Neil Blomkamp's Alien film a direct sequel to Aliens; disregards Alien 3/Resurrection

Status
Not open for further replies.
I look forward to seeing how Blomkamp implements a south african redneck into the mix for his buddy Copley.

Fookin' aliens!

It'll be hilarious when this winds up being worse than Alien: Resurrection.

Considering Elysium, there's every chance of that possibility.
 
I bet this is gonna be a weird ass movie that is a cross between Prometheus/Alien 3 with Sharlto Copley playing some Weyland Yutani douchebag that is a cross between Burke and maybe Ash.
 
I look forward to seeing how Blomkamp implements a south african redneck into the mix for his buddy Copley.

Fookin' aliens!

Starring Sharlto Copley as the Alien Queen

"Yoo thought yoo could burn my eggs, eh? Cheeky fookin hoomans."
 
I didn't care much for District 9 despite everyone shitting their pants over it when it came out, but I still thought it was very well made and interesting. Haven't seen Elysium. I don't see how this applies to his Alien. I'm not simple minded enough to say "well because x was bad, y will be bad too" seeing as they're two completely different projects.

It's not about being simple minded. He's always the screenwriter and director for his films, and is pretty hands on with everything else - so it's safe to say that his films are going to have some fairly prominent underlying similarities - which has certainly been the case thus far.
 
Fuckin RAD meng... i'm all aboard this hype train early.

That Hick's concept art with him looking up from the seated position with his melted ass face on full display is brilliant. Really hope they nail the fear just right here...
 
Schwarzenegger could have fit into the Alien universe as an android.

May as well crossover with Predator as well.

Aliens vs. Predator vs. Terminator

Arnold will play Dutch and the T-800.
Biehn will play a genetic clone of Kyle Reese as well as a no-longer-dead Hicks.
 
What's wrong with Alien 3 really has nothing to do with the way it looks, I think it's actually a beautifully shot film with an amazing score. Frankly, I don't think the story is even really bad, it's just obviously not what people wanted at that point out of the franchise. I think it was a valid direction to go since the gap between Aliens and Alien 3 was long enough that they probably just didn't want to figure out how to deal with Newt rather than recasting her.

Hm? By widely panned, I mean shit on. People didn't like it. I wasn't referring to how it was shot.

Sorry for the confusion there. He he.
 
Hm? By widely panned, I mean shit on. People didn't like it. I wasn't referring to how it was shot.

Sorry for the confusion there. He he.

I thought one of the many rejected scripts submitted for Alien 3 was a direct sequel to Aliens. Not the william gibson draft (which should have been the one made) but the Eric Red draft http://avp.wikia.com/wiki/Alien_3_(Eric_Red)

William Gibson draft http://avp.wikia.com/wiki/Alien_III_(William_Gibson)

Also David Twohy: http://avp.wikia.com/wiki/Alien_III_(David_Twohy)
 
apone_aliens.jpg


"Somebody wake up Hicks."

CplHicksSleeping.jpg
 
Why is this a new thread. There's almost nothing functionally different about the old one and this one with regards to what we knew was happening.

Anyway: shrug.

This will be the third attempt to "make up" for Alien 3. Neither attempt has managed to be as good as Alien 3 yet.

I guess good on 'em for still trying?

I guess?

Shrug.
 
Alien 3 wasn't even that bad. I liked how it ended the story, and it made sense that Hicks and Newt die. It was like "Ripley's fate is to suffer, as a result of the Xenomorph." It fit in with the dark tone set in the first film as well. I don't like that they're completely ignoring these movies. How do they even explain that? The others were a dream or something? And how will they explain Hicks and Ripley being like 30 years older? Hypersleep should keep them the same age. Weird concept.
 
YES!!! They are wiping that TRASH Alien 3 and Resurrection from existence! I have NEVER counted those vile films as canon. What Alien 3 did to Ripley and Newt after all she went through to save that girl in Aliens is unforgivable and in my mind Ripley and Newt are still safe in cryosleep following the finale of Aliens

Why is this a new thread. There's almost nothing functionally different about the old one and this one with regards to what we knew was happening.

Anyway: shrug.

This will be the third attempt to "make up" for Alien 3. Neither attempt has managed to be as good as Alien 3 yet.

I guess good on 'em for still trying?

I guess?

Shrug.

What.....

