• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

Status
Not open for further replies.
I seriously wonder if Trump is insane and stupid OR if there is a certain deliberation to the way he speaks on this own social media platform, in order to make it easier for his "que in an uncharming word for not so bright" MAGA voters to follow along? It's like he translates information into a deliberately easy form of words for better comprehension.

As harsh as it sounds, but maybe people under a certain IQ shouldn't be allowed to vote if the world wants to make sure World War 3 never happens? Because how is it even possible this orange monkey got elected TWICE?

Technically he's even right, when he says the US is better at fighting than anyone else, but that's not important if you aren't also smart enough to know WHEN to fight. Iran is a shit country (or rather it's dictatorship) and attacking it, or better, trying to free it from a dictatorship, is a good thing, but doing so without any actual plan on how to succeed is mighty stupid. There wasn't enough preparation beforehand, or any actual assessment whether or not the people within Iran are capable of a regime bust, whether or not they have the means (weapons, freedom fighters, etc).

This is why the regime bust in Syria worked, because they actually had all that.
Instead of going straight to calling US voters "not so bright", have you considered a different possibility. Such as, I don't know, something like people who order routine executions of protestors and treat women as if they were less than human don't respond to political niceties?

You may think its insane to tell really bad guys stop it or our military will do X, Y, and Z. But I bet its far more effective than just saying "Don't."
 
They don't enrich their uranium domestically. Kinda like what we wanted from Iran...
Right, but it isn't absurd for an oil rich country to want nuclear power.
This is possibly where the US should take a back seat and the EU, having remained neutral could help with negotiations - even if Iran only wanted nuclear materials for power they wouldn't be stupid enough to put the supply in the hands of the US.
 
As harsh as it sounds, but maybe people under a certain IQ shouldn't be allowed to vote if the world wants to make sure World War 3 never happens?
Oh and who gets to decide IQ? The woke liberal experts!?!? Have you noticed how all these "intelligent" people are woke lefties? The system is rigged!! When did we allow the lefty woke mafia dictate how intelligence is measured?? I don't remember voting for that, that's not the America I love!!


/Alex Jones
 
Weirdly if you Google that name, the only thing that comes up is pretty much a repeat of that exact post. Literally there's nothing else I can find out about this person apart from the fact he's now dead.
John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt Mo-hammad Shirmohammadian,
His name is my name, too!
Whenever we go out,
The people always shout,
"There goes John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt! Mo-hammad Shirmohammadian"
Da-da-da-da-da-da-da.
 
Blockading the blockade strategy, as memish it sounds, really seems to have checkmated Iran. Strong domestic oil production of U.S. won the day

There were (YouTube) military analysts out there wondering why the US didn't just level Kharg immediately to take away as much of Iran's leverage as possible on day one.

Gotta say, I think I like the blockade idea better.
 
Blockading the blockade strategy, as memish it sounds, really seems to have checkmated Iran. Strong domestic oil production of U.S. won the day

How though? China's ship passed. Iran's ship passed i think. How did it make things better? This is me asking btw i don't get this blockading the blockade. Iran can still hit ships if they want to and close everything. They won't get a free pass on their own ships and that's it unless i am misunderstanding how this works.
 
Last edited:
How though? China's ship passed. Iran's ship passed i think. How did it make things better? This is me asking btw i don't get this blockading the blockade. Iran can still hit ships if they want to and close everything. They won't get a free pass on their own ships and that's it unless i am misunderstanding how this works.

China's ships passed because the U.S. allowed it to happen. Ultimately the biggest losers of a double blockade would be every other country except U.S. and Russia because of the domestic oil production. In this particular attrition, U.S. should be able to hold out longer and ultimately win. Theoretically, in this double blockade, oil prices should be the highest we've seen so far. But they're not and falling, which makes me think people smarter than me know how this will play out.
 
There were (YouTube) military analysts out there wondering why the US didn't just level Kharg immediately to take away as much of Iran's leverage as possible on day one.

Gotta say, I think I like the blockade idea better.
Leveling Kharg would permanently destroy critical oil infrastructure the world depends on

The blockade was a much, much better idea. After this is all over, we're still going to need Kharg to transport and deliver oil
 


i-understand-the-meme-i-understand-the-dow-but-i-dont-v0-abthup2feajg1.jpeg
 
Their stated reasoning was avoiding dependence on other countries for their energy needs, which is something most countries try to avoid. Look, we don't need to make things up. The Ayatollah isn't exactly dodging U.S. and Israeli justification for conflict. There are already real issues there without stretching the nuclear claim.
A military official from Iran appeared on their local television a while back and publicly admitted the goal of Iranian enrichment of nuclear material has always been to build nuclear weapons. I've seen the clip.
 
Blockading the blockade strategy, as memish it sounds, really seems to have checkmated Iran. Strong domestic oil production of U.S. won the day
The question is whether Iran actually has the ability to attack ships in the strait and hasn't done so because of the ceasefire or if it was mainly bluster on their part. Otherwise the ceasefire ends and the strait is even more closed than before.
 


Maybe I am not very intelligent but this seems like the US is benefitting from this colossul fuck up they've caused for the whole world? Is that correct?

Because if so, just wow. Sounds about right for the current world. What an absolute shit show.

If this is true and the rest of the world are seeing it, what a colossul fuck up by America and the worlds future.

Someone tell me I'm wrong?
 
The US should use its military might to commit seppuku in front of Europeans in order to make them feel better. Anything else is unacceptable.
 
The US should use its military might to commit seppuku in front of Europeans in order to make them feel better. Anything else is unacceptable.

I think not profiteering from a war that the US started with such poor planning, would be a good start.

then, probably sorting out innocent countries with some low cost oil to help the current situation might be a good shout too.

Hopefully that's what the US is doing with these oil sales.
 
Last edited:
I think not profiteering from a war that the US started with such poor planning, would be a good start.

then, probably sorting out innocent countries with some low cost oil to help the current situation might be a good shout too.

Hopefully that's what the US is doing with these oil sales.
I don't think it's even very good for everyday Americans as with greater demand for oil exports globally and less supply globally, I would have thought that prices increase? Although I'm not sure if there are any price caps in place for domestic supply.
 
The US should use its military might to commit seppuku in front of Europeans in order to make them feel better. Anything else is unacceptable.
Europe's not sure how they feel about it. Please wait 3-4 weeks while they organize a summit to vote on, whether they should vote on, if they feel that it is the correct thing for the US to do.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I am not very intelligent but this seems like the US is benefitting from this colossul fuck up they've caused for the whole world? Is that correct?

Because if so, just wow. Sounds about right for the current world. What an absolute shit show.

If this is true and the rest of the world are seeing it, what a colossul fuck up by America and the worlds future.

Someone tell me I'm wrong?
Calculating Oh No GIF by MOODMAN
 
I think not profiteering from a war that the US started with such poor planning, would be a good start.

then, probably sorting out innocent countries with some low cost oil to help the current situation might be a good shout too.

Hopefully that's what the US is doing with these oil sales.

Either Drump is actually the 4D chess grand master you meme him to be, or your TDS fueled attempts to undermine him (even when his buffoonery benefits you) in a great twist of irony winds up helping him and self sabotaging yourselves. This shit would have been over in a week or two if you "innocent country" bozos had backed him instead of obstinately defying him, which you STILL continue to do months later as a terrorist country holds your energy hostage with threats of bombing civilian boats in international waters.
 
Either Drump is actually the 4D chess grand master you meme him to be, or your TDS fueled attempts to undermine him (even when his buffoonery benefits you) in a great twist of irony winds up helping him and self sabotaging yourselves. This shit would have been over in a week or two if you "innocent country" bozos had backed him instead of obstinately defying him, which you STILL continue to do months later as a terrorist country holds your energy hostage with threats of bombing civilian boats in international waters.
Yeah, I don't think Europe wanted to take the blame for Trump's collosul fuck up here, as explained in an earlier video so I don't think Europe could help if they wanted to keep face with the rest of the world.

But yeah, if that's tds then cool I guess. We will just keep being Bozos and we can see what the rest of the world thinks of this whole campaign.

I guess it's just that, that Europe is dumb and stupid for not instantly becoming trump and Americas scapegoat for such an embarrassing display of egg on your face.

Then, potentially profiteering it is only going to accelerate the worlds move away from the US for everything they can. Which is what we are seeing happening.

The US is in serious trouble from what the world sees and we don't want to be dragged down with you guys. So good luck. It's all just TDS and not from a place of genuinely loving America since a young child and then growing up to see it starting to crumble Infront of your eyes.

It's sad to see for me. I loved visiting the US and New York will always be special to me. But, you guys need to sort your boy out.

Anyway that is spiraling into something out of a discussion of Iran. I apologise.

I do hope trump and squad can make some stuff happen over the next few days to sort this all out so the world can move on.

If the US can stop Iran from creating nukes then I am more than happy to pay more for some fuel over these last few weeks. It's when the shortages on everything else hits that we will be truly fucked.
 
Last edited:


A long read

TL;DR - European style "managed decline" is over. "He who controls the Spice, controls the Universe" is back!

Western developed nations hamstringing themselves with climate policy while nations like India and China pollute their way to wealth is not something I will miss, however, the following doesn't inspire me with a whole lot of confidence ...

'Two shocks did the work. Iran turned the Strait of Hormuz from a taken‑for‑granted shipping lane into a visible weapon, proving that a single revisionist state can intermittently hold a material share of global oil and gas flows at risk with drones, missiles and maritime harassment. The old assumption, that U.S. naval power would quietly underwrite open sea‑lanes, has been exposed as nostalgia. Pax Americana, in energy terms, is over.'
 
Last edited:
Theoretically, in this double blockade, oil prices should be the highest we've seen so far. But they're not and falling, which makes me think people smarter than me know how this will play

Ideally, markets should always be forward thinking. We went from "a bunch of terrorists have means to control the flow of oil" to "usa is starving the terrorists who we thought could be in control". Markets adjusted the future risk.

images
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom