other movies like Black Hawk Down (I love it, btw), have been widely critiziced for being pretty much a vehicle of propaganda with direct collaboration of the US government (including script changes and all). If you are honestly interested and have some time read something like this: https://www.researchgate.net/public...tionship_Shaping_Public_Perception_and_Policy
More recently there has been a lot of controversy in China for this movie:
as it shows Japan's attacks in China during WW2 from their own perspective and influencing Chinese people's perception of Japan. Many of those things did happen (don't know the precision as I haven't watched the movie) but that's how an American war movie can seem to foreigners pretty often.
Another, easier to understand example: Disney's The Three Caballeros was funded by the US government to support Roosvelt's "good neighbor policy", as part of an effort to keep Nazi influence out of US' backyard through soft power, you can read a little bit about it here: https://confusingmiddle.com/2025/01/06/disney-07-the-three-caballeros/
Even games have been used as overt war propanda like America's Army which was used as an official army recruitment vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Army
Propaganda is all around us. It's almost impossible to live the lifestyle we have without being exposed it. It helps, however, to know you are dealing with propaganda.
It's part of books, magazines, games, comics, music, movies, tv shows... You name it!
So I haven't played this game and probably never will so I don't know how biased or misleading is but, as many other pieces of media around it may push a political agenda. Is it better or worse when is pushed by the government, by an organization or simply by a person (which many would call art)? Personally, I think there is no difference as to criticize one kind of propaganda while allowing other would only be ignorant. In any case the ideas portrayed in the game or any other piece should be criticized but this pieces do have a place in the world. Trying to draw a line between "acceptable" topics to make media and non acceptable is simply too dangerous and puts the very concept of freedom at risk.
I fear this thread is starting to devolve into a politics thread.No point going back and forth about it, but it's extremely obvious to me this isn't the same as something like a Concord thread where people are clowning on it. They're implying it shouldn't exist as a game, that it's political propaganda. Look at Asmongold reporting the funding to Elon like some CIA informant. Wouldn't even be slightly shocked to see Trump pull some absurd stunt threatening MS until this obscure, totally irrelevant game is canceled. And the secondary point of this is to send a chilling message to everyone else that funding or creating anything like this is clearly off limits. They're not acting like it'll be bad, they're acting like it shouldn't exist. Obviously.
Exactly. Let's cancel Perfect Dark but keep this pish. tf are they smokingOf all the things they cancelled, this wasn't one of it? Dafuq?
The optics are bad.Also, them cancelling titles and still supporting something like this isn't saying a whole lot. Especially when you're talking about extremely expensive AAA titles, and stuff that's chump change to them that they think will make them potentially look better in the eyes of indie developers that want/need support. At least that's what I'm thinking.
Let's be fair, there's a lot that's going on at Microsoft that is beyond questionable, and that's been widely apparent. But their ID @ Microsoft titles have always kind of been this and similar for a long, long time.The optics are bad.
There's always room for improvement. Especially with Xbox's current position in the market. Canceling games people want while associating with slop like this does not grow their business.Let's be fair, there's a lot that's going on at Microsoft that is beyond questionable, and that's been widely apparent. But their ID @ Microsoft titles have always kind of been this and similar for a long, long time.
Of course, but that's definitely something that's not just going to happen overnight. I think it's beyond clear they need to restructure and reevaluate their approach. The timing of this all just felt bizarre and tone deaf, but their behavior has been odd for awhile now.There's always room for improvement. Especially with Xbox's current position in the market. Canceling games people want while associating with slop like this does not grow their business.
If you paid attention to my posts you would see there's no platform warring here. I dish it out to all of the big three.No opportunity is lost to engage in silly platform warring, I see.
Microsoft isn't making this game, they aren't publishing this game, and won't even benefit significantly from sales numbers since it'll most likely launch on all platforms. Their financial involvement seems to be via ID@Xbox and most likely will see this show up in GamePass and be a Play Anywhere title.
Yeah, English is not my first language but propaganda means the same in my language:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
War movies are often times proganda. In WW2 days the American government collaborated with Hollywood through the Office of War Information to produce that kind of content. Hell, even since the first world war movies and media were being used to support the effort.