I mean Resurrection is a dumpster fire of a film, but are you seriously suggesting Prometheus is worse than the turd that is Alien 3? Prometheus has issues no doubt, but at least it's a decent movie with amazing visuals and a great cast. The only thing Alien 3 has going for it is Sigourney Weaver.
 
Count me in with the people who liked 3 but are ok with this concept.

Resurrection was an ok space horror thing, but shouldn't have been made as an Alien film.
 
I liked Alien 3, but Alien Regurgitation was horrible. Nuking it from orbit is a good call.

The most exciting part of this is that Hicks might show back up.
 
I never saw Resurrection either but I thought 3 was just fucking awful so this has me hopeful for a good movie. Blomkamp seems like a capable director. I loved District 9 but never saw Elysium after hearing mixed things.
 
I mean Resurrection is a dumpster fire of a film, but are you seriously suggesting Prometheus is worse than the turd that is Alien 3? .

Obviously, yeah. I didn't code it particularly deceptively or anything.

Prometheus isn't as good a movie as Alien 3 is. Neither movie is really "good," so maybe that's not the word I should be using, but Alien 3 is a better film.

Devin Faraci of Badass Digest on the news:

Devin Faraci said:
He's going to disregard Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection and make a 'genetic sibling' to Aliens, one that Sigourney Weaver says will 'properly finish' Ripley's story. Which is weird, because it was pretty properly finished in Alien 3, but I guess that was too much of a downer for everybody.

It's Superman Returns all over again... Will Blomkamp approach Aliens with the kind of reverence with which Bryan Singer approached Superman: The Movie, and the kind of reverence with which James Cameron did not approach Alien? What makes the Alien franchise special - in both its successes and failures - is that each film is not the genetic sibling of the last. It's almost like an anthology series with continuity, and it would be so cool to continue that as opposed to aping the second best film in the franchise.

I hate this kind of laziness. If you're taking on a sequel and not rebooting the property you're basically playing Exquisite Corpse. Your job is to pick up the threads left and weave your own story - then leave your own threads for someone else to keep weaving. That is such a huge part of what I like about these films, but here's Blomkamp, unwilling to work at it, just hacking at the Gordian knot of Alien continuity.

I do like that both Slashfilm and now Badass are making sure to highlight that a large part of the reason Alien 3 is what it is, is specifically DUE to Sigourney Weaver calling shots. So the talk about "proper endings" is disingenuous as hell, coming from her.
 
GREAT NEWS.

The problem with Alien3 is that even after all these special cuts and recuts it still looks and plays out like a low-budget low-risk sequel.

Just look at the setting on the first film: Huge space refinery / space tug boat / hostile planet / ancient space ship. And the second: Massive space station outside of Earth / massive Earth warship / massive colony / lots of aliens.

3 strips away everything that was grandiose and gives us a bunch of British skin heads roaming around a derelict factory. blech
 
GREAT NEWS.

The problem with Alien3 is that even after all these special cuts and recuts it still looks and plays out like a low-budget low-risk sequel.

Just look at the setting on the first film: Huge space refinery / space tug boat / hostile planet / ancient space ship. And the second: Massive space station outside of Earth / massive Earth warship / massive colony / lots of aliens.

3 strips away everything that was grandiose and gives us a bunch of British skin heads roaming around a derelict factory. blech

And you better care about these British skin heads! I mean... they're all murderers and rapists, but c'mon, root for em. You got it in you, somewhere... Care about their lives.
 
So can a competent director please do this with the Terminator series? If not Cameron, someone reliable? Let's just start from Terminator 2 and finish on a high note (and jettison 3, Salvation and the upcoming Genysis)... please? :-p
 
I feel conflicted.

Maybe because I don't hate Aliens 3 as much as others do.

You don't even have to hate Alien 3 to feel conflicted, really. Faraci summed it up pretty perfectly: "If you're taking on a sequel and not rebooting the property you're basically playing Exquisite Corpse. Your job is to pick up the threads left and weave your own story - then leave your own threads for someone else to keep weaving. That is such a huge part of what I like about these films, but here's Blomkamp, unwilling to work at it, just hacking at the Gordian knot of Alien continuity."

He had an idea that didn't involve Hicks and Ripley. And instead, we're wandering into fan-film territory, basically. Just like Singer did with Superman Returns.

You don't have to like Alien 3, or Alien Resurrection, or Prometheus, to be unimpressed by this idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom