ghostwritingduck
Member
Again, when your only evidence is two testimonies (after posting a $10,000 reward), and a victims items, that's not much of a case. Testimonies are made to fit the crime by police interrogators all the time, and there is some speculation that this was the case even here. If you look at all the physical evidence, including multiple DNA sources and his footprints, and none of it points to him being the one to commit the murder (and rather an unspecified third party), that is not enough evidence to convict him.
Granted, that DNA testing wasn't available at the time, but if it was, I would have voted to acquit, because it absolutely does not constitute an overwhelming preponderance of evidence. Certainly, if we're going to kill someone at all (and I'm of the opinion the death penalty is never warranted), every bit of evidence has to show their guilt, and that isn't true in this case whatsoever.
Death penalty is messed up for all sorts of reasons including false convictions, but I feel comfortable saying he was responsible beyond reasonable doubt.
Two seperate people knowing unpublished specifics about the murder and Marcellus having the victims possessions only makes sense if you're going to argue that they were the actual murderers and planted the evidence to collect $10,000 years later. You can't even blame the police since the husbands laptop was missing before they even got there.