He learned to use that when it doesn't apply from Fox News.
You can say fuck movie reviews all you want pasty, truth is they reflect movie quality and word of mouth more often than not.
Avengers has a 92% on RT, and 1.5B at the box office. There's no way to twist it, people loved that movie.
i was reading the Man of Steel thread and Blade has like, a mid 50% rating on that Rotten Tomato site.
if there's evidence critics don't know shit, it's right there, cause Blade is grade A stuff.
The blade movies are grade a shit.
Because it kids, teens and manchilds still like to see Big Robots throwing down and Michael Bay knows just the right style to make it shiny.
There's nothing to it, Transformers success isn't like "incomprehensible". For example, if On Stranger Tides was the first movie in the franchise and it had done 1b, then it would be incomprehensible because really, almost everybody thought it was a shit movie.
Critics get it wrong all the time? I don't see that.
All the time = Movies released before you were born?
I rest my case.
Those are the two biggest. A lot of the 80's action flicks that are loved now were shit on back in the 80's. However if you want recent:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_iii_revenge_of_the_sith_3d/
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thor/
Both shit movies that were sold off of hype. Just pay attention to the media before these big movies are released. No movie that is as ugly and boring as Thor should have any good reviews.
I liked Watchmen and 300 so I'll give it a shot.Jerry what's more likely?
Option 1 or 2
1) A nationwide conspiracy to give the new Superman movie poor ratings because they're out to get WB/DC Comics.
Or
2) A Zach Snyder movie being an attractively shot piece of shit?
How many of those are a good marketing campaign? Look at the new star trek. It didn't hit it's mark and the marketing was blamed. Movies are sold off marketing. Now explain Transformers? Explain the Resident Evil movies? All critically panned. Still make money. Who was wrong about the movie? The masses that flocked to see them or the critics or is it the marketing telling them to go see the movie? There are whole areas of study about how well marketing works. If something bombs than the marketing company did something wrong. Read this. A book on marketing and the psychology behind it.That's why the connected world is so great, and sites like RT can give a much better evaluation of general opinion than it was possible before.
Which is why picking up movies from 30 years ago to prove critics don't know shit is just mind boggling. Check IMDB, check RT, check box office, check week to week drops.
"Viewers will watch anything they are told to", welcome to fallacious arguments 101. Viewers will watch ideas they are sold on. Or a simple look at big budget bombs from the last three years, is more than enough for that argument to fall apart like a house of cards.
It's all about indicators, and critics are a valid and good indicator of a movie's general quality, with standard margins of error.
Cognitive Dissonance says we can align our beliefs with something even if it doesn't suit us. Read the link. It isn't about the industry. It's about the critics and how they are often wrong.We will always align our beliefs with what suits us anyway, truth is for most people the opinions of others only matter when they align with our own. And articles about the failing state of an "industry" are a dime a dozen every decade playboy, no need to wave them around like they mean shit.
Jerry what's more likely?
Option 1 or 2
1) A nationwide conspiracy to give the new Superman movie poor ratings because they're out to get WB/DC Comics.
Or
2) A Zach Snyder movie being an attractively shot piece of shit?
I liked Watchmen and 300 so I'll give it a shot.
Wow, so one day after Josh the Punk went nuts about the gays, Big Country is calling Cormier an Uncle Jon. What's wrong with these guys?
No, I mean, he's right. As you pointed out, Cormier is sounding disturbingly "yessir massah" there. But how do these guys not have the self-awareness to realize that, in the position they're in, they shouldn't be saying things like this?
cisco or something.
get her an accountIts fucking 3 am and i cant sleep. miracuosly shes awake giving me tips on falling asleeep. great thank you. No i didnt try just fucking LAYING THERE. Nah im good.....im good...
Congrats on the sex Gr1m lol
Hope she never sees your GAF posts
So not an arcade stick?Hey im playing third strike online with a controller..
So not an arcade stick?
Fail
No, I mean, he's right. As you pointed out, Cormier is sounding disturbingly "yessir massah" there. But how do these guys not have the self-awareness to realize that, in the position they're in, they shouldn't be saying things like this?
Cormier in 2011 said:It's hard to miss his chain. It's hard to miss him buying a Cadillac with ostrich skin seats. He has ostrich seats, 'King Mo' in the headrest. I was like, I have to get some of this.
i kinda like 4 am mma gaf...no cumbr or drm...no face to yell at everyone about games cause he has zero reflexes or any kinda dexterity to speak of. This is sorta nice
Welcome to Euro time.
Our Euro/Asia/Aussie friends are gentler than those on our side of the pond but the downside is this thread moves a bit slower.i kinda like 4 am mma gaf...no cumbr or drm...no face to yell at everyone about games cause he has zero reflexes or any kinda dexterity to speak of. This is sorta nice
Our Euro/Asia/Aussie friends are gentler than those on our side of the pond but the downside is this thread moves a bit slower.
yea but then there's cheesy
lolUgh, I'm the XBone to MMAGAF's PS4 :'(. How depressing.
Hey not all of us westerners are that abrasive..Our Euro/Asia/Aussie friends are gentler than those on our side of the pond but the downside is this thread moves a bit slower.