New Doom 3 Xbo screens
- Thread starter u_neek
- Start date
I'll say it again..Doom3 on xbox is looking spectacular. Those judging from the screenshots really need to stfu or watch one of the in-game videos before making a fool out of yourself.
Half the people in here judge from screenshots..thats quite funny because screenshots hardly do a game's visuals justice. Watch the video i posted on page1 of this thread..then maybe you naysayers will stfu finally lol
Its not my fault cube or ps2 aint getting this game..... :lol PS2 or cube couldnt do it...only reason why xbox can is because of the "nvidia" gpu and the extra ram and horsepower that xbox has over the other two systems.. This game was ment to be played on a nvidia gpu
Half the people in here judge from screenshots..thats quite funny because screenshots hardly do a game's visuals justice. Watch the video i posted on page1 of this thread..then maybe you naysayers will stfu finally lol
Its not my fault cube or ps2 aint getting this game..... :lol PS2 or cube couldnt do it...only reason why xbox can is because of the "nvidia" gpu and the extra ram and horsepower that xbox has over the other two systems.. This game was ment to be played on a nvidia gpu
tahrikmili
Member
Whatever anyone says, Doom 3 looks much better than any XBOX game I've seen so far - PS2 owners, don't even dare comment on the graphics :lol:
As for gameplay, it's a taste thing. I really liked it a lot, would give it a 4/5 for gameplay & AI and 5/5 for the atmosphere and graphics.
It certainly *LOADING* plays much *LOADING* better than *LOADING* Half Life *LOADING* 2.
As for gameplay, it's a taste thing. I really liked it a lot, would give it a 4/5 for gameplay & AI and 5/5 for the atmosphere and graphics.
It certainly *LOADING* plays much *LOADING* better than *LOADING* Half Life *LOADING* 2.
tahrikmili
Member
When is the release date again? So I can rehash the desktop wallpaper I made for the PC version for XBOX?
EDIT: I found the release date.. Here's a desktop wallpaper I made for the game: http://img9.exs.cx/img9/2654/doom3xboxwallpaper0ji.jpg
EDIT: I found the release date.. Here's a desktop wallpaper I made for the game: http://img9.exs.cx/img9/2654/doom3xboxwallpaper0ji.jpg
Littleberu
Banned
tahrikmili said:
Oh god. That's like the worst troll attempt. Ever. Even I can do better.
Dynamite Shikoku
Congratulations, you really deserve it!
Borys said:
aka me
Phoenix
Member
Moegames said:
You haven't been using GAF or the Internet for very long because if people did what you suggested, the only traffic on the net would be porn
That said, the game does look 'average' compare to the PC variant, but that is to be expected.That's a very speculative argument.... VERY speculative.
CrimsonSkies
Member
"D3 on Xbox doesn't wow anyone, just people who haven't updated their PC since 1997 aka cheap asses."
It shouldn't certainly impress console owners that aren't completely blind.
This was graphics in 1997 on the PC. So I suppose they would be very impressed with Doom 3. Hey you got something right.
It shouldn't certainly impress console owners that aren't completely blind.
This was graphics in 1997 on the PC. So I suppose they would be very impressed with Doom 3. Hey you got something right.
Wow, lots of haters here!!
Graphics look great for a Geforce3 class system, and the game is entirely on par with Riddick. Sure, Riddick might be a little better here and Doom3 a little better there, but that's really nitpicking. And before this gets derailed, it's petty to get into "(insert game here) has better graphics" war with Doom/Riddick because lots of muscle is going towards the light model. Both of em literally center around lighting. We're not at the point where we can mix RE4 style graphics with Doom3 style lighting. Is this news to anyone here?
Anyway, single player on a big tv with 5.1, Doom3 is a fun, suspenseful game and definitely worthy of a single playthrough. Co-op would make it worth another romp.
