• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

All seems pretty normal to me.



I don't know why people are surprised… It didn't seem to bother anyone when previous presidents did it

slideshowphoto.jpg
 
It was probably of consequence to Argentinians and especially the people on the Falkland islands.
Yes, I said as much. I am saying that who governs the Falklands is of no consequence to the other NATO allies. My argument here (Iran) is the allies are happy to gain the benefit of the objective being achieved, but not willing to share in the risk. With your Falklands example, there was no benefit to the allies, and so any similar implication of sharing the benefit without sharing the risk would make no sense.

The US and Israel started this war 7 days ago presumably without notifying other allies seeing as they are asking for access to airbases now. You act like other countries have been dragging their feet for months while the war goes on.
The military action did not exactly come out of the blue, and now that it has begun there is no indication the allies (except possibly France) are intending to help other than 'a little back from the front lines'. Helping in a defensive or support capacity is not nothing, but it is in line with President Trump's previous characterisation.
 
Top Bottom