In some regards sure, in others not so much. I can't see too many developers praising a moving target with throttling CPU and GPU performance.
The XSX is last gen I/O wise compared to PS5. Get over it. You'll be fine.
or sonic game with more complex open world levels.
I think 125% is not that big a difference. The question is whether microsoft also got rid of the bottlenecks limitting ssd potential or not. If they did they could probably handle similar streaming, if they didn't their ssd won't be much faster than a sata ssd.
We don't know how throughput of an SSD and compression methods will deliver in a practical environment when application specific coding is applied. It also becomes considerably more unclear when you realize that there is a rather decent memory bandwidth difference and bus width is not the same.
It's not throttling by Mark Cerny's words, the dev literally chooses how to balance the power budget. If he needs a little more CPU, the GPU get's downclocked and the other way around. The equivalence being power consumed and not hertz obviously so the thermal budget stays constant.
You keep saying the same bullshit over and over again.
systemwars.net
systemwars.net
This. For me it's adding up to be an awesome piece of tech
That's a fancy sentence explaining a power struggle which offsets load and throttles down the GPU to prioritize the CPU. It's atypical but all the same the CPU and GPU throttle each other, it's a very strange way of doing things. If I were simply spitballing and looking at it from the outside in I might assert that it's exposing a limitation.
You keep saying the same bullshit over and over again.
You have not yet provided any actual evidence to prove this argument while Mark Cerny already did in his panel.
Dismissing PS5's SSD technology as just being "faster" and nothing else proves you are arguing in bad faith.
I'm not surprised to see this coming from someone who's made a reputation in a fanboy console wars forum called System Wars:
You don't contribute any substantial to this forum except derailment, dismissive posts, downplaying pro-Sony threads, unwillingness to back up his arguments with actual evidence, and pseudo-technical armchair analysis.DynamiteCop - System Wars
Go back to SystemWars where you already contributed over 20,000 posts in a span of 2.5 years. You clearly proved that you care and contribute more over there than here.
DynamiteCop - System Wars
DynamiteCop!
BTFO
Ofcourse it's a limitation, but it's a way of having your cake and eating it. You get to boost either one at developers needs instead of deciding which one gets the boost in behalf of developers.
That seems to be a convolution rather than some form of revolution, Microsoft's system doesn't need to do this because both sides maintain a higher equilibrium at all times and resources never need to be prioritized.
The video involves exhaustive research into how the PS5 will perform, how it was designed, and how much it will cost. There is also some interesting leaks about RDNA 2.0…
You keep saying the same bullshit over and over again.
You have not yet provided any actual evidence to prove this argument while Mark Cerny already did in his panel.
Dismissing PS5's SSD technology as just being "faster" and nothing else proves you are arguing in bad faith.
I'm not surprised to see this coming from someone who's made a reputation in a fanboy console wars forum called System Wars:
You don't contribute any substantial to this forum except derailment, dismissive posts, downplaying pro-Sony threads, unwillingness to back up his arguments with actual evidence, and pseudo-technical armchair analysis.DynamiteCop - System Wars
Go back to SystemWars where you already contributed over 20,000 posts in a span of 2.5 years. You clearly proved that you care and contribute more over there than here.
DynamiteCop - System Wars
You always have to pick and choose if you are planning to max out the resources. If MS system did this as well it could be even better probably.
Imagine being so insecure and unable to make compelling points here that in absolute pathetic desperation you literally start playing internet detective trying to find me on other forums.You keep saying the same bullshit over and over again.
You have not yet provided any actual evidence to prove this argument while Mark Cerny already did in his panel.
Dismissing PS5's SSD technology as just being "faster" and nothing else proves you are arguing in bad faith.
I'm not surprised to see this coming from someone who's made a reputation in a fanboy console wars forum called System Wars:
You don't contribute any substantial to this forum except derailment, dismissive posts, downplaying pro-Sony threads, unwillingness to back up his arguments with actual evidence, and pseudo-technical armchair analysis.DynamiteCop - System Wars
Go back to SystemWars where you already contributed over 20,000 posts in a span of 2.5 years. You clearly proved that you care and contribute more over there than here.
DynamiteCop - System Wars
LOL what a ridiculous thing to say.
Yep
Yeah it's pretty crazy.LOL what a ridiculous thing to say.
Are you saying this kind of activity should be reported?
It's totally me but I don't think that's the point, who does this kind of stuff lol?
Nothing about Velocity in XSX. Video is crap.
Xbox Series X, it's an acronym, look it up.
Yeah but when your ceiling is universally higher and fixed you don't have to pick and choose to avoid crippling the other, you can parse your resources how you see fit and to their maximum on both fronts.
I think many can agree PS2 had some amazing advances in 3D video game design, innovation and concepts. PS5 will be the same, only greater.
Why would you think a post like this was a good idea?