Graphics look great for a Geforce3 class system, and the game is entirely on par with Riddick. Sure, Riddick might be a little better here and Doom3 a little better there, but that's really nitpicking. And before this gets derailed, it's petty to get into "(insert game here) has better graphics" war with Doom/Riddick because lots of muscle is going towards the light model. Both of em literally center around lighting. We're not at the point where we can mix RE4 style graphics with Doom3 style lighting. Is this news to anyone here?
Anyway, single player on a big tv with 5.1, Doom3 is a fun, suspenseful game and definitely worthy of a single playthrough. Co-op would make it worth another romp.
Moegames said:
Technically, the game was meant to be played on a MODERN NVidia GPU. Which the one in the XBox ain't. We're talking roughly a Ti4200. Imagine what Doom 3 would look like on a PC with such a card, look at those XBox screenshots and you wind up with few surprises. It still looks decent, but I don't think it's redefinining the benchmark for XBox graphics. Frankly I still think Halo 2 stills look better. Is the XBox the only present console that could even handle a port? Probably, although I'd be interested in a Gamecube attempt, although that will never happen.
Littleberu
Banned
MarkMacD said:
Doom 3.
ChristKiller
Banned
:lol at the people who think this looks good
Dr_Cogent said:
Oh come on, this whole penis-size swapping festival isn't about "beauty" or art direction, as Doom 3's "scary" visuals have been pretty hoaky from the get-go, this is a discussion of technical graphical merits. The XBox is more capable in the regard. What's so terrible about admitting that? It certainly doesn't mean that all XBox games instantly have better art direction, but as I said, this isn't really what sparked this whole debate...
Doom_Bringer
Banned
New trailer up on Xbox IGN, looks fantastic in motion!
Ninja Scooter
Member
this is what happens when you scale down a game that was hyped based solely on the graphics and technology. Of course people are gonna be disappointed. The only think Doom3 really ever had going for it was the graphics. Stip that away and its not so impressive anymore.
MomoPufflet
Member
Doom 3 was all graphics/atmosphere with zero redeeming gameplay qualities on PC-- I don't even want to know what that would make the Xbox version.
Ninja Scooter said:
The console crowd is not the PC crowd. Sure they overlap but they are quite different. How many on this board don't even want to move to next gen this year, next year. PC wise Doom 3 as you say is based on graphics and technology. On the console think about the capabilities of the console. I can argue that the same point i.e. graphics and technology for a computer built in 2001.
You need to understand the mentality of the console gamer. I'm sure you realize that the console crowd may and will have an entirely different perspective. There is so much garbage on consoles that Doom3 Xbox is put into a different light than it is on the PC. The proof is on your progressive enabled wide screen television. For a 2001 console I'm sure the game, from a graphics perspective will easily live up to expectations. Gameplay is another story. The haters in this thread who are mainly console gamers should know better. Shame.
Duckhuntdog
Member
impirius said:
Well, the models are really low-poly. Even in the PC version screen shots, things looked pasted in because it was so jaggy.
Yup. The early shots definitely looked like ass (Tenebrae looked better), but these new ones are nothing to scoff at. I'm impressed, by Xbox standards.
I always thought you were supposed to look at games when you play them.
It's a good point, but if I have to live with releases like Big Rigs that I'll never see in the first place to recieve free gems like n (http://www.harveycartel.org/metanet/n.html), I'll live.
Dr_Cogent said:
The point was ... and don't pull shit out of context (PC garbage, who gives a flying fuck), was that my belief is that the console world is far more forgiving where graphics are concerned vs. the PC crowd who spend mega bucks on graphic cards and would never settle for something like this. From all accounts the game, graphically speaking, looks good for an Xbox game and in the end that's all that's going to matter. This whole it's been stripped of it's PC graphical glory is irrelevant. No one that is going to play this on the Xbox gives a shit that it doesn't look like the PC version. It's an inane argument and insulting to console gamers. The test, as has been mentioned, is does it look as good as Xbox Riddick. If it doesn't then I will be disappointed.