Do you think things happened as portrayed in movies? For example, wouldn't you say it's convenient that the movie Pearl Harbor portrays the Japanese attacking the US just because? Did you know that in reality the US had a blockade in place despite not being actively participating in the war? I think sharing that kind of information is more relevant than seeing a Japanese fleet commander saying "I'm afraid we just woke up a tiger" (or something for that effect) but that would put nuance and show the true complexity of international conflict and invite the audience to go deeper instead of just trying to draw a perfectly clear line of good vs bad.
Other movies like Black Hawk Down (I love it, btw), have been widely critiziced for being pretty much a vehicle of propaganda with direct collaboration of the US government (including script changes and all). If you are honestly interested and have some time read something like this: https://www.researchgate.net/public...tionship_Shaping_Public_Perception_and_Policy
More recently there has been a lot of controversy in China for this movie:
as it shows Japan's attacks in China during WW2 from their own perspective and influencing Chinese people's perception of Japan. Many of those things did happen (don't know the precision as I haven't watched the movie) but that's how an American war movie can seem to foreigners pretty often.
Another, easier to understand example: Disney's The Three Caballeros was funded by the US government to support Roosvelt's "good neighbor policy", as part of an effort to keep Nazi influence out of US' backyard through soft power, you can read a little bit about it here: https://confusingmiddle.com/2025/01/06/disney-07-the-three-caballeros/
Even games have been used as overt war propanda like America's Army which was used as an official army recruitment vehicle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Army
Propaganda is all around us. It's almost impossible to live the lifestyle we have without being exposed it. It helps, however, to know you are dealing with propaganda.
It's part of books, magazines, games, comics, music, movies, tv shows... You name it!
So I haven't played this game and probably never will so I don't know how biased or misleading is but, as many other pieces of media around it may push a political agenda. Is it better or worse when is pushed by the government, by an organization or simply by a person (which many would call art)? Personally, I think there is no difference as to criticize one kind of propaganda while allowing other would only be ignorant. In any case the ideas portrayed in the game or any other piece should be criticized but this pieces do have a place in the world. Trying to draw a line between "acceptable" topics to make media and non acceptable is simply too dangerous and puts the very concept of freedom at risk.
You have to factor in the game's budget.Of all the things they cancelled, this wasn't one of it? Dafuq?
Of course it's art, and it can also be propaganda. They aren't mutually exclusive. It's a team of writers tackling an issue and telling a story through their own bias. No doubt they are hoping they can portray it in a way that would make certain people more sympathetic or empathetic towards the issue. Countless movies, books, music, video games exist that do this.
Funny you mention cultists. As someone else mentioned, there are games that already exist or are on the way that take the opposite stance on this or glorify border patrol/ICE agents. You "cultists" weren't up in arms about those games because your roach god didn't make a ragebait video to make money while you caught feelings. It would be sad if we weren't so used to it.
Maybe just don't play the game. AFAIK it's an ID@Xbox indie title. Its not a big deal, people.
Nah. I think Microsoft's role in this is being blown out of proportion.The optics are bad.
What I understood from what you are saying you are OK with the kind of propaganda that aligns to your views but not something different and that's alright but propaganda is propaganda. Some of it is state sponsored like Hollywood and some of it comes from other sources.I don't care about the game. I care about how the people making it affect the rest of the industry. For more than 10 years these people are trying to censor and cancel any project or dev that doesn't follow their agenda. They have also infiltrated existing studios who handle old, classic franchises in order to change them from within. This particular woman is also workign with Sweet Baby and we all know what that fucking studio does. They are not making games, they are trying to change games other devs are making, using blackmail tactics.
The difference with the movie industry is that the activists haven't managed to damage it as much or completely change it to their will yet. It's much harder to cancel someone like Tarantino, who mostly works for himself. It's not like a Sweet Baby studio for movies would be able to make him change his work. There are still a lot of big/known movie directors who work for themselves but not many equivalents in the gaming industry, like how Kojima has his own studio and can make whatever game he wants and doesn't care.
I'm pretty sure everyone cares about that too. Don't even get me started on the British coming over here with their tea and slop food.The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents. It's racism plain and simple. That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
Strongly disagree. Companies are very particular about what they choose to associate with. They paid people to seek this game out and make a business deal. Who are they? What value are they adding? I'm sure there are better indies worthy of funding.Nah. I think Microsoft's role in this is being blown out of proportion.
If you think propaganda is art then you're probably enslaved to ideology and you clearly have no taste.
Propaganda isn't art. Art exists to speak to and/or move the human soul. Propaganda is soulless horseshit that exists to serve a political agenda. Propaganda has no artistic value at all. It's frankly fucking laughable to suggest otherwise.
I'm just saying that people react to this viscerally. I'm saying that nobody can judge what should be released and what not, censorship is bad all around not only when it's about shit we don't like. I don't particularly care for this game but I do care of gaming being recognized as medium just as important as any other media. I'm not cool with censorship, even when it's aligned to my particular world view.Propaganda might be all around us. But that neither makes it art nor does it make it worthwhile.
What are you even arguing? That because something is ubiquitous, it's somehow good?
The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents. It's racism plain and simple. That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
The thing is, no one cares when it is white people. No one would bat an eye about Canadians or white Europeans being here without documents. It's racism plain and simple. That's why the roach king and other racists care so much.
I see the problem, you think you know what propaganda is but you're too deep in political bullshit to know your ass from your ears. Carry on, make your roach king proud.
They do these programs for literally hundreds of projects. Some that are woke and many that are not. And Microsoft is as woke as they come. I'm not saying this isn't driven by an agenda. It's just par for the course. I just don't want this to sound like Microsoft has some ulterior motive to bring this project to life through an Indie so that they can be layers removed from it, while funding it and influencing public discourse. Their motivations are pretty transparent. A project like this would naturally fit their DEI initiatives. It gets an eyeroll at best. The market will decide if it's worth the asking price.Strongly disagree. Companies are very particular about what they choose to associate with. They paid people to seek this game out and make a business deal. Who are they? What value are they adding? I'm sure there are better indies worthy of funding.
Basically what I was saying. ID @ Microsoft has been connected to similar indies and others that are more abstract, artistic, etc. Even ones that revolve around other cultures, are personal stories and experiences, etc. Other titles that people never called "propaganda", lmao. Regardless, I'm sure it's an extremely cheap thing for Microsoft to partake in, and it makes them look good to be helping indie developers get their projects off the ground and/or be seen. The only reason this is getting so much "attention" is because of the game's topic, and folks are making it a larger "issue" than it is. I hate our timeline, lmao.Lotta Trump fanatics in this thread. Thought politics were not allowed? As for the game, who gives a shit, we received far worse/weirder indies over the years and it'll be forgotten just like the rest unless you make a big deal out of it, which some of you are doing. Ignorance is bliss.
You don't wanna switch from peanut butter and jelly toast to beans on toast?I'm pretty sure everyone cares about that too. Don't even get me started on the British coming over here with their tea and slop food.
I'm just saying that people react to this viscerally. I'm saying that nobody can judge what should be released and what not, censorship is bad all around not only when it's about shit we don't like. I don't particularly care for this game but I do care of gaming being recognized as medium just as important as any other media. I'm not cool with censorship, even when it's aligned to my particular world view.
And also felt like helping you out identifying how movies are full of propaganda.
Ok, so you have no argument.I see the problem, you think you know what propaganda is but you're too deep in political bullshit to know your ass from your ears. Carry on, make your roach king proud.
And I love it! Which other timeline could we even openly talk about anything from every possible angle? We have at least reached a point where almost no one is afraid to voice an opinion on issues that don't directly affect them. We still have a ways to go when it does affect them, but at least the woke and the anti-woke are emboldened to say their piece. This wasn't quite happening a few years ago.I hate our timeline, lmao.
It's no different than people criticizing Sony for their GAAS slop. No one says it doesn't have the right to exist.it has every right to exist as any other game
Wake me up when Microsoft starts funding incest games or Visa starts pressuring Steam to stop selling woke games. These things are not comparable.including that sick "rape simulator"
Ok, so you have no argument.
I figured as much. I'm not wasting anymore of my precious time on you.
It's good that you accept reality unlike the idiots above. And Idk how Hispanic farm workers and waiters are such a problem that we need to send them to concentration camps. I think immigration should be regulated(and it is or we'd have WAY more illegal immigrants), but let's be real, the ones signing up to work for ICE and feeling giddy about tearing families apart are mostly racists assholes.
They want us fighting like this amongst ourselves to put wool over our eyes to the real issue in this country. Greed.